Should I do bicep work?

MegaVovaN

Diamond Member
May 20, 2005
4,131
0
0
Hi all!
I've been doing compound lifts for about a month+ now. I see the results. However, EVERYONE I know judges "buffiness" by pointing at bicep, or flexing the bicep.

I am annoyed a little by this, so I was thinking I would do some bicep work after all the heavy lifts? With big hormonal response from squat (doing squats every workout) I think they (bicep curls) will actually deliver results?
 

presidentender

Golden Member
Jan 23, 2008
1,166
0
76
Bicep concentration lifts, especially preacher curls, had been my favorite since high school. I broke my hand a while back and stopped doing them. When I came back, I decided to do only compound lifts for a while. While my bi's still aren't up to par, my back has grown faster than ever before: I can row more and do more pull-ups because my biceps aren't tired from the day before. Something to think about.
 

KingGheedora

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2006
3,248
1
81
But do bicep exercises work to make bi's bigger? My biceps are smaller in proportion compared to the rest of my body. I wanted to start doing bicep exercises to even everything out but people always say to avoid that so i was wondering if this wouldn't work or not.
 

crt1530

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2001
3,194
0
0
It won't hurt anything, but you'd be better off working on your chin-ups.
 
Mar 22, 2002
10,483
32
81
Originally posted by: crt1530
It won't hurt anything, but you'd be better off working on your chin-ups.

I agree with this due to the other muscles being involved, but I must say that my biceps look great after doing the MAX-OT bodybuilding program. It involved curl bar curls, straight bar curls, hammer curls, incline curls in its different routines. I would say you could do 2-3 sets of 2 of these exercises with heavy weight and you could get some better results. I think I started the program with something like 13" arms, and have 14" arms now unflexed.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,472
6,315
126
imo just add straight barbell curls. those are the best thing you can do for your biceps. screw all these "concentrated" bicep exercises.

toss 10lbs on each side of the 45lb straight bar (or however much weight you wanna add to each side) and rep that out. my arms didn't really grow tremendously until i started doing those. now i won't go a bicep workout w/out starting with those.
 
Mar 22, 2002
10,483
32
81
Originally posted by: purbeast0
imo just add straight barbell curls. those are the best thing you can do for your biceps. screw all these "concentrated" bicep exercises.

toss 10lbs on each side of the 45lb straight bar (or however much weight you wanna add to each side) and rep that out. my arms didn't really grow tremendously until i started doing those. now i won't go a bicep workout w/out starting with those.

Yeah, the problem I had with straight bar curls though is the strain on the wrists. For that reason, I mainly did curl bar curls and hammer curls. They worked out great.

I agree that you shouldn't do concentration curls though. I like doing the curl bar curls while standing up 'cause you can sort of kip if you need to. It allows you to get more weight up, allowing your muscles to grow a bit more.
 

skace

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
14,488
7
81
I'm a little torn on how I should respond to this... Why do you care what everyone thinks constitutes "buffness"? Worrying about something like that is a good way to get sidetracked and lose focus. Why are you even worried about looks 1 month in? You've got a long, long way to go.

Most importantly, large arms may be a focal point for a lot of lifters, but that is not JUST biceps. Large biceps with small triceps looks retarded. Many different exercises are required to create the kind of large arms that actually look good.

Should you do bicep curls on a day dedicated to your upper body? Sure why not, just don't neglect the other upper body muscles.
 

KoolDrew

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
10,226
7
81
If you've just started lifting a month ago, don't bother. You'll see plenty of arm growth from heavy pushing/pulling anyway. What does your routine look like?
 

scootermaster

Platinum Member
Nov 29, 2005
2,411
0
0
Originally posted by: skace
I'm a little torn on how I should respond to this... Why do you care what everyone thinks constitutes "buffness"? Worrying about something like that is a good way to get sidetracked and lose focus. Why are you even worried about looks 1 month in? You've got a long, long way to go.

Most importantly, large arms may be a focal point for a lot of lifters, but that is not JUST biceps. Large biceps with small triceps looks retarded. Many different exercises are required to create the kind of large arms that actually look good.

Should you do bicep curls on a day dedicated to your upper body? Sure why not, just don't neglect the other upper body muscles.

