lol... *yawn*Originally posted by: Justorq
Why isn't anyone talking about that Philips player !! It's a lot better looking than the ipod
Originally posted by: Justorq
Why isn't anyone talking about that Philips player !! It's a lot better looking than the ipod
If you want WMA support, lots of players do.Originally posted by: dartworth
Nothing beats an iPod...NOTHING
Originally posted by: werk
If you want WMA support, lots of players do.Originally posted by: dartworth
Nothing beats an iPod...NOTHING
Originally posted by: dartworth
Originally posted by: werk
If you want WMA support, lots of players do.Originally posted by: dartworth
Nothing beats an iPod...NOTHING
WMA is suck. AAC is where it is at.
Originally posted by: fivespeed5
Originally posted by: dartworth
Originally posted by: werk
If you want WMA support, lots of players do.Originally posted by: dartworth
Nothing beats an iPod...NOTHING
WMA is suck. AAC is where it is at.
I agree the iPod is great BUT what if you want built in radio, ogg or wma support, or something cheaper, or something with better battery life?
Your arguments are very articulate dartworth, you should become a lawyer! Your skills are wasting away here.
Originally posted by: Koing
Originally posted by: fivespeed5
Originally posted by: isekii
so far, apple doesn't have any reason to cut cost.
IPOD is still cream of the crop as far as portable mp3 players go.
So far it's the cream of the crop. But if you look at all the new hdd players coming out with MORE features and better quality, at an even lower price it's inevitable that they have to drop the price.
Yup and I'd agree. But the 'design' of the newer mp3 players have to be GOOD. I just say copy the dam thing, make it smaller and add an incline remote with a screen and a decent clip. Bettery battery life or at least you can change it easily. Then I am on board. I don't care what brand as long as it looks 'good'.
I had a 2nd gen 20Gb iPod. Thought it was cool then used it for a while then couldn't live with the size and bulk of it personally. Remote sucked for me going from MD with a sweet remote. Now back on MD and waiting for a mp3 player I like.
Koing
Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
People still buy them even though there's fierce competition out now. They might sell more but they'd have lower profit margins. It's just a simple cost/benefit analysis. I'd be willing to bet they'd make a lot more money selling at a higher price with higher profits than selling more IPODs at a lower price with lower profits.
Apple also has the name recognition working for them. You hear HD based MP3 player, or sometimes even MP3 player, and most people instantly think IPOD.
Originally posted by: dartworth
Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
People still buy them even though there's fierce competition out now. They might sell more but they'd have lower profit margins. It's just a simple cost/benefit analysis. I'd be willing to bet they'd make a lot more money selling at a higher price with higher profits than selling more IPODs at a lower price with lower profits.
Apple also has the name recognition working for them. You hear HD based MP3 player, or sometimes even MP3 player, and most people instantly think IPOD.
1.79 iPods sold every minute in 2003
You can use the Karma on any OS with TCP/IP and a Java interpreter.Originally posted by: dartworth
The iPod is superior in every way.
Well, I should say it is the best player for my needs. Being both a mac and pc user.
Originally posted by: werk
You can use the Karma on any OS with TCP/IP and a Java interpreter.Originally posted by: dartworth
The iPod is superior in every way.
Well, I should say it is the best player for my needs. Being both a mac and pc user.![]()
Murphy's Law is never broken.Originally posted by: ITJunkie
Originally posted by: johngute
the day after you buy one.
LOL....true :beer:
