• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Sketchers fined 40 million over 'Shape Ups'

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bateluer

Lifer
http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/16/us/ftc-skechers-fine/index.html?hpt=hp_bn1

Washington (CNN) -- For overweight Americans, and those looking for a healthier lifestyle, the claim was almost too good to be true -- wear Skechers Shape-ups footwear and watch the pounds melt away. At a news conference Wednesday, the Federal Trade Commission said the shoemaker's claims weren't true and alleged Skechers violated federal law by misleading consumers.

According to the FTC, Skechers agreed to pay a hefty $40 million fine to settle charges the California-based company deceived consumers by making "unfounded claims that Shape-ups would help people lose weight, and strengthen and tone their buttocks, legs and abdominal muscles."

The company enlisted high profile celebrities Kim Kardashian and Brooke Burke to sell the shoes.

Besides Shape-ups, Skechers also made deceptive claims about other products including Resistance Runner, Toners and Tone-up shoes, the FTC alleges.

"Skechers' unfounded claims went beyond stronger and more toned muscles. The company even made claims about weight loss and cardiovascular health," said David Vladeck, director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection.

As part of the settlement, customers who bought Skechers "toning" shoes will be eligible for refunds either directly from the FTC or through a court-approved class action lawsuit, officials said.

Wednesday's announcement was the culmination of a months-long investigation involving the FTC and attorneys general from 44 states and the District of Columbia.

FTC officials highlighted a Skechers television ad featuring the endorsement of chiropractor Dr. Steven Gautreau. In the ad Gautreau cited an "independent" clinical study he conducted testing the shoes' benefits.

The FTC said the study results Gautreau promoted weren't factual, and alleged the company hid the fact that Gautreau is married to a Skechers marketing executive. The FTC also said Gautreau was compensated for his endorsement, which wasn't made clear in the commercial.

Skechers introduced Shape-ups in 2009, and sales peaked a year later. The FTC called Skechers an industry leader in the booming business of toning footwear. Estimated sales were close to $1 billion industrywide in 2010, the FTC said. The toning shoes Skechers sold cost between $60 and $100 a pair.

As part of an expensive campaign to promote the fitness benefits of Shape-ups, the company unveiled a scantly dressed Kim Kardashian peddling the shoes during the Super Bowl in 2011.

Brooke Burke's ads claimed the shoes would help improve her cousin's posture, mother's legs and give her brother a tighter core. Additionally, Burke's ad told consumers "the newest way to burn calories and tone and strengthen muscles was to tie their Shape-up shoe laces," the FTC said.

"The FTC's message, for Skechers and other national advertisers, is to shape up your substantiation or tone down your claims," Vladeck said.

Under the FTC's settlement, the company is barred from any advertising making similar claims unless it's backed up by scientific evidence.

What Skechers plans to do with the Shape-ups brand remains to be seen. An ad featuring Burke touting "the next generation of Shape-ups" remained on the company's website Wednesday morning.

According to the FTC, the commission files a complaint when it has "reason to believe" that the law has been or is being violated. The FTC says despite Skechers agreement to pay a fine, the complaint is not a court ruling or an admission that the company violated any law.

Not unexpected. Their claims were complete BS from the very beginning. I can't remember if I posted a thread about the lady who needed reconstructive surgery from the Shape Up shoes or not.

There are no short cuts to fitness. You cannot simply where a pair of shoes, or a magnetic bracelet, or even eat healthy goods. Its a complete package.
 
They may be unfounded claims but the irony is that they are still awesome shoes that many find extremely comfortable and great for walking, including the wifey.
 
If stupid people aren't a valid demographic to pursue then why are chiropractors and casinos allowed to exist?

There are no short cuts to fitness. You cannot simply where a pair of shoes, or a magnetic bracelet, or even eat healthy goods. Its a complete package.

You're probably just saying that because you have too many toxins. Here, you can get them out through your feet http://www.wheatgrasskits.com/footpatch.htm?gdftrk=gdfV21874_a_7c241_a_7c1930_a_7cF5_d_72
 
If you buy the shoes and then use the shoes to go walking and burn calories, don't they still do the job? 😛

I'm pretty sure everything single "As Seen on TV" exercise machine works too...if people would actually use them.
 
