• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Sister-In-Law wants to have his Kid

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Sheepathon
Incest taboo, anyone?

I don't think this is incest. They aren't blood, only family by marriage. But though not taboo, I'm sure this would be frowned upon if it came up more often.

Originally posted by: Stojakapimp
So that kid and his/her cousin will have the same dad? kinda weird if you ask me

Which would make them brothers/sisters. Very strange, if they know. Very weird if it stays a secret.



I got to go on my date, my gf is going to love this story. lol.
 
I got some info as I've been through a similar situation.

Email to a friend when I was searching for answers regarding this topic... (I had just asked her if I could ask her a for advice, she says sure)

Okay, here goes... Not including sperm banks, I've never had a child. Well that could all change this year, my friend (well just call her trinity) wants a baby and it's either me or the sperm bank. There are lots of things to consider such as my emotional attachment to the child but I will not go after custody rights and will not be required to pay child support. It's an interesting offer and my guy friends are all happy for me, but it seems that every woman I talk to has this really negative reaction except for my sister who is friends with this person. This would include my mom who I haven't talked to but she already flipped out about the idea that she's probably got hundreds of grandchildren she doesn't know about through the spermbank and in this case she would not be happy that I have givin up my rights to the child. I think there is some sexual tension between my female friends and I which may contribute to some of the negative responses I've been getting which is one of the reasons why I'm asking you. Basically, I want to do it cause I want help my friend and it would also be neat to get a taste of having a little me run around without having to settle down I suppose. The woman I talk to seem to think that I have commitment issues as it is and think that there is something wrong with being able to not be apart of their childs life. I can understand that especially from a womans perspective. My main concern besides my mother is that if I meet future women and they find out that I did this, that regardless of the good intentions and the reasons, they may somehow feel like the women I have in my life now. I can't lie about this sort of thing and I certainly don't want the child to greatly limit my future relationships, any thoughts?

I asked the right woman, she totally supports my decision and she, if she were to meet me would not have an issue BUT, this is an unusally awesome woman that I have asked for advice. You notice that one of my concerns is about the women I meet in the future having an emotional response to the idea that somehow I don't support my children or have attachment, very important as women tend to be more emotional about such things for genetic purposes (another topic)

Here is why I didn't do it...

- I don't know where you live but in many if not all states and certainly california, the courts rule in favor of the child which means that IF she want's to sue you for child support she can. (this didn't apply to me cause the friend who wanted me to do this is super cool and wouldn't do it, yeah yeah, you think I'm a chump for being trust worthy but BELIEVE ME I'm not that guy and if you knew us you would understand that and that she is one of the few women who I can trust completely.) You say, "mero, couldn't you have her family sign a contract to "hold harmless" your child support fees?" No, the hold harmless clause does not apply to these sort of cases.
- This is my killer, the child can come after my estate when I die even if I write him out of my will. I would probably win but I would be required to pay for his legal fees in persuit of my estate which could cost hundreds of thousands of dollars.
- For me, this is a friend of my sisters. My mother (high powered attorney) would never forgive me for giving up legal rights to her grandchild. I could imagine my sister getting pissed off and telling my mom in a fit of rage about my "bastard" child so there would be no hiding such a situation. My mother and I are closer to one another in many respects than any two people I know putting such a situation in difficult terratory.

Man, I don't think I have ever been so open with a forum to help someone else out but I'm just letting you know what the risks are. Please forgive me if I have offended anyone.

/I support you doing this as I believe it's a wonderful thing to see a little you run around, it broke my heart to have made the decision not to have the child. I just wanted you to appreciate the complexity of the situation before you make the decision.
 
Originally posted by: Sphexi
Originally posted by: Landroval
As a woman, I would not be happy about my husband donating his sperm to a relative. It's mine! ALL mine! 😉 Frankly, the sister-in-law can get it from a bank, a friend, David Crosby, or she can adopt.

:Q


hey, if it worked for Etheridge, it can work for Murphy Brown
 
Originally posted by: stringcheeseincident
hahahah my mom has this picture of her and a few friends and David Crosby, she met him at a concert a while back...she put it up on our fridge and likes to tell people i'm the product of her and David's one night stand because i sort of look like him. all this craziness kind of fits in a thread like this.

Well, it's goood that you can find humor in that.

If I had a Mom who was like that I would disown her.
 
whoa whoa whoa... if he is called father by her and the kids and doesn't deny it he is admitted paternity and can be sued for child support! no way in hell should he do it!
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
whoa whoa whoa... if he is called father by her and the kids and doesn't deny it he is admitted paternity and can be sued for child support! no way in hell should he do it!

He could easily write up a contract or something.
 
He should have talked to his wife about this first, even before deciding himself if he wanted to go through with it or not. As for who should ask her, I think it should be the sister because she's the one that first brought up the idea.
 
"Hey mom, can we go over and see Uncle John, err dad, and my cousins, err brothers and sisters?"

CBS TV movie of the week!
 
Originally posted by: x04d DaY
Originally posted by: ElFenix
whoa whoa whoa... if he is called father by her and the kids and doesn't deny it he is admitted paternity and can be sued for child support! no way in hell should he do it!

He could easily write up a contract or something.

unless he gets the best lawyer in the world, they can easily be invalidated.
 
What a horrible idea. It will cause fights with his wive later on down the road for sure. Of course he will have a sense of loyalty to the kid. And then it will be jealousy between sisters. Fights all around.

Plus... how the hell do you tell your kids... this is your brother AND your cousin!!! ...??? Cause daddy had children with mom AND her sister. Donation or not, this is a horrible idea?

What in the world is he thinking? And how in the world can he think this is a good idea?

sheesh!
 
This is such a bad idea on so many fronts.

He'll have to see his child regularly yet will not be the traditional father.
His wife will always know that child is her husband's but it won't be hers.
The sister-in-law wants to have a child only because she's scared she won't have any, which is a horrible reason.
The child will be forever in a very awkward, difficult to understand situation, because the sister-in-law wants to have the father around yet won't be married (or ever was married) to him. What do you call that, "Dad light"?

I would urge him in the strongest possible terms to turn her down BEFORE he tells his wife. That way his wife won't ever have to think he was seriously considering this ridiculous idea.

If she really wants a child, let her adopt one. Then she will have to convince an adoption agency that her motives are in line with what a child needs, and her reason isn't just that "everyone else has a child".

And none of this has anything to do with whether she's a queen bitch or not.
 
Originally posted by: x04d DaY
Originally posted by: ElFenix
whoa whoa whoa... if he is called father by her and the kids and doesn't deny it he is admitted paternity and can be sued for child support! no way in hell should he do it!

He could easily write up a contract or something.

Hah, you can't write a contract to get yourself out of child support payments. You simply don't have the power to do that in any state. And as I said in my last post, you cannot use the hold harmless clause either.

I still think it's a little strange to have the child in the family like others are pointing out. I would really think about that before I went in to it.
 
Kid to his/her GF/BF in their teens, "I'd like you to meet Jim, he's my uncle daddy."

I say the wench needs to hit the sperm banks & find an anonymous donor, or heaven fvcking forbid adopt a child.
 
Bad idea in so many ways it's ridiculous. Put yourself in the prospective kid's shoes. You've been told you have a dad but you can't treat him like a dad because he's also your uncle? That's got potential to seriously mess up that kid's head all because some selfish bitch wants a kid and can't be bothered to have a normal relationship to get one.
 
NO!!!

A child is a 110% commitment, and needs both strong mother and strong father images.

That woman is a selfish idiot.
 
Back
Top