My mitigation strategy is to buy a very nice 27' boat with a 300HP outboard engine for my family and friends to enjoy on my lake. Planned for 2021 when I trade in my existing smaller boat.
In all seriousness, any mitigation scenario that is practical involves nuclear power. Windmills and solar simply will not sustain an energy intensive economy. Nor will it allow those brown, yellow and black people living in abject poverty to transition to the modern world. The only way they can do that is grid scale 7x24 power plants - preferably CCGT but HEC if needed based on their resources at hand. Intermittent, unreliables may be fine for simple cooking or recharging a cell phone, but to drive an industrial economy and lift these people into a world where they have continuous, reliable access to clean water, health care, food supplies will require much more.
Thank you for a meaningful and intelligent response.
Back of the envelope calculations I did a while back show the entire worlds yearly energy needs could be supplied by the average amount of Uranium we mine and n a year, if we ran them through breeder reactors. This included the energy required to provide the third world a roughly Western European quality of living.
Of course a set of dual axis tracking solar arrays of around 40% efficiency 250KM x 250KM on a side could as well.
As for the third world, reducing poverty should be the goal of any climate mitigation strategy. The first world lower birth rates and reduction in populations means less environmental pressure.
Waiting until they have a grid / infrastructure so they can get fossil fuels is a waste. Small arrays, wind and batteries can and are providing meaningful quality of life improvements today.
I’m not against nuclear on safety grounds but as
@K1052 stated they are unprofitable in the current market. One way to level the playing field would be too force fossil fuel plants to recover all their waste products as the nuclear industry currently does.
Your supposition that intermittent sources can’t sustain an energy intensive economy isn’t correct. The challenges are different but not insurmountable. There isn’t even any new technology that must be developed. Mostly it will be implementing large scale and small scale grid storage.
At work we’ve been running mission and safety critical operations off solar and batteries for 2 decades.
The challenges are merely political not technical.