Victorian Gray
Lifer
- Nov 25, 2013
- 32,083
- 11,718
- 136
Seems to be moving along quite nicely thanks for asking leave a tip in the jar on your way out schmuck.
What were the Russian nationals indicted for?
Just for the lawls.
It's an honest question. You gonna answer?
You seem to have the answer.
I don't. I haven't been following this very closely.
There's this thing called "the internet" and "google." Go try it out. You'll be amazed at the answers you'll get. It would have helped the OP - maybe it'll help you................................
Sigh. Your reticence to give a straight answer gives me some hint of the truth. But fine I'll figure it out myself.
Why should he extend patience and any other courtesy to you? Do you think you do that for others?Sigh. Your reticence to give a straight answer gives me some hint of the truth. But fine I'll figure it out myself.
What were the Russian nationals indicted for?
It's an honest question. You gonna answer?
I don't. I haven't been following this very closely.
Why is the sky blue? It's an honest question. you gonna answer? I haven't been following this very closely.Sigh. Your reticence to give a straight answer gives me some hint of the truth. But fine I'll figure it out myself.
Here's the deal: Special counsel Robert Mueller has indicted 13 Russian nationals and three Russian entities for allegedly meddling in the 2016 presidential election, charging them with conspiracy to defraud the United States.Sigh. Your reticence to give a straight answer gives me some hint of the truth. But fine I'll figure it out myself.
Why should he extend patience and any other courtesy to you? Do you think you do that for others?
You have the easy means to learn something through the outlets that you will believe. That avoids him giving you a link that your reject out of hand for it's URL or whatever other bias you're bringing to things. I hope you found out by now and can come back with some insights.
Why is the sky blue? It's an honest question. you gonna answer? I haven't been following this very closely.
Sigh, I'm unwilling to look something up that is clear public knowledge. Hence, whatever I believe must supersede whatever actual clear public knowledge exists.
Man, you conservatives are really, really fucking good at being useful idiots. And no, I won't explain that phrase.
Keep on keepin' on!
Why should he extend patience and any other courtesy to you? Do you think you do that for others?
You have the easy means to learn something through the outlets that you will believe. That avoids him giving you a link that your reject out of hand for it's URL or whatever other bias you're bringing to things. I hope you found out by now and can come back with some insights.
Here's the deal: Special counsel Robert Mueller has indicted 13 Russian nationals and three Russian entities for allegedly meddling in the 2016 presidential election, charging them with conspiracy to defraud the United States.
And remember, before these incitements came down Trump publicly stated again and again, no Russian involvement. Now the Muller team is investigating whether Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russians to do it. Think of the immense logic that they did because Trump also denies this. No collusion No collusion! Then factor in all the indications of collusion that have been discovered so far.
Republicans didn't just elect a an egotistical dick head, but a criminal thug willing to commit treason as well. And just think, Trump has a lawyer who has form letter non-disclosure agreement all ready to go when one of Trump's sex partners threatens to squeal, including don-disclosure of any children. Can we assume those are the ones that don't get aborted?
Personally, I value him rather highly for his deep commitment to the value of life even if I don’t fully agree with all of his opinions on how that is best expressed.Atreus21 has the intellectual curiosity of a Milk Dud. lol.
You are welcome but only the first part was a straight answer. The rest was polemical, whatever that means.Thanks, truly, for actually giving a straight answer. It seems to elude others here.
That avoids him giving you a link that your reject out of hand for it's URL....
Do me a favor. Give me one example where I've ever done that in this forum. Or is that too incumbent upon me to prove or disprove?
The only one I can recall is when I cautioned against using RT as a source for anything.
The simple answer to the op's question: When hell freezes over. Mueller is has a job for as long as he wants to keep working. Now let's see how many lives get destroyed in his wake, through the next decade...
Trump can't fire Mueller without huge ramifications and he knows it. The only one who can call off the dogs is Rosenstein and he won't do it. Sessions is powerless.
The simple answer to the op's question: When hell freezes over. Mueller is has a job for as long as he wants to keep working. Now let's see how many lives get destroyed in his wake, through the next decade...
Trump can't fire Mueller without huge ramifications and he knows it. The only one who can call off the dogs is Rosenstein and he won't do it. Sessions is powerless.
I'd say if it were anyone else in the same predicament that Trump is in, I'd totally agree with you. But for the fact that Trump actually won his run at the presidency against the odds he was facing I told myself I would never ever underestimate that guy again. So with that, all I'm going to say about this is that anything and I mean Anything is possible with Trump.