Originally posted by: kami333
Originally posted by: DT4K
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: PanzerIV
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: yukichigai
Does he fear this new "electricity" thing as well?Originally posted by: MogulMonster
The head of my IT department still thinks that the whole computer is called a hard drive, and that the routers are modems.
I think our head of IS (our version of IT) would preffer us to use Token Ring because it's somehow safer. She's afraid of wireless.
The guy I'm talking about is afraid of wireless too.
But is he afraid of it due to security reasons or because he's afraid of new technology?
he should be afraid of wireless. its completely insecure and not reliable.
WEP out of the box maybe. But it is definitely possible to have a secure wireless lan.
But better no wireless than a halfassed secured one.
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: DT4K
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: PanzerIV
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: yukichigai
Does he fear this new "electricity" thing as well?Originally posted by: MogulMonster
The head of my IT department still thinks that the whole computer is called a hard drive, and that the routers are modems.
I think our head of IS (our version of IT) would preffer us to use Token Ring because it's somehow safer. She's afraid of wireless.
The guy I'm talking about is afraid of wireless too.
But is he afraid of it due to security reasons or because he's afraid of new technology?
he should be afraid of wireless. its completely insecure and not reliable.
WEP out of the box maybe. But it is definitely possible to have a secure wireless lan.
no it is not. It can be jammed.
we have a hard enough time securing wired lans, let alone wireless.
Originally posted by: lnguyen
Originally posted by: silverpig
Hand him a TPS report on what firefox is.
heh... am i the only one who got a chuckle out of that?
Originally posted by: Argo
A while back I was in a meeting with VP of IT operations of a big financial company. The guy was pretty smart, however, he wasn't completely up to date on their infrastructure or some other details. He didn't have to be, he had his subordinate by his side, who knew everything about their systems.
Yet, I totally understood why this guy was a VP and the other guy wasn't. The guy was totally intimidating, seemed to right away know what questions to ask and what to say. In the end, he'd be the one to make his company successful and not somebody who maybe knows 10x more but doesn't know how to apply that knowledge.
