StinkyPinky
Diamond Member
- Jul 6, 2002
- 6,956
- 1,268
- 126
I don't think I will.
I wont either if it's just a resolution update and a few tacked on quests. The original game is already huge.
I don't think I will.
When I try and read the news on the website, it asks me to log in?!
Really NOT liking the new cartoony look to the art of the characters. Nor the dollar price point for the PC version. yeah, I figured that it was going to be a non-event for fans who already had a version.![]()
Really NOT liking the new cartoony look to the art of the characters. Nor the dollar price point for the PC version. yeah, I figured that it was going to be a non-event for fans who already had a version.![]()
Really NOT liking the new cartoony look to the art of the characters. Nor the dollar price point for the PC version. yeah, I figured that it was going to be a non-event for fans who already had a version.![]()
From the screen shots, it looks like the backgrounds have seen some attention, but the character models look unchanged to me.
Still will buy it for a couple reasons. 1) BG is probably one of the best games ever made. 2)I want to support devs who give attention to classics. 3) To avoid the hassle of trying to install, mod, and run 'classic' BG on modern computers.
Not sure what you're seeing, but the characters and graphics look the same to me.
From the screen shots, it looks like the backgrounds have seen some attention, but the character models look unchanged to me.
Totally agree.Still will buy it for a couple reasons.
1) BG is probably one of the best games ever made.
I prefer to support intelligently. If I thought this might lead to BG3 ultimately, I might agree with you. But I am not going to throw good money after bad on a project that I feel is doomed to fail. I would rather the same money go to support a project with more of a future. And considering that I can get all three (BG1-BG2 and ToB) for $15 whereas the "Enhanced" version of JUST BG1 costs $20, doesn't seem like a fair distribution of funds.2)I want to support devs who give attention to classics.
3) To avoid the hassle of trying to install, mod, and run 'classic' BG on modern computers.
go to the baldursgate.com site and see the latest post. They list three new characters and a new adventure. If you look at the art for the characters, they are very cartoony. And no, they are no where near like the art for the previous characters like Imoen and Minsc.
Which is unfortunate, because it wouldn't be much work to upscale the rendered sprites and put them through an anti aliasing filter, and then sharpen if needed. Probably wouldn't be much more work to interpolate the animation frames either, so we could run the game at 60 frames per second without being all turbo.Looking through their forum, it seems that they are unable to alter anything from the original gameplay(npc scripts, voice overs etc) because of legal issues. The only thing they seem to be legally allowed to do is add to the game and not change the game.
Music samples from the new quest expansion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Imca73o350k&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4_hLiXUKm8&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=3u4IGKZ0IXY
Sounds right in line with what I would expect from a BG game.
Really???
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
MAYBE Neera, but they all look pretty similar in art style...
those are not the images that are shown on baldursgate.com. The ones on their home page are MUCH more cartoony.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
See what I mean? Much more cartoony.