Should images be allowed in sigs?

Syringer

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
19,333
3
71
They're really annoying imo..

---

The problem is bigger than "annoying" for several reasons:

1. HTML can be a source of malicious code.

2. The extra load of displaying images slows the forums.

3. There is even more slowing action if the source for the pic is slow.

4. It is not fair to other sites to hit them with "the AnandTech Effect" from every hit caused every time a member views a thread containing the image link.

The size of our forums makes our footprint bigger than Bigfoot. Allowing image links would make us bad Internet neighbors.

Anand has been informed of the problem. Until it is resolved, please help us keep our big, clumsy feet out of other sites bandwidth.

Thanks for your cooperation.

AnandTech Moderator
 

jagec

Lifer
Apr 30, 2004
24,442
6
81
No. They suck.

Next thing you know, everyone will have 100x500 animated gifs in their sigs.
 

reverend boltron

Senior member
Nov 18, 2004
945
0
76
Originally posted by: Nik
Yeah, images in sigs are so morally corrupt that even most employers would fire you for looking at them.

I was saying that because what if someone puts a pic in there of a chick who is showing a lot of skin. And I won't give up on you either, I'm still going to pray for your soul.
 

NikPreviousAcct

No Lifer
Aug 15, 2000
52,763
1
0
Originally posted by: reverend boltron
Originally posted by: Nik
Yeah, images in sigs are so morally corrupt that even most employers would fire you for looking at them.

I was saying that because what if someone puts a pic in there of a chick who is showing a lot of skin. And I won't give up on you either, I'm still going to pray for your soul.

You must have a lot of time to waste.