Originally posted by: AndyTriboletti
what religion says that you have to keep your organs intact? that's (imo) absurd.
None that I am aware of.
The question of whether or not one should be a donor is usually not a religious one. The actual issue is the sad and real fact that organ donations and transplantations are big business and, like Nik said, doctors do NOT do everything possible to save the lives of potential donors, except insofar as what effort they must do in order to keep the organs acceptable for donation. There have been many unbiased and true articles about this, feel free to look them up yourselves.
The reality is that dead people, in the common sense of the word, do not provide organs that are acceptable for donation. Once the heart stops beating and the blood stops flowing, the organs are worthless to the doctors. Therefore, the "harvest" (actual word used by organ donor doctors) must begin before death, before the heart has stopped beating. And despite common myth, there is no "consultation with family" or anything like that. The process is far too fast. Once a potential donor candidate (young serious accident victim) enters the emergency room/trauma ward, a determination is made if the life can be saved or not. If the determination is "probably not," then medications are began to induce (or hasten) brain death while keeping the heart beating. Once brain death occurs, the harvest begins, with the heart still beating.
In fact, 2-3 years ago the DA of Cleveland, OH threatened to indict the directors of the local organ donor department for murder because of some of the lethal drug combinations that they were giving to donor candidates in order to speed up brain death (and thus increase their successful harvest ratio).
There are many, many books and articles on this subject, I suggest some folks read up. It is far from a religious issue.
edited for spelling