Someone give me one solid reason why...

[Aimster]

I want to know one solid reason why you believe it was right to go into Iraq. I cannot think of one. Please tell me one reason.

 

[nick1985]

troll/flamebait

 

[glugglug]

We couldn't let oil start to be traded in Euros.

 

[sandorski]

Mushroom Clouds!

 

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: nick1985
troll/flamebait

No I'm serious. I bring up Iran and everyone ignores me. So I'm bringing it up here. Why is Iraq > Iran. Every reason anyone can think of for going to war with Iraq, Iran has done worse.

 

[rickn]

Originally posted by: sandorski
Mushroom Clouds!

the only mushroom clouds are the ones coming out of Condi's ass

 

[alchemize]

Low hanging fruit.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: nick1985
troll/flamebait

Repetitive Republican Fluffer. Do you have to wipe your face after you are done posting in this forum or do you just let the glaze on your face shine for the rest of the day?

 

[Aimster]

Surely someone has a reason. As always when I bring up Iran and compare it to Iraq nobody has anything to say .. . blah

 

[cwjerome]

Aimster, I will fully tell you why I advocated invasion of Iraq and still support it now. After the election 🙂

Coming Soon!! CWJerome's Iraqi Rationale!!! Wooot

 

[alchemize]

Originally posted by: Aimster
Surely someone has a reason. As always when I bring up Iran and compare it to Iraq nobody has anything to say .. . blah

I already posted. Low hanging fruit.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: alchemize

Originally posted by: Aimster
Surely someone has a reason. As always when I bring up Iran and compare it to Iraq nobody has anything to say .. . blah

I already posted. Low hanging fruit.

I believe in Alchemize's social circle that that means "Young Males Genitalia"

 

[Darkhawk28]

Aimster, these neocons are people that don't have any justification to much of what they say. Try as they might, only the mindless actually are fooled by the Administration's ramblings and stammerings.

I must've seen, read or heard about 20 different justifications for the war. The first one was a lie, flat-out. The next 19 or so are just pure bullsh*t.

 

[Infohawk]

Originally posted by: nick1985
troll/flamebait

That is ridiculous. If you can't think of an answer (like the way the conservatives can't respond to the study showing that Republicans are ignorant), then just don't post.

 

[Ozoned]

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: nick1985
troll/flamebait

No I'm serious. I bring up Iran and everyone ignores me. So I'm bringing it up here. Why is Iraq > Iran. Every reason anyone can think of for going to war with Iraq, Iran has done worse.

In a pure tactical sense, I might point out that you could look at a map and view the relationship of Iran and the places that we have a footprint in the middle east.

It aint rocket science, sparky. 😉

 

[alchemize]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: alchemize

Originally posted by: Aimster
Surely someone has a reason. As always when I bring up Iran and compare it to Iraq nobody has anything to say .. . blah

I already posted. Low hanging fruit.

I believe in Alchemize's social circle that that means "Young Males Genitalia"

RedDawn, are you just going to post homosexual references to every thread you disagree with tonight? Oh - that's what unoriginal dipshits do - carry on.

 

[rickn]

Originally posted by: Aimster
Surely someone has a reason. As always when I bring up Iran and compare it to Iraq nobody has anything to say .. . blah

Saddam was an imminent threat to the united states, and some day he may have reconstituted his programs for weapons of mass destruction, from materials and weapons which he apparently didn't possess.

Now ask me if I could keep a straight face typing that 😀

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: alchemize

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: alchemize

Originally posted by: Aimster
Surely someone has a reason. As always when I bring up Iran and compare it to Iraq nobody has anything to say .. . blah

I already posted. Low hanging fruit.

I believe in Alchemize's social circle that that means "Young Males Genitalia"

RedDawn, are you just going to post homosexual references to every thread you disagree with tonight? Oh - that's what unoriginal dipshits do - carry on.

I'm sorry, I thought you had a sense of humor. Oh that's right, you're a Republican! You actually can sit through a Bush Press conference and not crack a smile🙂

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: Ozoned

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: nick1985
troll/flamebait

No I'm serious. I bring up Iran and everyone ignores me. So I'm bringing it up here. Why is Iraq > Iran. Every reason anyone can think of for going to war with Iraq, Iran has done worse.

