Small Ebay query (with *POLL*)

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,644
10
81
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Originally posted by: pontifex
but he doesn't have to prove *what* was shipped, he just has to prove he shipped something.
See edit above.

yeah but is this guy an online vendor? most likely he's just some guy trying to get rid of stuff he doesn't need.
fvck if i'm going to go out and buy another item to send to someone because the mail or shipping company screwed up.
Now your mincing words... Yes, he sold something online, therefore he's an online vendor.

This is no different than buying a book on Amazon and not receiveing it, then having Amazon say "welp, tough sh!t, we shipped it, sorry you didn't get it".
 

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,644
10
81
Originally posted by: Abhi
For the record, the Optional Insurance I offered would have costed him the equivalent of USD 1.7 extra.

No, no, no! It would have cost YOU $1.70. Just because the buyer paid for you to ship it doesn't mean HE shipped it, you did.
 

Abhi

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2003
4,548
0
76
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Originally posted by: Abhi
For the record, the Optional Insurance I offered would have costed him the equivalent of USD 1.7 extra.

No, no, no! It would have cost YOU $1.70. Just because the buyer paid for you to ship it doesn't mean HE shipped it, you did.


Phoenix, I do agree with you in bits and parts,.

But if that is totally true, the Optional insurance tab offered by ebay is useless?

 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Originally posted by: Abhi
For the record, the Optional Insurance I offered would have costed him the equivalent of USD 1.7 extra.

No, no, no! It would have cost YOU $1.70. Just because the buyer paid for you to ship it doesn't mean HE shipped it, you did.

Wrong. By bidding on an auction, you agree to the terms of the auction. If the seller said they are not responsible for the package arriving if you don't purchase insurance, then they're not responsible.
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: Abhi
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Originally posted by: Abhi
For the record, the Optional Insurance I offered would have costed him the equivalent of USD 1.7 extra.

No, no, no! It would have cost YOU $1.70. Just because the buyer paid for you to ship it doesn't mean HE shipped it, you did.


Phoenix, I do agree with you in bits and parts,.

But if that is totally true, the Optional insurance tab offered by ebay is useless?

Another good point.
 

Dedpuhl

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
10,370
0
76
Insurance should always be the buyer's responsibility on eBay. You offered insurance. He didn't want it. He's screwed...especially since you have proof that something was sent to him.
 

Gillbot

Lifer
Jan 11, 2001
28,830
17
81
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
edit: Folks, imagine if you will the same purchase from an online vendor, and you are the buyer. So here are a few Qs.

Are you EVER offered insurace? No. Why? Because the SELLER is already paying for it to protect thelselves.

What would you expect if you bought an item from an online vendor and didn't receive it? That's right, you'd expect another item to be shipped to you, ASAP to, right?

Being this transaction is in India, I have no idea what the laws around this are, so YMMV.

+1

he bought an item from you, he never got it. You are responsible for getting it to him.

I hate these stupid ebay/insurance loopholes. I offer it but if they refuse, I get it anyway. No point in me taking a risk that they claim it never arrived.
 

Mark R

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
8,513
16
81
Unless stated otherwise, the buyer pays for the item to be delivered to them in a satisfactory condition. It is, therefore, the *seller's* responsibility to deliver the item to the buyer in that satisfactory condition.

If the item is lost or damaged in the post, it is up the seller to put it right.

Shipping insurance protects the seller, not the buyer. The seller is obligated to protect the investment of the buyer anyway. The purpose of the insurance is to reimburse the seller for the costs to him if the item is lost.

If you are a seller, it is very unwise to make insurance optional. If you can't get a good deal from your shipping provider, then you may be better off self-insuring. This is what I did when I used to sell little electronic gadgets. I'd tack a bit onto the shipping cost, and put it aside. On the occasion when an item got lost, I'd simply send another at my expense - paid for by the surcharge.

