So where's the "We The People" spew now?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

HumblePie

Lifer
Oct 30, 2000
14,665
440
126
No, I would have been impressed if they won both the House and the Senate. I would have been impressed if they won all the seats. Actually, a few polls at one point showed Repubs winning damn near everything except 1 or 2 seats from either side of Congress. I am mocking the people that thought that this election represented a huge change. It does not. I had someone in real life try to bet me that the (R) and especially the tea baggers, were going to control both House and Senate for $50. First off I thinking betting on politics is stupid as all it does it create bad blood whether you win or lose so I didn't bet. I would have won however.

The point is that the (R) own the house, but not by a landslide. There is not a guarantee that anything going through the house will go the way of the (R) agenda like it was pretty much guaranteed to go the (D) way up until now. Yes, 58 seats there is big, but not all it could have been is the point I'm making.
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
688
126
Obama already got his agenda passed. Time to implement it.

Really? You mean that watered down, crappy health care bill which he and the Democrats didn't really want but signed on anyway just to say they did something?

I guess there is no need to re-elect him in 2012 if he got his entire agenda passed.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
I am kind of disappointed O'Donnell didn't win. She would have been like the Senate's Palin.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Really? You mean that watered down, crappy health care bill which he and the Democrats didn't really want but signed on anyway just to say he did something?

It's not like if he held Senate he would have been able to pass a different one. So to the extent of what is feasible to get passed in Washington, he passed his agenda.
 

dainthomas

Lifer
Dec 7, 2004
14,957
3,947
136
Really? You mean that watered down, crappy health care bill which he and the Democrats didn't really want but signed on anyway just to say they did something?

I agree, single payer would have been the way to go. Too bad the Dems caved to the Republican filibuster threat. :thumbsdown:
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Obama's agenda is dead now. Even he said it so yesterday. He said if rebuplicans take the house his agenda is dead.

Mission Accomplish Americans!
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
688
126
It's not like if he held Senate he would have been able to pass a different one. So to the extent of what is feasible to get passed in Washington, he passed his agenda.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought the Democrats firmly held the Senate until Kennedy croaked?
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,889
6,784
126
We the fearful have spoken and won the day. The carrion birds of the Right have prevailed. The party of death is back in town. They have been given a new chance to destroy the country and they don't aim to fail. Time for cowardly Democrats to start working with the maggots.
 

wayliff

Lifer
Nov 28, 2002
11,720
11
81
This is the largest republican swing in 70 years. We The People, taking it back, stopping tyranny in it's tracks!

I do not take any credit away from this election having a good swing...however again saying "we the people" is an overstatement...

I hate when politicians, and the members of the team that won, throw that term like an absolute when it really means one, or a few more points, above 50%. That is distant from "we the people".

I hope that swing means better balance and not extremism to left or right but that is probably just naive.
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Are you serious, OP? This is a massive swing. The change of seats in the house was huge.

Not really. What has it really changed? Is shit going to working in DC now because the R have taken the house? Yeah! The country is in a stall with the D's or the R's in control of the House. Had they taken the Senate, too, then we might have had something. This changed little to nothing about business as usual.
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,080
5,453
136
60 seat change is huge, although I'd be willing to bet we see the same amount of friendly bi-partisan cooperation we've seen the past 2 years going forward :rolleyes:
 

dainthomas

Lifer
Dec 7, 2004
14,957
3,947
136
Daint, should I add you to the list?

I'm sorry, was that not a legitimate question? Why should I vote for someone different just because of the letter next to their name if it doesn't benefit me? :confused:

But good luck with your clueless noobs. I suppose Boehner can always use more lackeys to fetch his coffee, dry cleaning, and spray tan solution.
 

manimal

Lifer
Mar 30, 2007
13,559
8
0
Fortunately the blue dogs who sold it out got taken to the woodshed last night.

I am glad Blanche Lincoln lost, she did more to get rid of a public option than anyone else...


While this is a big swing and takes us back to pre 2008 levels in many states when it comes to republican authority this does not represent a mandate in any way shape or form. This was an election based on our economic condition. Saying it was anything else is disingenuous and stupid.

The real lesson here is messaging. Republicans won the message war which btw is much easier when you are on the outside looking in. Wait for the real bills to come out of the house to see if they can do anything. Sure they are gonna throw some softball bs bills like the no viagra for felons or a constitutional amendment to prevent bailouts......

As soon as they go corporatist they are screwed....


John of orange will have a harder time than Nancy Pelosi did by the time this is over.
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
688
126
Are you trying to make my point or yours?

I'm trying to stop your excuses. They DID hold the Senate -- firmly -- before Kennedy died. Why didn't they pass it then?

And that isn't even the best part. All the Democrats had to do was to put up a semi-decent candidate in the race to determine Kennedy's successor, and they would've held that seat. Oops!
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,970
11,675
136
So what you're saying is, that Brown was a less than semi-decent alternative?
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
688
126
Republicans, for the time being.

Yes, so which would you rather have:

Republicans

or

DINOs who could at least be counted to support some of the Democratic agenda?

I just find it incredibly odd that you'd celebrate the Blue Dogs getting bounced when they were replaced by Republicans who will oppose just about anything the Democrats want. At least the Blue Dogs would support the Democrats on many things.
 
Last edited:

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
688
126
So what you're saying is, that Brown was a less than semi-decent alternative?

I pass no judgment on Brown, as I am not too familiar with him. It seems to me, though, that in a state that leans so heavily Democratic, all the Democrats had to do was throw up an average candidate and they would probably hold the seat.