• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Shots fired at GOP Congressional baseball practice

Page 17 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Except that earlier in this thread, multiple congressman were quoted stating that they should be allowed to carry. Being that this was a practice session for them, they would have been playing which brings me back to original point, how do you play baseball and carry at the same time.
meh, bucky is good for a laugh, correction, good for something to point and laugh at. You will never get a coherent response to that pointed question, just another round of buckshattery
 
It's funny how a certain attitude to honesty, bat shit insane theories, a casual relationship with reality and an over reliance on YouTube and lack of ability to express themselves define a certain type of poster.

It's amazing. They absolutely simply cannot present their own arguments in their own words.

It's just hilarious how easy it is to walk them up onto that hill before they realize that it's no better for them than Little Big Horn was for Custer.
 
Last edited:
Except that earlier in this thread, multiple congressman were quoted stating that they should be allowed to carry. Being that this was a practice session for them, they would have been playing which brings me back to original point, how do you play baseball and carry at the same time.
They should but that doesn't necessarily mean it would have helped in this specific situation. Them playing baseball takes up a tiny tiny minority of their time.
 
It's amazing. They absolutely simply cannot present their own arguments in their own words.
What arguments? I want you to listen to this man's arguments in HIS own words but you want me to put them in my words. Listen or don't. I don't care. I don't agree with any arguments for the conspiracies either.
 
It's funny how a certain attitude to honesty, bat shit insane theories, a casual relationship with reality and an over reliance on YouTube and lack of ability to express themselves define a certain type of poster.
The topic was his view of Sandy Hook so I posted a link exactly about that. Watch it or don't. I don't agree with Alex on this.
 
The topic was his view of Sandy Hook so I posted a link exactly about that. Watch it or don't. I don't agree with Alex on this.

wow, aren't you such a complex thinker. How about this: lunatic claims that Sandy Hook was fake, false flag, sells you brain serum, etc etc...."Oh, he's crazy on that thing, but he's totally reasonable in other areas."

OK, sure buckshat. You are an absolute poor judge of character and information. Lunatic says lunatic thing....safe bet he really is a lunatic contributing nothing of value to anyone.
 
wow, aren't you such a complex thinker. How about this: lunatic claims that Sandy Hook was fake, false flag, sells you brain serum, etc etc...."Oh, he's crazy on that thing, but he's totally reasonable in other areas."

OK, sure buckshat. You are an absolute poor judge of character and information. Lunatic says lunatic thing....safe bet he really is a lunatic contributing nothing of value to anyone.
That isn't his position, which is why I posted the video. I'm not endorsing anything else he has said by saying I disagree with him on Sandy Hook. You're having a terrible day.
 
That isn't his position, which is why I posted the video. I'm not endorsing anything else he has said by saying I disagree with him on Sandy Hook. You're having a terrible day.

yes, you did return after all. kind of a shitty day. I'm not sure what the word for it is, but it isn't exactly entertaining, and it isn't exactly a disaster. It's something else. I think this needs a new word...
 
yes, you did return after all. kind of a shitty day. I'm not sure what the word for it is, but it isn't exactly entertaining, and it isn't exactly a disaster. It's something else. I think this needs a new word...
You lie about what I say, you fail 5th grade civics class by confusing yourself on what impeachment is then quadruple down when I show you the relevant text from the constitution. You're embarrassing yourself.
 
You lie about what I say, you fail 5th grade civics class by confusing yourself on what impeachment is then quadruple down when I show you the relevant text from the constitution. You're embarrassing yourself.
you lie about what you say, you're a joke, a pandering troll who slurps up drumpfs spooge like it's manna from heaven. at best you're a stooge, worst case, you're a russian troll who gets off on perpetuating fake news, either way, you're a twatwaffle.
 
you lie about what you say, you're a joke, a pandering troll who slurps up drumpfs spooge like it's manna from heaven. at best you're a stooge, worst case, you're a russian troll who gets off on perpetuating fake news, either way, you're a twatwaffle.
I still am not the idiot who didn't know what impeachment was.
 
yes, you did return after all. kind of a shitty day. I'm not sure what the word for it is, but it isn't exactly entertaining, and it isn't exactly a disaster. It's something else. I think this needs a new word...
The Buckmeister: mundane, tedious, humdrum, commonplace, prosaic, uninspiring...
 
You lie about what I say, you fail 5th grade civics class by confusing yourself on what impeachment is then quadruple down when I show you the relevant text from the constitution. You're embarrassing yourself.

They don't teach impeachment in 5th grade. You would know this, if you hadn't dropped out in the 2nd.
 
Back
Top