Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Let her see the girl - supervised.
Have the law pick her up afterwards.
The girl deserves a chance to see her mother - why punish the child.
Originally posted by: TwinkleToes77
Even though shes no 'real' mother, I think your child deserves to see her. She may be a bitch but shes still her mom and always will be.
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTTTTT!
- M4H
Originally posted by: Ameesh
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTTTTT!
- M4H
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Let her see the girl - supervised.
Have the law pick her up afterwards.
The girl deserves a chance to see her mother - why punish the child.
The supervised visitation option comes up now & again, who should supervise? My ex would not allow me to supervise & there isn't anyone else who wants to baby sit a lunatic.
Courts rarely order supervised visitation because it's nearly impossible to make it work.
She'll run so fast afterwards, The law won't be able to catch up with her. I don't have any reason to keep them waiting & I don't think they'll wait around & drink egg nog till the police arrive, & I don't think even I could pull off something that evil🙁
Plus, if it works the way I want it to, our daughter won't be around to witness anything.
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Let her see the girl - supervised.
Have the law pick her up afterwards.
The girl deserves a chance to see her mother - why punish the child.
The supervised visitation option comes up now & again, who should supervise? My ex would not allow me to supervise & there isn't anyone else who wants to baby sit a lunatic.
Courts rarely order supervised visitation because it's nearly impossible to make it work.
She'll run so fast afterwards, The law won't be able to catch up with her. I don't have any reason to keep them waiting & I don't think they'll wait around & drink egg nog till the police arrive, & I don't think even I could pull off something that evil🙁
Plus, if it works the way I want it to, our daughter won't be around to witness anything.
Address/question your statements point by point:
1) Visitation:
a) Has the court allowed visits? - If yes, you should try to comply to allow her to see the daughter.
b) Are supervised visits called for? - If yes, has the court made any statement on who/how.
Assuming that the lunatic is your ex
2) Are the grandparents your folks.
If so, can they perform the supervision for an hour or so. I think a concern is to ensure that she does not try to take off with the child.
How far away are they.
3) If your ex arrives by auto, the auto should be able to be prevented from leaving by being blocked in.
4) The law seems willing to work with you. Could you perform #3 and call them(let then know) when just before the visitation is over.
My concern is that the child should be allowed to see the mother. But I agree that she does not need to see the results of the law enforcement action.
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Given the latest information, you do not have any real choice.
Protect the kid and nail the ex.
With additional people backing her up, any chance for a coordinated effort to allow the child to see the mother in a controlled environment could turn nasty. Not worth it.
Concern would be if the arrive and the child is not there, would they take off the the grandparents to see her or be willing to wait for her to arrive.
The law will need to be ready to respond to either situation based on the response of the ex.
Is the town small enough that if she leaves before the law arrives, she could be located or do you know her exact schedule so the law could be drinking egg-nog (unmakred car) when she shows up
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Given the latest information, you do not have any real choice.
Protect the kid and nail the ex.
With additional people backing her up, any chance for a coordinated effort to allow the child to see the mother in a controlled environment could turn nasty. Not worth it.
Concern would be if the arrive and the child is not there, would they take off the the grandparents to see her or be willing to wait for her to arrive.
The law will need to be ready to respond to either situation based on the response of the ex.
Is the town small enough that if she leaves before the law arrives, she could be located or do you know her exact schedule so the law could be drinking egg-nog (unmarked car) when she shows up
Last time she was to pick up our child, she was 4 hours late (my current wife, GF @ the time, had to wait @ an airport for her to show, 4 freaking hours late🙁).
They don't know where the grandparents live, so the "Just hang on till they get here, I'll make sure they're on their way" should work, & I'll offer some egg nog while they wait, I suspect they'll decline.
Originally posted by: Azraele
I would say yes save one thing. How will it affect your daughter?
Originally posted by: Karsten
Originally posted by: JEDI
Originally posted by: Karsten
People people people...
All this pseudo discussion if it is heartless to send someone to jail on Christmas... facts are simply this:
- The woman BROKE THE LAW
- The woman HAS OUTSTANDING WARRANTS
- The woman TRIED TO KIDNAP A CHILD (Don't care if she gave birth to it...)