I suppose that if you had stated very clearly in the auction that the buyer is to arrange shipping, and that the buyer assumes full responsibility for the item at the time it is paid for - then you could argue that a lost item is the buyer's problem. However, this is certainly not the normal state of affairs.
 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,804
46
91
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Originally posted by: pontifex
but he doesn't have to prove *what* was shipped, he just has to prove he shipped something.
See edit above.

yeah but is this guy an online vendor? most likely he's just some guy trying to get rid of stuff he doesn't need.
fvck if i'm going to go out and buy another item to send to someone because the mail or shipping company screwed up.
Now your mincing words... Yes, he sold something online, therefore he's an online vendor.

This is no different than buying a book on Amazon and not receiveing it, then having Amazon say "welp, tough sh!t, we shipped it, sorry you didn't get it".

you don't see a difference between a huge company with huge inventory and multiples of the same item and a 1st time selller who is selling their personal item online (which they only have 1 of)?

so if you were selling, say a new video card that cost $300 and you shipped it and they guy didn't want insurance, you would go out and buy another $300 video and just send it to the guy? that means you lost the item you were trying to sell and the money you made off of it by selling it.
 

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,644
10
81
Originally posted by: Abhi
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Originally posted by: Abhi
For the record, the Optional Insurance I offered would have costed him the equivalent of USD 1.7 extra.

No, no, no! It would have cost YOU $1.70. Just because the buyer paid for you to ship it doesn't mean HE shipped it, you did.


Phoenix, I do agree with you in bits and parts,.

But if that is totally true, the Optional insurance tab offered by ebay is useless?
Perhaps... I'm not 100% familiar with e-bay's rules, so I won't comment on those. From a general buyer-seller transaction, the seller is responsible for shipping.

Originally posted by: BigJ
Wrong. By bidding on an auction, you agree to the terms of the auction. If the seller said they are not responsible for the package arriving if you don't purchase insurance, then they're not responsible.
Part of the terms of the auction is that the buyer receives the item in the auction, no? Did they? Nope.

Originally posted by: pontifex
you don't see a difference between a huge company with huge inventory and multiples of the same item and a 1st time selller who is selling their personal item online (which they only have 1 of)?

so if you were selling, say a new video card that cost $300 and you shipped it and they guy didn't want insurance, you would go out and buy another $300 video and just send it to the guy? that means you lost the item you were trying to sell and the money you made off of it by selling it.
There IS no difference. Volume doesn't change responsibility or liability. You don't become liable for shipping when sales = X volume. The idea is ridiculous.

Fact is, I always insure things I ship unless I don't care if they get lost. I wouldn't be in this mess because it would have been insured.

Folks imagine if you will someone who WANTS to scam people on e-bay. You really don't want the buyer being responsible for shipping.

Fvck, what if it was improperly packaged, is that also the buyers fault? Sheesh people.
 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,804
46
91
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Originally posted by: Abhi
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Originally posted by: Abhi
For the record, the Optional Insurance I offered would have costed him the equivalent of USD 1.7 extra.

No, no, no! It would have cost YOU $1.70. Just because the buyer paid for you to ship it doesn't mean HE shipped it, you did.


Phoenix, I do agree with you in bits and parts,.

But if that is totally true, the Optional insurance tab offered by ebay is useless?
Perhaps... I'm not 100% familiar with e-bay's rules, so I won't comment on those. From a general buyer-seller transaction, the seller is responsible for shipping.

Originally posted by: BigJ
Wrong. By bidding on an auction, you agree to the terms of the auction. If the seller said they are not responsible for the package arriving if you don't purchase insurance, then they're not responsible.
Part of the terms of the auction is that the buyer receives the item in the auction, no? Did they? Nope.

