Originally posted by: stardust
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
The only difference between men and boys, is the price of the toys![]()
So does that mean my Acura TL makes me a man?![]()
not sure, but my 350z does :laugh:
Originally posted by: stardust
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
The only difference between men and boys, is the price of the toys![]()
So does that mean my Acura TL makes me a man?![]()
Originally posted by: 9ball
Originally posted by: stardust
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
The only difference between men and boys, is the price of the toys![]()
So does that mean my Acura TL makes me a man?![]()
not sure, but my 350z does :laugh:
I don't think he ever said it'd run (playably) on a GF256, just that it was based on a GF256's feature set.Originally posted by: Acanthus
Carmack has said multiple times that it will run on a geforce 256. So i would imagine you could crank up the details to a decent level and still get good performance.
Oh yeah. Stupid me.That's what I thought, but didn't Half Life ship on October 1998? That's 6 years, unless it's 2006. Maybe I've been out of the loop for a while
Originally posted by: VIAN
Damn, think about it - 8 years for Valve to develop HL2. That is an insane amount of time.
Originally posted by: Cawchy87
Also, did anyone try it when the source code was leaked?
Originally posted by: JEDI
Originally posted by: VIAN
Damn, think about it - 8 years for Valve to develop HL2. That is an insane amount of time.
how in the hell can any gaming company exec justify spending 8years to develop a game? all the $ on enmployees...the game will never make a profit for them
Originally posted by: BugsBunny1078
Originally posted by: JEDI
Originally posted by: VIAN
Damn, think about it - 8 years for Valve to develop HL2. That is an insane amount of time.
how in the hell can any gaming company exec justify spending 8years to develop a game? all the $ on enmployees...the game will never make a profit for them
20 million copies at 50$ a pop.
That is a billion dollars my friend. Even Half Life 1 sold 8 million copies and about 5 times as many people in the world have computers today as did back then. ANyways it has been 5 years in development unless you count all the time on Half Life 1.Which alot of that was convenient to have since alot of stuff is the same or similar.
Originally posted by: JEDI
how in the hell can any gaming company exec justify spending 8years to develop a game? all the $ on enmployees...the game will never make a profit for them
Originally posted by: JEDI
Originally posted by: VIAN
Damn, think about it - 8 years for Valve to develop HL2. That is an insane amount of time.
how in the hell can any gaming company exec justify spending 8years to develop a game? all the $ on enmployees...the game will never make a profit for them
Originally posted by: Evdawg
i hear hl2 is september'ish... but i cant verify that
Originally posted by: stardust
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
The only difference between men and boys, is the price of the toys![]()
So does that mean my Acura TL makes me a man?![]()
Originally posted by: RussianSensation
Originally posted by: Evdawg
i hear hl2 is september'ish... but i cant verify that
September 2nd
Originally posted by: nemesismk2
Originally posted by: RussianSensation
Originally posted by: Evdawg
i hear hl2 is september'ish... but i cant verify that
September 2nd
Wasn't HL2 due for release in September 2003 so please forgive me if I don't believe it will be released this year!![]()
Originally posted by: VIAN
Damn, think about it - 8 years for Valve to develop HL2. That is an insane amount of time.
Originally posted by: RussianSensation
Originally posted by: nemesismk2
Originally posted by: RussianSensation
Originally posted by: Evdawg
i hear hl2 is september'ish... but i cant verify that
September 2nd
Wasn't HL2 due for release in September 2003 so please forgive me if I don't believe it will be released this year!![]()
I meant September 2nd, 2004
Maybe it will be delayed longer, who knows....everything is possible. But i've always stuck to the reasoning that I will not upgrade my videocard until at least a few games I like, that require the firepower, will have come out. So far it's only Far Cry. I can even play UT2K4 at 1280x1024 without problems (albeit without AA/AF). But I am waiting to upgrade until this fall/winter so I can enjoy Doom 3, HL2, STALKER, etc, and Far Cry. Yet so many people bought good videocards long time ago, but since 2 years ago of 9700Pro and until today, except for Far Cry, there hasnt been one game that warranted an upgrade. So while people went from geforce 3 to geforce 4 to 5900/9800pro and now they'll have to upgrade once again to play these intense games, while waiting all this time for something so powerful to take advantage of their cards (that really hasnt come yet until this fall I hope), I will simply jump from 8500 to the new cards today....that is something to think about. Should you upgrade in anticipation of the new game(s) you'd like to play, or only when that game comes out? I think the answer is clear and HL2 is a perfect example.
