Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Originally posted by: Abhi
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Originally posted by: Abhi
For the record, the Optional Insurance I offered would have costed him the equivalent of USD 1.7 extra.
No, no, no! It would have cost YOU $1.70. Just because the buyer paid for you to ship it doesn't mean HE shipped it, you did.
Phoenix, I do agree with you in bits and parts,.
But if that is totally true, the
Optional insurance tab offered by ebay is useless?
Perhaps... I'm not 100% familiar with e-bay's rules, so I won't comment on those. From a general buyer-seller transaction, the seller is responsible for shipping.
Originally posted by: BigJ
Wrong. By bidding on an auction, you agree to the terms of the auction. If the seller said they are not responsible for the package arriving if you don't purchase insurance, then they're not responsible.
Part of the terms of the auction is that the buyer receives the item in the auction, no? Did they? Nope.
Originally posted by: pontifex
you don't see a difference between a huge company with huge inventory and multiples of the same item and a 1st time selller who is selling their personal item online (which they only have 1 of)?
so if you were selling, say a new video card that cost $300 and you shipped it and they guy didn't want insurance, you would go out and buy another $300 video and just send it to the guy? that means you lost the item you were trying to sell and the money you made off of it by selling it.
There IS no difference. Volume doesn't change responsibility or liability. You don't become liable for shipping when sales = X volume. The idea is ridiculous.
Fact is, I always insure things I ship unless I don't care if they get lost. I wouldn't be in this mess because it would have been insured.
Folks imagine if you will someone who WANTS to scam people on e-bay. You really don't want the buyer being responsible for shipping.
Fvck, what if it was improperly packaged, is that also the buyers fault? Sheesh people.