SIRIUS radio

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

altonb1

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2002
6,432
0
71
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: BDawg

Wow, so only 2 years behind?

As an XM user, I would try to steer you to XM. Whatever you get though, try to get a direct connect kit so you can plug directly into your receiver instead of using the ungodly horrid tape deck adpater or fm modulator.

In all fairness I imagine it will be a much better unit than the MyFi (based on the excellent design of the S50). I haven't seen a single review of the MyFi that didn't pick it apart for its spotty reception. I don't see this as XM's fault, exactly, in that satellite broadcasting generally requires line-of-sight, but they are the ones who brought it to market. I will be curious whether Sirius can do better. Theoretically I guess their "statistical multiplexing" and ground repeaters may help, but I have to wonder whether a portable satellite radio can ever work flawlessly.

Personally I am a huge Stern fan, and would never have considered XM, but obviously YMMV. It seems to me XM's loss of truly commercial-free music (apparently an outgrowth of their partial ownership by Clear Channel) would be annoying, as well. To each, his own, in any case.

But they still have MORE commercial-free channels than Sirius. When the channels that added commercials went live, XM also added several additional new commercial-free stations at the same time to offset the commercials.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: altonb1

But they still have MORE commercial-free channels than Sirius. When the channels that added commercials went live, XM also added several additional new commercial-free stations at the same time to offset the commercials.

Touche. I would still be wary of the intervention of Clear Channel, however. I must admit, though, that if it weren't for Howard I would almost certainly never have subscribed to either, and I don't know that adding commercials to a handful of XM channels would have deterred me were I leaning that way.

It seems to me that Sirius is, at this point, hungrier, and they are making the rights moves from a business standpoint. Sirius is definitely the hotter item at retail, and XM recently had to back away from its EOY sales projections. We shall see. Honestly it wouldn't bother me to see them merge, but at this point I am happy rooting for the little guy.
 
Dec 4, 2002
18,211
1
0
Originally posted by: BDawg
Originally posted by: Mike
This X-mas Sirius will release a portable unit much like XM's Myfi. The S50 was not a competitor to the MyFi, but this guy will be. I am told much better, though no one could tell me in what way, so take that with a grain of salt.

Wow, so only 2 years behind?

As an XM user, I would try to steer you to XM. Whatever you get though, try to get a direct connect kit so you can plug directly into your receiver instead of using the ungodly horrid tape deck adpater or fm modulator.

Have you used the Myfi? Have you used Sirius? The MyFi was garbage. It was worthless as a portable unit. If you had it docked in your car, or docked at home you were good to go....which is what every other Sat Radio receiver can do. Well worth the initial $330 MSRP. :roll:
 
Dec 4, 2002
18,211
1
0
People, we're talking about 67 channels VS 69 channel. For you to choose a Sat radio company, you need to look at the music. Personally, I think Sirius has better music stations. Not everyone is going to agree with me. Then you add NFL & NBA? No contest IMO.

This whole "most commercial-free music in satellite radio" is just for bragging rights. Again, like most things in life, it's about quality, not quantity.