First off, the triceps comment is dead on. Everyone knows the "arms" are a majority triceps and delts, and if you want "big" ones you need to work those, perhaps even more so than biceps.

But in reality, I'm really shocked at all of these responses...arguing over what type of curls to do.

Half of the Starting Strength post is the author making fun of "Curl Jockeys" and people who want "teh big gunnz". I mean, read the darn post! How many times does the author say something like this:

Q: "But I wanna add some..."
A: "Shut the fuck up and do the routine"

Q: "But maybe if I just did some extra..."
A: "Shut the fuck up and do the routine"

Q: "I know! But my friend has HUGE arms and he occasionally does..."
A: "Shut the fuck up and do the routine"

Et mother-effin' cetera.

So you want big guns, sure, do your curls. See if that works out for you. I know that if you're a month into working out, you've probably got more important things to do with your time. But if it makes you feel better, go right ahead.

For what it's worth, girls tell me I have great arms all the time. And I did/do curls (and a lot of iso tricep exercises). It also took me about 2 and a half years to get past curling anything above 30 pound dumbells. My guess is my time would have been better spent doing something else.
 

TecHNooB

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
7,458
1
76
I do bicep work but that's just me. Many excercises will inadvertantly use the bicep so you don't have to do curls specifically to hit them.
 

scootermaster

Platinum Member
Nov 29, 2005
2,411
0
0
Originally posted by: TecHNooB
I do bicep work but that's just me. Many excercises will inadvertantly use the bicep so you don't have to do curls specifically to hit them.

See? This is what I'm talking about.

There are sections in Starting Strength that specifically deal with this, and why it's unnecessary. But people seem to do it anyway.

So let's substitute squats for "leg extensions".

So the OP really wants buff quads. Chicks dig buff quads. Should he add some leg extension work to help get ripped? What would you guys all say then?

So why would it be any different with the curls?



 

TecHNooB

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
7,458
1
76
And FYI, you're kind of a newbie so I understand your bicep 'needs'. However, in a few months, you'll be yearning for a ripped chest, wide back, and huge shoulders. Much more impressive than biceps ;)
 

MegaVovaN

Diamond Member
May 20, 2005
4,131
0
0
I know biceps/triceps are hit indirectly. And I do see growth in them. Thing is, my arms between shoulder and elbow look small in comparison to shoulders and traps and lats.

I've read Starting Strength cover to cover couple times. And I know it does a lot of hating on kids doing only curls. However, it says in Programming chapter (I think), and I quote: "Any assistance exercises should be done after main ones."

re: 30 lb DBs - if I hit a plateau like that (2 years? damn!) I might just stop doing them.

My routine for first few weeks was DB based with core DB exercises (DB squats, DB DLs, DB rows, DB OH press and DB bench press, etc) and bodyweight exercises (pull/chin ups, push ups, crunches, leg raises).
You can see the log here:
http://forums.anandtech.com/me...=2162165&enterthread=y

Then I joined a gym, about 2 weeks ago. Now my routine is like this:

Day A:
Squats
Bench Press
DL

Day B:
Squats
Press (overhead with barbell)
Power Cleans (still have to learn that movement)

With any "extra" exercises after 3 BIG ones are done, if I have any more strength left (last 2 workouts I didn't have any str left).
"extras" I considered doing are:
-inclined sit ups
-pull up/chins
-push ups
-bicep/tricep work

And week is MWF = ABA and BAB
up to 4 times a week cardio on TuThSatSun


So I might not be doing much extra work simply because a) I am drained by the time I finish 3 big lifts and b) I already spent 60-70 minutes in gym doing warm up + big 3.
 

gramboh

Platinum Member
May 3, 2003
2,207
0
0
I'm a novice as well, I don't bother doing any iso (I used to do a lot, like 3 diff curl exercises and 2 or 3 diff tri exercises on "arms" day) and my arms look the same now (Stronglifts 5x5) as they did when I used to do that iso work. Actually I think they look a bit more toned, probably from dips and chin-ups. The only thing I'd be worried about in adding curls to your Rippetoe program is making sure they don't take away from the main workout by:

A) You 'save' some energy from the big lifts (even subconciously) since you know you have more exercises left, say you are doing the one set of deads on day A, will you pull as hard if you know you have more work to do?