In a pure tactical sense, I might point out that you could look at a map and view the relationship of Iran and the places that we have a footprint in the middle east.

It aint rocket science, sparky. 😉

And you obviously aren't a Rocket Scientist!

 

[gutharius]

In all honesty, the only remotely defensable reason I have heard from a republican or neocon is this, "It was the right thing to do because the Iraqis are now going to be a free people governed by peacful deomcratic principles." But it is still a weak argument because who are we as americans to decide who gets to be freed and who doesn't. It can also be said that if the Iraqis wanted this they could have revolted and created such a government and nation themselves. As I recall, during Clinton's administration, the US was seriously funding groups in iraq who were intent on taking down saddam and instigating a revolt in order to acheive a government change. But, they really had a hard time finding anyone who wanted to do this. Perhaps this was because the Iraqis, while governed by what we perceive as a military dictator, looked at the nation and themselves and felt content the way they were. Honestly, I don't know why they did not revolt, and only an iraqi could tell you that.

Personally I see no reason why we should have or had the right to invade. But the Bush would say, "This is the man that tried to kill my dad." as a reson to invade. Which is really a piss poor reason to send 1000+ americans, as well as countless innocent iraqi and non-iraqi citizens, and allied troops to their deaths.

 

[Ozoned]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: Ozoned

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: nick1985
troll/flamebait

No I'm serious. I bring up Iran and everyone ignores me. So I'm bringing it up here. Why is Iraq > Iran. Every reason anyone can think of for going to war with Iraq, Iran has done worse.

In a pure tactical sense, I might point out that you could look at a map and view the relationship of Iran and the places that we have a footprint in the middle east.

It aint rocket science, sparky. 😉

And you obviously aren't a Rocket Scientist!

And you obviously aren't getting enough!

 

[Aimster]

Taking over Afghanistan/Iraq didn't really surround Iran. In a way it did. However, now every missle/artillery in Iran's army is capable of hitting U.S forces. Before their missles would hit the ocean. Now they can hit U.S bases.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: Ozoned

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: Ozoned

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: nick1985
troll/flamebait

No I'm serious. I bring up Iran and everyone ignores me. So I'm bringing it up here. Why is Iraq > Iran. Every reason anyone can think of for going to war with Iraq, Iran has done worse.

In a pure tactical sense, I might point out that you could look at a map and view the relationship of Iran and the places that we have a footprint in the middle east.

It aint rocket science, sparky. 😉

And you obviously aren't a Rocket Scientist!

And you obviously aren't getting enough!

Ah, I can never get enough!😉

Logging off to try and get what I can!

 

[Ozoned]

Originally posted by: gutharius
In all honesty, the only remotely defensable reason I have heard from a republican or neocon is this, "It was the right thing to do because the Iraqis are now going to be a free people governed by peacful deomcratic principles." But it is still a weak argument because who are we as americans to decide who gets to be freed and who doesn't. It can also be said that if the Iraqis wanted this they could have revolted and created such a government and nation themselves. As I recall, during Clinton's administration, the US was seriously funding groups in iraq who were intent on taking down saddam and instigating a revolt in order to acheive a government change. But, they really had a hard time finding anyone who wanted to do this. Perhaps this was because the Iraqis, while governed by what we perceive as a military dictator, looked at the nation and themselves and felt content the way they were. Honestly, I don't know why they did not revolt, and only an iraqi could tell you that.

Personally I see no reason why we should have or had the right to invade. But the Bush would say, "This is the man that tried to kill my dad." as a reson to invade. Which is really a piss poor reason to send 1000+ americans, as well as countless innocent iraqi and non-iraqi citizens, and allied troops to their deaths.

Actually, one of the reasons that congress authorized the use of force against sadamm was that there was an assasination plot by Iraq against a former president of the united states.

 

[nick1985]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: Ozoned

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: nick1985
troll/flamebait

No I'm serious. I bring up Iran and everyone ignores me. So I'm bringing it up here. Why is Iraq > Iran. Every reason anyone can think of for going to war with Iraq, Iran has done worse.

In a pure tactical sense, I might point out that you could look at a map and view the relationship of Iran and the places that we have a footprint in the middle east.

It aint rocket science, sparky. 😉

And you obviously aren't a Rocket Scientist!

go cut your nasty pony tail hippy :roll: