Should he be executed?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ribbon13

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2005
9,343
0
0
Let's put it this way, what you'd get in your system from it being on your hands if you weren't wearing gloves while handling it, can kill you.
 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
Originally posted by: ribbon13
Let's put it this way, what you'd get in your system from it being on your hands if you weren't wearing gloves while handling it, can kill you.

Sooo...What your saying is 4 grams should last me for a while then right? Ok, in that case I'll make it 50 bucks.
 

yourdeardaniel

Golden Member
Mar 20, 2004
1,905
0
0
Singapore is retarded. Good thing I don't live there.
He didn't murder anyone so why should he be put to death.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Singapore is an extremely Authoritarian Country. I can understand why some Texans like Ronstang would support it.
 

kravmaga

Senior member
Aug 10, 2005
264
0
0
Are the people that are for his execution christian (or consider themselves such) or do they believe that death is not final? He was just moving narcotics. Should drug users also be sentenced to death? Without them there would be no drug trafficing.
 

Kelemvor

Lifer
May 23, 2002
16,928
8
81
Sure, why not. Execute anyone that uses, sells, traffics, etc drugs. Also anyone that rapes, murders, robs, etc. Just get rid of them all and what's left will be a happy wonderful place.
 

Lifted

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2004
5,748
2
0
Originally posted by: FrankyJunior
Sure, why not. Execute anyone that uses, sells, traffics, etc drugs. Also anyone that rapes, murders, robs, etc. Just get rid of them all and what's left will be a happy wonderful place.

Sure, no advil will make everyone MUCH happier. :roll:
 

trinketsummoner

Senior member
Aug 24, 2004
695
1
81
I love Singapore. I went there on vacation with my wife a few years ago and it was an amazing experience. Ive never felt safer in a country, the people were friendly and very polite, even in immigration they smiled! Believe me, thats unusual :)

I do agree though, you do the crime, you do the time. You have to be a complete moron to not know the drug penalties in the far east. Its not like he just had some for personal use. It was interesting when we came back from Singapore, when we got off the plane in London the drug dogs were right there sniffing everyone as the exited. Its obviously a big problem and hopefully the death penalty sends the right message.

If the guy needed to get money for debts, why not work in McDs? :confused:
 

imported_hscorpio

Golden Member
Sep 1, 2004
1,617
0
0
There are two things wrong with killing a man for drug trafficking. First the punishment far exceeds the crime. Here in the US we have this little thing called the constitution, that specifically restricts cruel or unusual punishment. The US supreme court has ruled that the death penalty is unconstitutionally excessive for any crime other than murder. For those of you who think trafficking drugs is worthy of the death penalty, I say your nuts. It's equivalent to suggesting a bartender or liquor store owner should be held criminaly responsible when some idiot drinks himself to death or plows through a pedestrian in his car. In a just and free society the punishment should fit the crime, plain and simple.

Second, this punishment would do little to deter future drug trafficking. These traffickers are not drug kingpins, they are bottom of the barrel mules. There are plenty of poor, stupid and desperate people who will risk their lives for a chance to get rich quick. The fact is that over 3 decades of fighting a war on drugs here in the US has shown that harsher punishments do not deter drug use or sale in a free society. Where has increasing prison sentences, manditory minimums, asset forfeiture, etc. gotten us? The drugs are more available, more pure, and cheaper than ever in the US.

Now obviously singapore is not the US. Don't make the mistake of believing their excessive punishments that appear to work there will somehow work here. Singapore is a authoritarian police state/city. Nearly everything is against the law there, and the law is strictly enforced. They have sacrificed individuality and freedom for security in their small urban island. Sure they are effective at controlling crime and drug use, but there is a price.

We could try and replicate their low drug use and crime but it would require a massive increase in government police powers. We would have to throw out much of the constitution while setting up our new police state, which we are nicely on our way thanks to the WOD. I personally don't think its worth it.
 

Accipiter22

Banned
Feb 11, 2005
7,942
2
0
Originally posted by: JohnPaul
This is insane!! Killing a guy for smuggling heroin? The punishment does not fit the crime. So he is stupid and should do some time, but not be killed. In my opinion you should only be killed if it has been proven that you purposefully took another life. BTW effee, this board is in no way a sampling of what the world as a whole thinks of your countries actions as far as laws go. From what I have read, people are outraged, but they have no idea what to do, as they no nothing they say will help. Case in point would be that kid 10 years ago who tagged some buildings in Singapore who was caned. Nothing could be done about that, and most likely nothing can be done about this. Singapore may be nice and clean, but who cares if people are afraid if they spit on the sidewalk they will be caned, or worse. I cannot see Singapore being a very big travel hotspot, or am I wrong on this?

I was in full support of that douche bag getting caned...what a little twerp. As for this situation, I dunno....i remember the story about the girl....not this story though

 

Accipiter22

Banned
Feb 11, 2005
7,942
2
0
Originally posted by: ribbon13
Originally posted by: ironcrotch
Send him to an island designated for criminals only.

Oh my god, that's a fantastic sense of wit! :laugh: I bet there are many who didn't get it.

lol I didn't get it till you pointed it out hahaha
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
Originally posted by: effee
So if the majority of you guys see it the same way I do, why can't the Australians see it that way too? Or have they always been a carebear country

australia is a country of thieves. well, not literally, but it was a prison colony and people brag about their ancestors being prisoners.
 

Accipiter22

Banned
Feb 11, 2005
7,942
2
0
Originally posted by: ribbon13
Let's put it this way, what you'd get in your system from it being on your hands if you weren't wearing gloves while handling it, can kill you.

yeah yeah you told me that last time you sold me that stuff....pfft...I turned blue and had frothy convulstions....I DEFINETLY didn't die though.
 

Accipiter22

Banned
Feb 11, 2005
7,942
2
0
Originally posted by: hscorpio
There are two things wrong with killing a man for drug trafficking. First the punishment far exceeds the crime. Here in the US we have this little thing called the constitution, that specifically restricts cruel or unusual punishment. The US supreme court has ruled that the death penalty is unconstitutionally excessive for any crime other than murder. For those of you who think trafficking drugs is worthy of the death penalty, I say your nuts. It's equivalent to suggesting a bartender or liquor store owner should be held criminaly responsible when some idiot drinks himself to death or plows through a pedestrian in his car. In a just and free society the punishment should fit the crime, plain and simple.

Second, this punishment would do little to deter future drug trafficking. These traffickers are not drug kingpins, they are bottom of the barrel mules. There are plenty of poor, stupid and desperate people who will risk their lives for a chance to get rich quick. The fact is that over 3 decades of fighting a war on drugs here in the US has shown that harsher punishments do not deter drug use or sale in a free society. Where has increasing prison sentences, manditory minimums, asset forfeiture, etc. gotten us? The drugs are more available, more pure, and cheaper than ever in the US.

Now obviously singapore is not the US. Don't make the mistake of believing their excessive punishments that appear to work there will somehow work here. Singapore is a authoritarian police state/city. Nearly everything is against the law there, and the law is strictly enforced. They have sacrificed individuality and freedom for security in their small urban island. Sure they are effective at controlling crime and drug use, but there is a price.

We could try and replicate their low drug use and crime but it would require a massive increase in government police powers. We would have to throw out much of the constitution while setting up our new police state, which we are nicely on our way thanks to the WOD. I personally don't think its worth it.

word. Because the death penalty over here has DEFINETLY deterred others from murdering people...right guys.................guys?

 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
Originally posted by: hscorpio
There are two things wrong with killing a man for drug trafficking. First the punishment far exceeds the crime. Here in the US we have this little thing called the constitution, that specifically restricts cruel or unusual punishment. The US supreme court has ruled that the death penalty is unconstitutionally excessive for any crime other than murder. For those of you who think trafficking drugs is worthy of the death penalty, I say your nuts. It's equivalent to suggesting a bartender or liquor store owner should be held criminaly responsible when some idiot drinks himself to death or plows through a pedestrian in his car. In a just and free society the punishment should fit the crime, plain and simple.

the use of the death penalty is something reasonable people could disagree upon. what real authority does a tribunal of 9 unelected countermajoritarian oligarchs have over the rest of the citizenry to require total deference to them in such matters?

and if deterrence is what you want, then the punishment fitting the crime is really only getting you back to the status quo. so, no one is deterred. you would steal if all you had to do when caught was giving the money back. so obviously the punishment must outweight the crime, and probably by quite a big because a lot of crime isn't caught.
 

Ricochet

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 1999
6,390
19
81
Well said, hscorpio. We have a lot of people on this board who are so quick to judge and prosecute. Taking ones life over moving substances is far too extreme.
 

Ausm

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
25,213
14
81
I think they should let him go swimming off the great barrier reef so he can be a snack for a great white shark :)

Ausm
 

dug777

Lifer
Oct 13, 2004
24,778
4
0
he knew the law in singapore, he was stupid enuff to drug traffic there, i've no sympathy for him, sure it seems harsh, but singapore makes no secret of their drug laws...

Save your sympathy for those who actually deserve it.
 

imported_hscorpio

Golden Member
Sep 1, 2004
1,617
0
0
Originally posted by: dug777
he knew the law in singapore, he was stupid enuff to drug traffic there, i've no sympathy for him, sure it seems harsh, but singapore makes no secret of their drug laws...

Save your sympathy for those who actually deserve it.


So where do you draw the line? Why not use the death penalty as a punishment for all crimes?
 

mrrman

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2004
8,497
3
0
he got caught with drugs with the intent to sell so hell yes...this law should be in place in N America to...I dont want no scumbag selling drugs to my kids