midwestfisherman
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2003
- 3,564
- 8
- 81
That would be the first time two political whores ran for office.Originally posted by: MogulMonster
I would love to see a Rice / Giuliani ticket for the Republicans. Intelligence and charisma on one ticket? Unheard of.
Originally posted by: Nocturnal
Or will it be Barbara Bush VS Hilary Clinton?
Or perhaps it will be one of the two Bush daughter's against Hilary?
Who's up in '08?
Originally posted by: FoBoT
Originally posted by: conjur
Cheney will be stepping down soon.
Giuliani will be named the replacement.
i forgot about Giuliani , he could run against Billiary, but it would be a subway series, not good selling to south/flyover states, although the 9/11 tie in he has would probably work
The moment the first plane hit one of the two Towers Giuliani became a great mayor. Prior to that he was a fsck up with a limp dick.
Originally posted by: Nitemare
The moment the first plane hit one of the two Towers Giuliani became a great mayor. Prior to that he was a fsck up with a limp dick.
You are kidding me with your ignorance...NY was a friggin corrupt sleazeball cess pool before he took over.
Originally posted by: MoobyTheGoldenCalf
I pray Hilary is the nominee. That would be a bigger republican sweep than Reagan/Mondale...
Sorry, folks. There will NEVER be a woman president in any of our lifetimes....
lol, I love how the liberals rephrase being tough as "trampling civil liberties" you mean like requiring welfare recipients to actually PROVE they were eligible for benifits, which for some strange reason half of them didnt even try to, saving the New York taxpayer millions, if not Billions over several years in fraudulent welfare payouts.Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: Nitemare
The moment the first plane hit one of the two Towers Giuliani became a great mayor. Prior to that he was a fsck up with a limp dick.
You are kidding me with your ignorance...NY was a friggin corrupt sleazeball cess pool before he took over.
but he trampled on civil liberties to get there, and a lot of NYC'ers were happier with old-NYC.
pre-9/11, his approval ratings were pretty low, especially with his affair.
If cheney steps down, how is a replacement chosen? It's not just whoever bush wants, since VP is an elected position. Would congress/senate decide or is it like federal judges where the president proposes and the congress/senate vote on it?Originally posted by: conjur
No. That would have been a mistake for the Bush campaign. That's a major move and to do it before an election would rattle the foundations of the Bush supporters.Originally posted by: FuzzyBee
If this were going to happen, it would've happened before the election.Originally posted by: conjur
Cheney will be stepping down soon.
Giuliani will be named the replacement.
Cheney is out of politics after this term, Giuliani will be named a replacement before long.
Repubs will never put a black woman on the ballot - then they couldn't count on their southern racist base.Originally posted by: MogulMonster
I would love to see a Rice / Giuliani ticket for the Republicans. Intelligence and charisma on one ticket? Unheard of.
Originally posted by: crimson117If cheney steps down, how is a replacement chosen? It's not just whoever bush wants, since VP is an elected position. Would congress/senate decide or is it like federal judges where the president proposes and the congress/senate vote on it?
Originally posted by: assemblage
Alan Keyes, Al Sharpton, and Al Gore. Al Gore will win because in 2000 he would have won and the same people still like him and probably more. If conservatives, Christians and Republicans don't cheat he would win by a landslide in 2008.
Originally posted by: jman19
The last thing the Dems need is Hillary running for office.
This election has made several things clear (in this day and age):
1. Running a northerner means conceiding the south.
2. Senatorial candidates are too easy to smear in the media.
3. Anyone with a predominately liberal voting record is doomed, as the Republicans have effectively made "liberal" a negative word.
On that note, the ideal Dem candidate will be one with some Southern apeal, who doesn't have an easy record to attack, which likely means a governor or a young senator/congressman.