B) You increase recovery time from the iso stuff and can't add weight the next day to various exercises.

My plan is to stick strictly with Stronglifts 5x5 until I can squat 1.5x BW and bench BW, then maybe add some iso stuff and other fun things (e.g. turkish get-ups). If it's working overall, why mess with it?
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Yeah, the problem I had with straight bar curls though is the strain on the wrists.
A lot of people have this problem and I'm one of them. IMO, they are an anatomically bad movement. EZ-bar is better and I can tolerate as much as my muscles can hold if I do dumbell curls, which are probably even better since both sides have to work similarly.

I would do curls of some kind. I do a lot of pullups but nothing gets my biceps hit like curls. Some people spend too much time at t-mag and think we should all be doing nothing but deadlifts, dips, and squats with kettle bells and anything else is ghey and poseur.
 

brikis98

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2005
7,253
8
0
Originally posted by: scootermaster
Originally posted by: skace
I'm a little torn on how I should respond to this... Why do you care what everyone thinks constitutes "buffness"? Worrying about something like that is a good way to get sidetracked and lose focus. Why are you even worried about looks 1 month in? You've got a long, long way to go.

Most importantly, large arms may be a focal point for a lot of lifters, but that is not JUST biceps. Large biceps with small triceps looks retarded. Many different exercises are required to create the kind of large arms that actually look good.

Should you do bicep curls on a day dedicated to your upper body? Sure why not, just don't neglect the other upper body muscles.

First off, the triceps comment is dead on. Everyone knows the "arms" are a majority triceps and delts, and if you want "big" ones you need to work those, perhaps even more so than biceps.

But in reality, I'm really shocked at all of these responses...arguing over what type of curls to do.

Half of the Starting Strength post is the author making fun of "Curl Jockeys" and people who want "teh big gunnz". I mean, read the darn post! How many times does the author say something like this:

Q: "But I wanna add some..."
A: "Shut the fuck up and do the routine"

Q: "But maybe if I just did some extra..."
A: "Shut the fuck up and do the routine"

Q: "I know! But my friend has HUGE arms and he occasionally does..."
A: "Shut the fuck up and do the routine"

Et mother-effin' cetera.

So you want big guns, sure, do your curls. See if that works out for you. I know that if you're a month into working out, you've probably got more important things to do with your time. But if it makes you feel better, go right ahead.

For what it's worth, girls tell me I have great arms all the time. And I did/do curls (and a lot of iso tricep exercises). It also took me about 2 and a half years to get past curling anything above 30 pound dumbells. My guess is my time would have been better spent doing something else.

let me say outright that I'm 100% in favor of basing the entire workout around compound lifts - squat, deadlift, bench, military press, rows, etc. Virtually all of your time weight lifting should be focused on these lifts and ONLY these lifts. they are by far the most effective way to produce strength and size gains and you'll do damn well even if you drop everything else. moreover, as a general rule, beginners *especially* don't need to add any isolation exercises to their workout. if you are doing the workouts properly and with heavy weight, the compound exercise alone will provide more than enough work for your biceps/triceps/etc. you just don't have enough of a muscle base to benefit from isolation work and are likely to instead burn yourself out, hindering progress instead of helping it.

having said all that, you don't need to be fanatical about compound lifts to the extent that you exclude everything else from your workout. if done properly, you *CAN* achieve better results with some isolation exercises than without. there are a few scenarios where i could see isolation exercises being very beneficial:

1. You are an intermediate lifter (at *least* 2 years of proper lifting under your belt), you have built a very solid base of muscle from compound lifts and are now finding that those lifts are not hitting particular muscles enough. For example, after a while, you won't see much improvement in bicep strength/size from doing rows or pullups. In this case, at the very end of a workout, once a week, you can see great benefit from adding 2-3 sets of biceps exercises. Another example is bench press: after a few years, most of the stress of the exercise will be on your shoulders and chest and your triceps won't be improving much. Adding some skull crushers can really help out. you'll notice that the intermediate and advanced programs (bill star 5x5, madcow version) all advise adding "assistance" to the end of the workout

