Question so long and thanks for all the fish

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,686
4,342
136
www.teamjuchems.com
Wowsers. So much data & data interpretation gone. Sad day.

In these days of AI shenanigans, that fact this wasn't worth putting a small team against to keep just modernized to keep hosted is pretty shocking. That's a high ranking domain seemingly relegated to the trash bin.

When you want to make the content static and remove all of the dynamic content and remove all of the backend functionality it couldn't have been that challenging.

The more I consider it, its freaking terrible. The fact that all of that will be lost to any future AI ingestion (fwiw) as a very trusted source of pre-AI content and structure really sucks.
 

yottabit

Golden Member
Jun 5, 2008
1,635
763
146
Wowsers. So much data & data interpretation gone. Sad day.

In these days of AI shenanigans, that fact this wasn't worth putting a small team against to keep just modernized to keep hosted is pretty shocking. That's a high ranking domain seemingly relegated to the trash bin.

When you want to make the content static and remove all of the dynamic content and remove all of the backend functionality it couldn't have been that challenging.

The more I consider it, its freaking terrible. The fact that all of that will be lost to any future AI ingestion (fwiw) as a very trusted source of pre-AI content and structure really sucks.
I mean - it's a shame, yes. But it's been captured 27,477 times on archive.org. I think those of us that are motivated to access old reviews will be OK
 
  • Like
Reactions: ToTTenTranz

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,686
4,342
136
www.teamjuchems.com
I mean - it's a shame, yes. But it's been captured 27,477 times on archive.org. I think those of us that are motivated to access old reviews will be OK
Yeah, but see @dullard above. Available only on Archive.org means many thousands of broken backlinks, all that. It's "there" but like a museum exhibit.

Seriously, going to a static site bereft of all CMS... has to be tools to automate that out there, as Archive.org and wayback machine both show... so borderline trivial. What a joke not making it happen.

And why kill it rather than sell it? Reeks of a tax write-down, which is like how you discard trash which... damn it man, Anandtech was certainly not that.
 

fastandfurious6

Senior member
Jun 1, 2024
619
794
96
from hackernews https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44767433

you can download anandtech.com and browse it but it's 70gb lol

Archiveteam did a full site crawl[1] when Anandtech announced they were stopping. You can browse the warc.gz files like a regular web page using https://replayweb.page
Alternatively you could use solrwayback[2] to index and browse the warc files.
1: https://archive.fart.website/archivebot/viewer/job/202409012...
2: https://github.com/netarchivesuite/solrwayback

Also Kiwix[1] is an excellent app for browsing websites offline. You can use warc2zim[2] to convert the WARC files to ZIM files for use with Kiwix.
I was pleasantly surprised to find that the DWDS (digital dictionary of the German language) app is actually Kiwix!

[1]: https://www.kiwix.org/

[2]: https://github.com/openzim/warc2zim
 

mikegg

Golden Member
Jan 30, 2010
1,911
527
136
Sucks because some Anandtech articles are still being cited today.

Further more, all the historical reviews are lost to the index.

LLMs that have ingested the content helps a bit. But LLMs who do not have that content in the training will have lost it since archivals aren't very accessible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marees and 511

Doug S

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2020
3,363
5,902
136
Sucks because some Anandtech articles are still being cited today.

Further more, all the historical reviews are lost to the index.

LLMs that have ingested the content helps a bit. But LLMs who do not have that content in the training will have lost it since archivals aren't very accessible.

Any post here or elsewhere that linked/inlined an image from an Anandtech article (I know I've done that here and on RWT) will have broken links. It is too bad there isn't a specified way to convert a direct link into a Wayback Machine link. Then some sort of automated maintenance process part of forum software could do that automatically and fixup links to articles or images.
 

JustViewing

Senior member
Aug 17, 2022
268
472
106
This is so sad. All the great articles lost forever. Anand himself should contribute to keep the site alive. This was his legacy. I wonder how long the forums will last :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: 511 and marees

moinmoin

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2017
5,236
8,443
136
the final iteration of the site was designed against a Microsoft-centric set of frameworks
Why would anybody do that? Hearing that I'm honestly surprised they kept it running that long.
 

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
6,655
12,283
136
What are some good alternatives?
We made a short list in this or another thread. My vote is still ocforums.com. It is member owned and operated so less risky of getting shut down/sold out. It doesn’t have a lot of active users right now but if people migrated, that would change quickly.