Originally posted by: ModerateRepZero
I'm not too familar with the current system but I presume that basing titles on length of time encourages lurkers or people who post infrequently to get a title simply by hanging around long enough ("AlanSmithee has been here for 6 years. Despite having only 20 posts he gets a title"). It seems like a poor indication of quality/value.
Granted, post count isn't that much better but at least someone would have to make an effort to post semi-constructive posts as I assume any obvious pattern of neffing will result in penalties.
Originally posted by: BoomerD
I've belonged to a few sites where posts in forums such as OT or P&N don't count toward your post total. ONLY the posts in the actual "information" forums count...
Originally posted by: ktehmok
Originally posted by: ModerateRepZero
I'm not too familar with the current system but I presume that basing titles on length of time encourages lurkers or people who post infrequently to get a title simply by hanging around long enough ("AlanSmithee has been here for 6 years. Despite having only 20 posts he gets a title"). It seems like a poor indication of quality/value.
I'd rather have 20 useful posts in 6 years by "AlanSmithee" than 15,000 by some dimwit neffing 16 year old.
Originally posted by: Old Hippie
Originally posted by: BoomerD
I've belonged to a few sites where posts in forums such as OT or P&N don't count toward your post total. ONLY the posts in the actual "information" forums count...
I've always wondered why that wasn't the case here.
This is a tech site, the rest is just fluff.