Deeko
Lifer
- Jun 16, 2000
- 30,215
- 11
- 81
A) Again...you've responded several times in this thread about the federal government, and how a program like this should be state run or private. Ignoring the actual issue, just blindly lashing out at people who are proposing ANYTHING be done by ANY government
B) You're now talking about social programs as a whole. What everyone here is trying to explain - and you're ignoring - is that this is a step in the right direction from a fiscal standpoint. Providing free birth control = cheap. Providing the existing social programs that exist because people don't use birth control = expensive. Would it be ideal for the government not to provide either? Of course! But this would greatly lessen the need for the latter programs, on which you aren't even commenting, and that's what the thread is about. Not federal fiscal responsibility.
C) You are serious? A thread about free condoms, you turn into WOW LOLZ YOU SHOULD STOP CHARGING MASSIVE AMOUNTS TO YOUR CREDIT CARDS AND EXPECTING YOUR KIDZ TO PAY11!!!1. How are you being at all productive to your cause, or contributing to the topic at hand, with trash like that?
B) You're now talking about social programs as a whole. What everyone here is trying to explain - and you're ignoring - is that this is a step in the right direction from a fiscal standpoint. Providing free birth control = cheap. Providing the existing social programs that exist because people don't use birth control = expensive. Would it be ideal for the government not to provide either? Of course! But this would greatly lessen the need for the latter programs, on which you aren't even commenting, and that's what the thread is about. Not federal fiscal responsibility.
C) You are serious? A thread about free condoms, you turn into WOW LOLZ YOU SHOULD STOP CHARGING MASSIVE AMOUNTS TO YOUR CREDIT CARDS AND EXPECTING YOUR KIDZ TO PAY11!!!1. How are you being at all productive to your cause, or contributing to the topic at hand, with trash like that?