dphantom
Diamond Member
- Jan 14, 2005
- 4,763
- 326
- 126
Yes. What does that have to do with the statement that cold weather causes more deaths than warm weather.
Did you look at this at all before you posted it?
Yes. What does that have to do with the statement that cold weather causes more deaths than warm weather.
Did you look at this at all before you posted it?
You do realize ENSO events are natural?And the lie detector states that THAT is a lie! aka Trumptruth
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/05/190506111441.htm
warm vs cold in relation to deaths??If you weren’t referring to global warming please state what you were referring to as “a good thing” in your post then.
Yes. What does that have to do with the statement that cold weather causes more deaths than warm weather.
No, I haven't, but I'm pretty sure that doesn't indicate that all 50 million people of population growth are immigrants, which is the statement I'm finding very hard to believe.Absolutely. Perhaps you have not studied the basic principle. Replacement rate.
Overall, the total fertility rate for the United States in 2017 was 1,765.5 per 1,000 women, which was 16% below what is considered the level needed for a population to replace itself: 2,100 births per 1,000 women, according to the report.
I wasn't discussing that at all, our particular argument is the increase in severe weather events that you pretend isn't a thing.Yes. What does that have to do with the statement that cold weather causes more deaths than warm weather.
It’s a sad thing. Many conservatives lie about their posts.warm vs cold in relation to deaths??
You tell 'em, Comrade! Your ignorance is your strength!Yes. What does that have to do with the statement that cold weather causes more deaths than warm weather.
Extreme weather events as defined by NOAA have been increasing since the 70’s.
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/extremes/cei/
now why would I do that? Isn't this the forum where everyone creates false narratives, strawmen and out of context assertions? Besides, I said warming is better and it is. Cold causes more deaths than warmth, hence warmer is better.FYI there’s an edit button so you can go back to post 10# and remove the “It’s a good thing” since what you really meant to say was “Fewer people die in warmer temps than in colder one”
Which per your link I agree with. But you really should go back and change your post since people are confused that you were just stating an unrelated fact and actually had no point to make.
Don't use an old graph, this shit just keeps getting "better" year by year.
Back to this thread and you are still stuck on stupid.now why would I do that? Isn't this the forum where everyone creates false narratives, strawmen and out of context assertions? Besides, I said warming is better and it is. Cold causes more deaths than warmth, hence warmer is better.
Of course too much warmth is bad as is too much cold. I'll let you decide for yourself what is "too much".
There are undoubtedly some good consequences of raising the global temperature a degree or two. What has near zero positive consequences would be run away warming which is what this carbon saturation is supposed to entail.
You're wrong if you think people won't or shouldn't take advantage of a new climate.
No, I haven't, but I'm pretty sure that doesn't indicate that all 50 million people of population growth are immigrants, which is the statement I'm finding very hard to believe.
https://cis.org/Report/Record-445-Million-Immigrants-2017
According to this, there are 44.5 million immigrants total, and looking at different numbers I'm coming up with ~24 million immigrants in the last twenty years, which is altogether more believable.
now why would I do that? Isn't this the forum where everyone creates false narratives, strawmen and out of context assertions? Besides, I said warming is better and it is. Cold causes more deaths than warmth, hence warmer is better.
Of course too much warmth is bad as is too much cold. I'll let you decide for yourself what is "too much".
Pompeo: Melting sea ice presents 'new opportunities for trade'This thread is about Pompeo stating global warming being a good thing.
There has not been an increase in "severe" weather events.
perhaps your definition of global warming is different.This thread is about Pompeo stating global warming being a good thing.
Your statement is about warmth being better than cold. You’ve clarified that your statement should not be assumed to be referring to global warming.
Care to clarify how your post has anything to do with the topic?
Pompeo: Melting sea ice presents 'new opportunities for trade'
Not sure I saw it presented as an argument FOR Global Warming, even though - knowing Republican admins - they probably would reach such a conclusion. It just doesn't seem like they went there on this particular subject. It's a simple proclamation that the Arctic is open and ripe for exploitation. More resources IS a good thing, and the Arctic is going to remain open for business for several generations, if not multiple centuries.
It looks like it hangs out around 4 million births per year.Births below replacement rate literally means our native population is shrinking. Which is a common issue in developed nations.
I'd be hard pressed to believe, in the face of opposing data, that our population grew by 26 million native births.
perhaps your definition of global warming is different.
My statement was that warming is good. I expanded upon the statement that warmth (or heat) kills fewer than cold. And later expanded that warmth to a point was good also.
Then of course all the doomsters come out of the woodwork.
it's fun to see everyone's knee jerk reaction to a simple observational statement.
it shows yet again why this forum is not a place for civil debate when posters have to resort to casting personal aspersions on another.
So a final restatement:
I think the Earth is warming since the end of the LIA ie there is global warming
Warmer temps kill fewer people than cold
Yes. What does that have to do with the statement that cold weather causes more deaths than warm weather.
perhaps your definition of global warming is different.
My statement was that warming is good. I expanded upon the statement that warmth (or heat) kills fewer than cold. And later expanded that warmth to a point was good also.
Then of course all the doomsters come out of the woodwork.
it's fun to see everyone's knee jerk reaction to a simple observational statement.
it shows yet again why this forum is not a place for civil debate when posters have to resort to casting personal aspersions on another.
So a final restatement:
I think the Earth is warming since the end of the LIA ie there is global warming
Warmer temps kill fewer people than cold