BoberFett
Lifer
- Oct 9, 1999
- 37,562
- 9
- 81
I think you will find boberfett's views to be very eh, unique.
Yes, in this country, being correct is pretty unique.
I think you will find boberfett's views to be very eh, unique.
My grandmother died recently leaving behind an electric scooter. My dad tried to sell it, but couldn't find a buyer no matter how low he priced it? Why? Because Medicare picks up the tab on those things. The original price? Around $5,000. How much does it cost to build one those things? $500-1,000? It's an electric motor, a battery, a bit of wiring, a plastic housing and a seat. It just can't cost that much to build. But the government will gladly fork over a massive amount of money for each one. Does anyone really think government run health care would change anything? The system is a money grab from top to bottom and broken beyond repair.
This country will have to fail economically before anything changes.
Here is an idea for Medicare reform which ought to be controversial:
http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2011/05/why-not-let-dead-pay-medicare
In a nutshell, the idea is as follows:
During the time you use Medicare, you receive bills for all services paid for. You do not have to pay them. When you die, Medicare gets reimbursed out of your estate. However, Medicare can only collect up to 100% of your estate, so people who leave nothing behind would not be paying Medicare back.
The author leaves on the table the idea that all Medicare taxes paid during your lifetime would be deducted from the final bill, so you aren't paying into a system then giving back all the benefits you got at the end.
Some problems I can see with this are that people may try to evade it through making inter vivos gifts to their heirs, or in some cases they may just decide to spend their money during their lifetime rather than leave it to the government. There may be some ways to craft the legislation to close some of these options but probably not all of them. Another problem is, suppose the decedent's assets are all tied up in a business, the business might have to be liquidated rather than passed in full to the deceden'ts heirs, thus putting people out of work. This problem could probably be worked around in the legislation.
Thoughts?
- wolf
Screw uncle sam .
That sounds like the worst idea I've ever heard.
Essentially that would take the estate of any family that was not already very wealthy to begin with, as if middle class home ownership is not in a bad enough position already.
Not to mention the inherent insult of paying the system after it fails you.
I'd still like someone to explain what all these medical bills are that these people covered by Medicare supposedly owe.
Medicare is HI, it's supposed to pay the dang medical bills.
Fern