Originally posted by: pontifex
you don't see a difference between a huge company with huge inventory and multiples of the same item and a 1st time selller who is selling their personal item online (which they only have 1 of)?

so if you were selling, say a new video card that cost $300 and you shipped it and they guy didn't want insurance, you would go out and buy another $300 video and just send it to the guy? that means you lost the item you were trying to sell and the money you made off of it by selling it.
There IS no difference. Volume doesn't change responsibility or liability. You don't become liable for shipping when sales = X volume. The idea is ridiculous.

Fact is, I always insure things I ship unless I don't care if they get lost. I wouldn't be in this mess because it would have been insured.

Folks imagine if you will someone who WANTS to scam people on e-bay. You really don't want the buyer being responsible for shipping.

Fvck, what if it was improperly packaged, is that also the buyers fault? Sheesh people.

so if you were selling, say a new video card that cost $300 and you shipped it and they guy didn't want insurance, you would go out and buy another $300 video and just send it to the guy and totally lose out on the whole thing?
 

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,644
10
81
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Fact is, I always insure things I ship unless I don't care if they get lost. I wouldn't be in this mess because it would have been insured.

so if you were selling, say a new video card that cost $300 and you shipped it and they guy didn't want insurance, you would go out and buy another $300 video and just send it to the guy and totally lose out on the whole thing?
Dude, read what I posted. I wouldn't ship w/o insurance.

edit: and if for some screwed upu reason I didn't, I would refund 100% of the $ back to the buyer.
 

Stuxnet

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2005
8,392
1
0
Originally posted by: Yossarian
Originally posted by: Papagayo
Would Amazon say "Tough Luck!"?

no, but I would as a small fry ebay seller.

Exactly. I'm not Amazon.

The buyer made a CONSCIOUS DECISION to pass on the insurance to reduce his bottom line. His decision = his loss.

Period.

If the seller didn't offer insurance, it would be an entirely different ballgame, but that's not the case here.
 

Drakkon

Diamond Member
Aug 14, 2001
8,401
1
0
you are liable for getting the package there insurance or not. Its your fault if the carrier losses the package as YOU chose that company to get the item to the seller.

If he files a paypal claim the funds will be deducted from your account as if you had no tracking info paypal will not be your friend.
 

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,758
603
126
Originally posted by: Gillbot
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
edit: Folks, imagine if you will the same purchase from an online vendor, and you are the buyer. So here are a few Qs.

Are you EVER offered insurace? No. Why? Because the SELLER is already paying for it to protect thelselves.

What would you expect if you bought an item from an online vendor and didn't receive it? That's right, you'd expect another item to be shipped to you, ASAP to, right?

Being this transaction is in India, I have no idea what the laws around this are, so YMMV.

+1

he bought an item from you, he never got it. You are responsible for getting it to him.

I hate these stupid ebay/insurance loopholes. I offer it but if they refuse, I get it anyway. No point in me taking a risk that they claim it never arrived.

I'd just roll it into the "handling" cost and force them to pay for it whether they want it or not. Then you won't get into this situation in the first place!
 

GeneValgene

Diamond Member
Sep 18, 2002
3,884
0
76
Originally posted by: Drakkon
you are liable for getting the package there insurance or not. Its your fault if the carrier losses the package as YOU chose that company to get the item to the seller.

If he files a paypal claim the funds will be deducted from your account as if you had no tracking info paypal will not be your friend.

yes, if the buyer makes a claim against you, you are screwed...if you do not have a tracking number, ebay/paypal will always side with buyer
 

kravmaga

Senior member
Aug 10, 2005
264
0
0
Do you have any way to prove the package was lost and that you didn't just decide to not ship it out of the blue? Paypal/ebay's recourse for things of this nature is to ask for proof that you shipped the item, without it the buyer will get his money back. This is the reason I always pay the extra $1 to get a signature confirmation on my packages.
 