They may be unfounded claims but the irony is that they are still awesome shoes that many find extremely comfortable and great for walking, including the wifey.

They essentially nullify normal walking patterns. With normal feet and normal shoes, you rock from the heel to the midfoot to the forefoot. When your heel hits the ground, it creates what's called the heel rocker, which the Shape Ups exaggerate quite a bit. The bad thing about that is that you don't use your normal ankle range of motion (particularly dorsiflexion). In addition, you're supposed to progress to your forefoot onto your big toe, which tensions up connective tissue within the foot (plantar fascia, flexor hallucis longus) for support. Without the forefoot rocker mechanism (Windlass mechanism), the way you progress to your next step is modified. These shoes were originally and are still used as an orthosis (i.e. shoe modified) for people with pathologies. It should NOT be used for people who are completely normal. I'd actually go on to say that it puts you at increased risk of injury due to the lack of passive support of the joints within the foot. When you lose tension in the foot, you lose everything. They're crappy shoes that aren't meant for normal people.
 
They essentially nullify normal walking patterns. With normal feet and normal shoes, you rock from the heel to the midfoot to the forefoot. When your heel hits the ground, it creates what's called the heel rocker, which the Shape Ups exaggerate quite a bit. The bad thing about that is that you don't use your normal ankle range of motion (particularly dorsiflexion). In addition, you're supposed to progress to your forefoot onto your big toe, which tensions up connective tissue within the foot (plantar fascia, flexor hallucis longus) for support. Without the forefoot rocker mechanism (Windlass mechanism), the way you progress to your next step is modified. These shoes were originally and are still used as an orthosis (i.e. shoe modified) for people with pathologies. It should NOT be used for people who are completely normal. I'd actually go on to say that it puts you at increased risk of injury due to the lack of passive support of the joints within the foot. When you lose tension in the foot, you lose everything. They're crappy shoes that aren't meant for normal people.

Interesting analysis, thanks.
 
Last edited:
No idea on the Sketch-ups or whatever, but do have a pair of MBTs that are...interesting. I'm sure everyone was trying to cash in on the MBT shoes, which actually do HAVE scientific testing with clinical trials and such. Then again they normally run over $200.

They feel different, and aren't made for running. And you aren't going to lose weight just by wearing them while eating cake in front of your computer. But wearing them walking or light jogs, I can certainly feel how much more...exertion it takes to stay balanced. Kind of like standing on a medicine ball. I went back to regular running shoes FWIW and my MBTs are collecting dust.
 
I knew they were a gimmick with fraudulent claims when I first laid eyes on them. Very glad to see the manufacturer is being fined for deluding the public.
 
I have a love/hate relationship with mine. For walking longer distances, my knees seem much less sore wearing these shoes than "normal" athletic shoes.

However, because they're so thick, the soles don't flex at all, so the shoe wants to slide down my heel as my weight shifts to the front part of my foot. I get horrible blisters on my heels after wearing them for any length of time.
 
I have a love/hate relationship with mine. For walking longer distances, my knees seem much less sore wearing these shoes than "normal" athletic shoes.

However, because they're so thick, the soles don't flex at all, so the shoe wants to slide down my heel as my weight shifts to the front part of my foot. I get horrible blisters on my heels after wearing them for any length of time.

Lol...
SUCKER
 
I have a love/hate relationship with mine. For walking longer distances, my knees seem much less sore wearing these shoes than "normal" athletic shoes.

However, because they're so thick, the soles don't flex at all, so the shoe wants to slide down my heel as my weight shifts to the front part of my foot. I get horrible blisters on my heels after wearing them for any length of time.

Good athletic shoes are designed to move and flex with the feet, almost like a second skin, and help with a natural gait. The Shape Ups try to alter that gait, leading to the mentioned health and medical problems. Might want to dump the Shape Ups and get a good pair of Brooks. 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top