2. You've been lifting for at least 6 months and begin to stall in some of your lifts. Sometimes, this just means you need to reset or tweak your programming, but I would argue that sometimes, a lift can be limited by a particular muscle. For example, weak triceps can seriously reduce the weight you can handle on bench and therefore reduce the effectiveness of the exercise on your chest & shoulder. you can just keep benching from week to week to slowly build the triceps up and you will eventually break through your plateau. However, some isolated tricep work (e.g. skull crushers) can be an excellent way to seriously speed this along. Again, once a week, at the end of the workout (AFTER you've done all your compound lifts), toss in 2-3 sets of isolation exercises.

in summary, stick with compound lifts, lift heavy, and as a beginner, you should be fine. in a few circumstances, 2-3 isolation sets at the very end of the workout can be helpful.


EDIT -->

forgot to mention a couple of things:

1. if it took you 2 years to get to 30lb dumbbell curls... you were doing something very very wrong. i'd estimate the average male (~185lbs, moderately athletic) should be doing 30lb db curls in under a year. i was doing them in high school after just 6 months of working out and back then, i was dumb and did NO compound lifts whatsoever, so my progress was slow.

2. my favorite isolation exercises are:

* one armed preacher curls with dumbbells. do it with the FULL range of motion (don't stop short) and you'll see some quick results. Doing them preacher curl style completely prevents you from swinging the dumbbell, lifting your shoulder, bending your back, etc. As long as you go all the way down, you either do it right, or not at all.

* barbell curls. you can lift heavy with a barbell and as an added bonus, it shreds your forearms nicely too. get a spotter to make sure you DON'T swing or use your back at all.

* skull crushers. do them slowly.

* dips. more of a compound exercise, actually, bit it targets the triceps pretty well.

* crunches on an exercise ball. do crunches, not situps. hold small plates on your forehead for increased difficulty. do them to the sides to get the obliques.

* calf press on the leg press machine. lets you do a massive amount of weight and get a great range of motion.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,472
6,315
126
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Yeah, the problem I had with straight bar curls though is the strain on the wrists.
A lot of people have this problem and I'm one of them. IMO, they are an anatomically bad movement. EZ-bar is better and I can tolerate as much as my muscles can hold if I do dumbell curls, which are probably even better since both sides have to work similarly.

I would do curls of some kind. I do a lot of pullups but nothing gets my biceps hit like curls. Some people spend too much time at t-mag and think we should all be doing nothing but deadlifts, dips, and squats with kettle bells and anything else is ghey and poseur.

the problem w/the ez curl bar is that ...

1. it's A LOT easier to cheat and pop your elbows pointing out.
2. it doesn't build up your forearms as much

if you are getting hurt wrists when doing straight bar curls, then your hands are too close together.

for instance, right now, make 2 fists palms facing up and put your hands next to eachother. look at how your wrists are bent. now move your hands apart so they are about shoulder width apart. notice that your wrists will not be bent at all.

i used to do ez bar curls but ever since I started doing straight bar curls I don't do them at all. my arms have grown tremendously since I started the straight bar curls.

i also have this "close wrist" problem when doing close grip bench for my triceps. when doing close grip bench I don't hold my wrists very close at all, however i still get the same workout on my triceps as if I am.

EDIT:

oh and I agree, big arms aren't all about your biceps. its all about the meeting point of your shoulders, triceps, and biceps.
 

skace

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
14,488
7
81
On second thought, I don't think I should be recommending complex exercises to someone who just started out.
 
Mar 22, 2002
10,483
32
81
Originally posted by: scootermaster
Originally posted by: TecHNooB
I do bicep work but that's just me. Many excercises will inadvertantly use the bicep so you don't have to do curls specifically to hit them.

See? This is what I'm talking about.

There are sections in Starting Strength that specifically deal with this, and why it's unnecessary. But people seem to do it anyway.

So let's substitute squats for "leg extensions".

So the OP really wants buff quads. Chicks dig buff quads. Should he add some leg extension work to help get ripped? What would you guys all say then?

So why would it be any different with the curls?

I say if you're putting in the majority of the work to get in shape, you might as well look the way you want to look. Curls aren't going to hurt your performance and, if they make him feel better about himself, there is only a positive gain in this aspect. Don't be so anal about non-functionality. To some, if they're gonna put a ton of time and effort into getting into shape, they're gonna wanna look good. I say, go for it. It's not hurting anyone.

Well, get this - he's not substituting anything for anything else. The hypothetical situation has already failed to meet the requirements of a proper analogy. If he wanted buff legs and did his leg extensions at the end of his normal leg workout, which included squats, is that hurting anything? No. Is it allowing him to possibly boost his self esteem? Yes. Confidence is a big part in a guy's life. Let him look how he wants to look. Again, it's not hurting anyone.
 

skace

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
14,488
7
81
Originally posted by: SociallyChallenged
Don't be so anal about non-functionality. To some, if they're gonna put a ton of time and effort into getting into shape, they're gonna wanna look good. I say, go for it. It's not hurting anyone.

The problem with that is that the idea he has in his mind that he wants to look like is probably not what he is going to look like by dedicating tons of time to bicep workouts. There is nothing wrong with people looking the way they want to look, as long as they know the proper way of getting there. Like I said in my earlier post, a lot of people starting out have an idea of what they want for arms and usually think biceps are the way to get there, but they massively underestimate how much of the arm is dominated by the tricep and what they end up with is these pancake biceps and nothing else to their arm.
 

presidentender

Golden Member
Jan 23, 2008
1,166
0
76
Originally posted by: skace
Originally posted by: SociallyChallenged
Don't be so anal about non-functionality. To some, if they're gonna put a ton of time and effort into getting into shape, they're gonna wanna look good. I say, go for it. It's not hurting anyone.

The problem with that is that the idea he has in his mind that he wants to look like is probably not what he is going to look like by dedicating tons of time to bicep workouts. There is nothing wrong with people looking the way they want to look, as long as they know the proper way of getting there. Like I said in my earlier post, a lot of people starting out have an idea of what they want for arms and usually think biceps are the way to get there, but they massively underestimate how much of the arm is dominated by the tricep and what they end up with is these pancake biceps and nothing else to their arm.

Given that he's asking about starting bicep work, I think it likely that he's also been working his triceps.
 

jiggahertz

Golden Member
Apr 7, 2005
1,532
0
76
Originally posted by: SociallyChallenged
Originally posted by: scootermaster
Originally posted by: TecHNooB
I do bicep work but that's just me. Many excercises will inadvertantly use the bicep so you don't have to do curls specifically to hit them.

See? This is what I'm talking about.

There are sections in Starting Strength that specifically deal with this, and why it's unnecessary. But people seem to do it anyway.

So let's substitute squats for "leg extensions".

So the OP really wants buff quads. Chicks dig buff quads. Should he add some leg extension work to help get ripped? What would you guys all say then?

So why would it be any different with the curls?

I say if you're putting in the majority of the work to get in shape, you might as well look the way you want to look. Curls aren't going to hurt your performance and, if they make him feel better about himself, there is only a positive gain in this aspect. Don't be so anal about non-functionality. To some, if they're gonna put a ton of time and effort into getting into shape, they're gonna wanna look good. I say, go for it. It's not hurting anyone.

Well, get this - he's not substituting anything for anything else. The hypothetical situation has already failed to meet the requirements of a proper analogy. If he wanted buff legs and did his leg extensions at the end of his normal leg workout, which included squats, is that hurting anything? No. Is it allowing him to possibly boost his self esteem? Yes. Confidence is a big part in a guy's life. Let him look how he wants to look. Again, it's not hurting anyone.

It's also a poor analogy because quads are the primary muscle group of a squat, while biceps are synergists in most back exercises. Some people respond well to direct work on smaller muscle groups, and some don't. As long as you're not overtraining there isn't anything wrong with direct bicep work.
 
Mar 22, 2002
10,483
32
81
Originally posted by: MegaVovaN
Originally posted by: presidentender
Given that he's asking about starting bicep work, I think it likely that he's also been working his triceps.
Good guess, but no. I didn't do any specific tricep work lately, check my log:
MegaVovaN's Fitness Journal

Right, but even just in bench press, they're getting a great workout. The problem with doing exercises explicitly for biceps is that it may lead to isolation of other muscles (i.e. triceps to balance). At that point, you're just starting to get into bodybuilding. Maybe chinups are the thing that are best worth your time though. Perhaps patience is just the key right now, especially since you're new to all this.