Except I am not using absolutes. Your example ONLY works with absolutes.
Um, no. Not really. In fact, not at all. An outlier is something that falls outside a given trend or assumption. one or two outliers do not disprove the theory. Otherwise, someone jumping out of an airplane without a parachute and living would mean that no one ever needed to use parachutes again.
My point is that we will probably see nothing of significance new for the PC platform. So those that already have the disks won't buy it. And those that don't have the disks now, still have the opportunity to buy it NOW. So where is the benefit in coming out with another set of disks that is exactly the same (or only very minor changes) as what exists now? None that I can see. And those that have both PCs and Ipads can still play the PC version, so why would they buy this version?
And the reason that the Ipad initiative is useless and harmful is that resources are being spent on developing an application with a marginal to non existent market. Sales expectations are going to be higher than the market can support (given what I said above). The Return on investment is not going to be there. And Atari/Hasboro will see it as proof that the product is no longer viable, thus killing any possibility of someone later coming along with an actual chance of making BGIII.
Understand now?
I disagree. I just bought 3 games I already have again so I can use them on my phone. There os a huge difference between having a game available to play on my computer, which I have access to maybe 2 hours a day, and having it on my phone that I have on me at all times. It is a measure of convienience. The iPad will be far more convenient
Than the computer. In fact I am typing this on my Phone while I am trying to get my daughter to sleep.