- Aug 25, 2001
- 56,582
- 10,221
- 126
Curious what some people say.
I guess my thinking was, the 95W 1045T Thuban wasn't all that bad as far as power consumption. (And you had better believe that SKL draws a bit more power as you crank up the freq past 4Ghz and above 1.1V. More than Haswell, IMHO.)
I do several things with my PC.
1) Skype (you can do this with a quad-core Atom, although a dual-core Atom may use 80-90% CPU while on a video chat)
2) Web browsing with Waterfox (largely single-threaded, though this may change in the future)
3) Distributed Computing with BOINC (this can use as many threads / cores and GPUs as you can throw at it, power and cooling permitting)
My SKL G4400 @ 4.455Ghz is excellent at #2, due to extremely high single-threaded speed. However, the lack of cores means that it's not so excellent at #3.
My AMD Thuban 1045T @ 3.5Ghz, is not as good at #2, but is excellent at #3, just due to the sheer number of cores, and FPUs. (Hex-core versus dual-core.)
There's just not much of a substitute for MOAR CORES.
If I do decide to run the Thuban, then I'll probably pick up one or two of these boards:
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2459940
Or one from another mfg similar, with the 970 chipset, and a PCI-E M.2 slot. (That board is 2.0 x4, a slight step down from my Z170 Pro4S with PCI-E 3.0 x4. Though I'm not sure how much difference that makes in the real world.)
I guess my thinking was, the 95W 1045T Thuban wasn't all that bad as far as power consumption. (And you had better believe that SKL draws a bit more power as you crank up the freq past 4Ghz and above 1.1V. More than Haswell, IMHO.)
I do several things with my PC.
1) Skype (you can do this with a quad-core Atom, although a dual-core Atom may use 80-90% CPU while on a video chat)
2) Web browsing with Waterfox (largely single-threaded, though this may change in the future)
3) Distributed Computing with BOINC (this can use as many threads / cores and GPUs as you can throw at it, power and cooling permitting)
My SKL G4400 @ 4.455Ghz is excellent at #2, due to extremely high single-threaded speed. However, the lack of cores means that it's not so excellent at #3.
My AMD Thuban 1045T @ 3.5Ghz, is not as good at #2, but is excellent at #3, just due to the sheer number of cores, and FPUs. (Hex-core versus dual-core.)
There's just not much of a substitute for MOAR CORES.
If I do decide to run the Thuban, then I'll probably pick up one or two of these boards:
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2459940
Or one from another mfg similar, with the 970 chipset, and a PCI-E M.2 slot. (That board is 2.0 x4, a slight step down from my Z170 Pro4S with PCI-E 3.0 x4. Though I'm not sure how much difference that makes in the real world.)
Last edited: