NikPreviousAcct
No Lifer
- Aug 15, 2000
- 52,763
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: RaistlinZ
Yeah, what about 0? Given that there is no -0 and that 0 is an even number, there will always be one more even number than odd number.
Bingo.
Originally posted by: RaistlinZ
Yeah, what about 0? Given that there is no -0 and that 0 is an even number, there will always be one more even number than odd number.
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: RaistlinZ
Yeah, what about 0? Given that there is no -0 and that 0 is an even number, there will always be one more even number than odd number.
Bingo.
Starting counting even/odd from zero, then.Originally posted by: RaistlinZ
Yeah, what about 0? Given that there is no -0 and that 0 is an even number, there will always be one more even number than odd number.
Originally posted by: mchammer187
Originally posted by: SinNisTeR
Originally posted by: mchammer187
Originally posted by: SinNisTeR
there are the same amount..
what about rationals vs irrationals?![]()
same
sqrt of any number that is not a perfect square
rationals have a countable infinity, while irrationals do not. there are different types of infinity..![]()
i dont understand how you can count the rationals
.01 .001
.0001 .00001
isn't there an uncountable infinite number of rationals between .01 and .0100000000000000000001
now if you are talking integers that is one thing but rationals is another
