• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Sinclair Broadcast Group to show kerry documentary

Originally posted by: wiin
Democrats have no problem with michael moore showing 'Fahrenheit' on election eve
Michael Moore, Network Plans Election Eve TV 'Fahrenheit' Showing . They do, however, have a problem with Sinclair's plan to air documentary about kerry Democratic Party and 18 senators oppose Sinclair's plan to air documentary abour kerry.

So... A movie that has been released on DVD will be put on pay-per-view shouldn't have less issues than a network station preempting its programming for a documentary?

I'm not saying one documetary is more right(or wrong), but let's put a little logic into the argument.(unless Sinclair only owns pay stations, which I'll be the first to admit I know little about what Sinclair owns)
 
Originally posted by: Strk
So... A movie that has been released on DVD will be put on pay-per-view shouldn't have less issues than a network station preempting its programming for a documentary?

I'm not saying one documetary is more right(or wrong), but let's put a little logic into the argument.(unless Sinclair only owns pay stations, which I'll be the first to admit I know little about what Sinclair owns)
Only reason F 9/11 isn't airing on public stations is because Moore can't get the rights from his DVD publisher. This is a repost, btw.
 
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: Strk
So... A movie that has been released on DVD will be put on pay-per-view shouldn't have less issues than a network station preempting its programming for a documentary?

I'm not saying one documetary is more right(or wrong), but let's put a little logic into the argument.(unless Sinclair only owns pay stations, which I'll be the first to admit I know little about what Sinclair owns)
Only reason F 9/11 isn't airing on public stations is because Moore can't get the rights from his DVD publisher. This is a repost, btw.

I'm not surprised.(he essentially encouraged people to download it, so why wouldn't he want it on network tv?) But the fact remains, it's not going on a network station.
 
Originally posted by: Strk
I'm not surprised.(he essentially encouraged people to download it, so why wouldn't he want it on network tv?) But the fact remains, it's not going on a network station.
So, since he screwed up and signed a contract restricting the broadcast rights, his opposition should hold back their own film?
 
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: Strk
I'm not surprised.(he essentially encouraged people to download it, so why wouldn't he want it on network tv?) But the fact remains, it's not going on a network station.
So, since he screwed up and signed a contract restricting the broadcast rights, his opposition should hold back their own film?

Did I say that? Did I say I'm for airing either documentary on network television on the day of the election?(or near it) No, I didn't.

If people want to see either documentary, go for it, but on network television during an election.(let's face it, either documentary can be considered an advertisement)
 
If this documentarty is ANTI-Kerry shouldn't it be seen as a campaign advertisement and be subjected to laws covering that type of media?

I hope someone sues them and sets them straight about the use of public airwaves.
 
Originally posted by: Strk
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: Strk
I'm not surprised.(he essentially encouraged people to download it, so why wouldn't he want it on network tv?) But the fact remains, it's not going on a network station.
So, since he screwed up and signed a contract restricting the broadcast rights, his opposition should hold back their own film?

Did I say that? Did I say I'm for airing either documentary on network television on the day of the election?(or near it) No, I didn't.

If people want to see either documentary, go for it, but on network television during an election.(let's face it, either documentary can be considered an advertisement)
Wasn't trying to infer that that's what you said, just arguing against it since many people have waged that argument already. I agree 100% - neither should be broadcast publicly. I think the consumer needs to have his say with the almighty dollar weighing in on what's actually a documentary and what's pure propaganda. I don't know anything about the anti-Kerry film, but I'd be willing to bet that it's mostly propaganda, just as F 9/11 is.
 
Originally posted by: wiin
Response from kerry campaign Kerry Campaign: Sinclair 'Better Hope We Don't Win' :

"I think they're going to regret doing this," the Kerry spokesman warned before adding - "They better hope we don't win."

Good for the Kerry. Bush would say the same thing if they pre-empted the public airwaves with F9/11 before the election.

I like this little article about Sinclair and their Faux News stations:

Meet the Sinclair Broadcast Group, the "Clear Channel of local news." Since 1991, the company has managed to acquire 62 television stations or 24 percent of the national TV audience. The company's modus operandi is the centralized production of homogenized, repackaged faux "local" news. Its success offers an alarming glimpse of the post-deregulation world in which all news may be produced in one giant newsroom and from a single viewpoint -- which in Sinclair's case is wholeheartedly conservative.

Story
 
documentarty is ANTI-Kerry
This documentary is not anti kerry. This documentary is about kerry, a historical documentary based on kerry's known public activities and public testimonies. This, the democrats do not want people to know.
 
Because risking your life to defend your country and then questioning about it is unpatriotic.

If Kerry was a true patriot, he would have dodged the draft entirely according to the rich priviledged kid commandments.
 
Back
Top