ZoomStop

Senior member
Oct 10, 2005
841
0
76
I agree with what the line of thought that you should require insurance.
But I also know that a very small percentage of mail is actually lost and that a great majority of the time it is some a-hole who got the item and then decided to say they never got it.
So for a start I would offer to refund 1/2 or 1/3 of the money and make it sound like it is all you can do. If they are truly trying to rip you off they'll jump on this. If they truly did not get the phone though then they will press for a full refund and in that case give it to them.
But the odds are great this guy is enjoying his new phone and is just trying to see if he can get his money back too.
 

dethman

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
10,263
3
76
insurance by sellers is bullcrap. they should be obligated to get the package to the seller, which means insurance should already be included in shipping, handling, and charged. offering 'optional' insurance i've always thought is a scam.
 

Abhi

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2003
4,548
0
76
Originally posted by: Schfifty Five
Your title is wrong: Seller has paid? Should be 'buyer' has paid and 'buyer' not opt for insurance.

Oops.. fixed..
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Here's my final opinion:

You should ship with insurance anyway.

If a buyer purchases insurance with the deal, and it gets lost, the buyer gets an immediate refund and you dispute the claim with whatever carrier.
If a buyer DOES NOT purchase insurance when it is offered and it gets lost, the buyer gets a refund only after the claim with whatever carrier is settled.

If they were too cheap to purchase insurance, why should you tie up your money and item while it's getting settled?
 

Kelemvor

Lifer
May 23, 2002
16,928
8
81
Originally posted by: BigJ
Here's my final opinion:

You should ship with insurance anyway.

If a buyer purchases insurance with the deal, and it gets lost, the buyer gets an immediate refund and you dispute the claim with whatever carrier.
If a buyer DOES NOT purchase insurance when it is offered and it gets lost, the buyer gets a refund only after the claim with whatever carrier is settled.

If they were too cheap to purchase insurance, why should you tie up your money and item while it's getting settled?

Actually I think your statement is backwards....

I've always been told it's the buyer's responsibility to fight with the insurance because the package was heading to them. Once you ship it, you give the buyer the tracking Info and you're done. If it doens't get there, he takes that info to the shipping co to get the insurance info paid back.

Buyer pays and gets insurance, Shipper Ships withInsurance, Shipper gives tracking info to buyer, buyer's responsibility for anything else that happens.
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: FrankyJunior
Originally posted by: BigJ
Here's my final opinion:

You should ship with insurance anyway.

If a buyer purchases insurance with the deal, and it gets lost, the buyer gets an immediate refund and you dispute the claim with whatever carrier.
If a buyer DOES NOT purchase insurance when it is offered and it gets lost, the buyer gets a refund only after the claim with whatever carrier is settled.

If they were too cheap to purchase insurance, why should you tie up your money and item while it's getting settled?

Actually I think your statement is backwards....

I've always been told it's the buyer's responsibility to fight with the insurance because the package was heading to them. Once you ship it, you give the buyer the tracking Info and you're done. If it doens't get there, he takes that info to the shipping co to get the insurance info paid back.

Buyer pays and gets insurance, Shipper Ships withInsurance, Shipper gives tracking info to buyer, buyer's responsibility for anything else that happens.

It was a compromise between the people saying the buyer is 100% responsible and the seller is 100% responsible.
 

ZoomStop

Senior member
Oct 10, 2005
841
0
76
Insurance claims are the responsibility of the person who paid for the shipping/insurance.
The buyer may have paid you, but the seller pays the carrier.

Works the same way with freight. If I ship out a truck of product to ABC Inc freight prepaid (it gets charged to my corporate account with the carrier) and there is loss/breakage on the load then it is up to my company to take it up with the carrier.

Now if I ship it freight collect and the shipping charges are either paid upon delivery by the customer or get billed to the customers account and there is loss/breakage then it is up to the customer to negotiate insurance (which, trust me, pisses them off to no end).

There is always the ability to stipulate a FOB point, but that gets a bit more complicated. Parcel shipments work the same way in regards to insurance though. Unless the winning bidder supplied a UPS/FedEx account number to bill shipping charges to, it is up to the seller to file insurance paperwork.