Are we getting so politically correct that we are giving a free get out of jail card to anyone just because it is Christmas?!
I am a Christian. I celebrate that holiday to the best of my ability and try to make it pleasant to my kids and whole family. But if someone in my immediate family had EARNED JAILTIME... (and I don't decide who earns it or not, THE LAW DOES) ... then I'd do my best that JUSTICE is catching up regardless of time of year. It has nothing to do with being heartless, self righteous or mean. As a citizen of this country it is YOUR DUTY to obey the law and help the law BEING ENFORCED.
People that call Moose heartless or unfair or whatever have no idea what they are talking about. Family that is shielding or helping a abusive "parent" are NO BETTER then the abuser.
Do everyone a favor Moose and take the opportunity. Who knows... maybe she gets some counseling in jail of finds Jesus. She needs some serious alone time and think her life over in any case!
how about cliff notes on what she did? what law did she break? what warrents? etc?
The Cliff Notes where posted on page 4 by jester79
Originally posted by: ausm
Originally posted by: Azraele
I would say yes save one thing. How will it affect your daughter?
That is a VERY intelligent question.
The one thing I failed to realize in my divorce. I was more worried about trying to screw over my ex then about my kids needs. I luckily saw the light before it was to late.
Ausm
Originally posted by: Karsten
People people people...
All this pseudo discussion if it is heartless to send someone to jail on Christmas... facts are simply this:
- The woman BROKE THE LAW
- The woman HAS OUTSTANDING WARRANTS
- The woman TRIED TO KIDNAP A CHILD (Don't care if she gave birth to it...)
Are we getting so politically correct that we are giving a free get out of jail card to anyone just because it is Christmas?!
I am a Christian. I celebrate that holiday to the best of my ability and try to make it pleasant to my kids and whole family. But if someone in my immediate family had EARNED JAILTIME... (and I don't decide who earns it or not, THE LAW DOES) ... then I'd do my best that JUSTICE is catching up regardless of time of year. It has nothing to do with being heartless, self righteous or mean. As a citizen of this country it is YOUR DUTY to obey the law and help the law BEING ENFORCED.
People that call Moose heartless or unfair or whatever have no idea what they are talking about. Family that is shielding or helping a abusive "parent" are NO BETTER then the abuser.
Do everyone a favor Moose and take the opportunity. Who knows... maybe she gets some counseling in jail of finds Jesus. She needs some serious alone time and think her life over in any case!
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: Karsten
People people people...
All this pseudo discussion if it is heartless to send someone to jail on Christmas... facts are simply this:
- The woman BROKE THE LAW
- The woman HAS OUTSTANDING WARRANTS
- The woman TRIED TO KIDNAP A CHILD (Don't care if she gave birth to it...)
Are we getting so politically correct that we are giving a free get out of jail card to anyone just because it is Christmas?!
I am a Christian. I celebrate that holiday to the best of my ability and try to make it pleasant to my kids and whole family. But if someone in my immediate family had EARNED JAILTIME... (and I don't decide who earns it or not, THE LAW DOES) ... then I'd do my best that JUSTICE is catching up regardless of time of year. It has nothing to do with being heartless, self righteous or mean. As a citizen of this country it is YOUR DUTY to obey the law and help the law BEING ENFORCED.
People that call Moose heartless or unfair or whatever have no idea what they are talking about. Family that is shielding or helping a abusive "parent" are NO BETTER then the abuser.
Do everyone a favor Moose and take the opportunity. Who knows... maybe she gets some counseling in jail of finds Jesus. She needs some serious alone time and think her life over in any case!
So we are all to assume you have never ever ever broken or bent any laws? Speeding, downloading software/music, etc.
Are you the Second Coming for Rapture? If so pick me, pick me!
![]()
Å
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
She might have "earned it" but your child sure didn't.
I honestly don't think it's a good idea to have the child in contact with her @ this point. She's broken every rule in the book on parenting, abandoned our daughter's 1/2 sister in the UK (she's 19) and abandoned our daughter's 1/2 brother in the US 6 years ago...
:|
Originally posted by: ergeorge
Uhmm ... you're comparing speeding and copyright violations to repeated attempts to kidnap a child and remove her from the country?
Somebody needs a dose of perspective![]()