Shocker! Hillary wants FL/MI delegates seated at convention

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
http://www.mlive.com/newsflash...storylist=michigannews



Clinton wants Michigan, Florida delegates to get convention seats
1/25/2008, 3:30 p.m. ET
By KATHY BARKS HOFFMAN
The Associated Press


LANSING, Mich. (AP) ? Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton wants delegates from Michigan and Florida to be seated at this summer's Democratic National Convention.

Although the Democratic National Committee's Rules Committee stripped Michigan and Florida of their delegates as punishment for moving up their presidential primaries, Clinton said Friday that she plans to ask her convention delegates to support seating the delegations.

"I believe our nominee will need the enthusiastic support of Democrats in these states to win the general election," she said in a statement, adding that it's important that "we have all 50 states represented and counted at the Democratic convention."

She added that she respected the position of her delegates from other states who may not vote to seat the Michigan and Florida delegates.

The New York senator also called on her Democratic rivals to make the same pledge.

David Plouffe, campaign manager for Barack Obama, said Clinton's move was just a political ploy.

"No one is more disappointed that Florida Democrats will have no role in selecting delegates for the nomination of the party's standard bearer than Sen. Obama," Plouffe said in a statement.

"When Sen. Clinton was campaigning in Iowa and New Hampshire, she made it clear that states like Michigan and Florida that wouldn't produce any delegates `don't count for anything.' Now that Sen. Clinton's worried about losing the first Southern primary, she's using Florida for her own political gain by trying to assign meaning to a contest that awards zero delegates and where no campaigning has occurred."

Florida has 185 pledged delegates and 25 superdelegates who face not being seated at the convention. The state holds its presidential primary on Tuesday.

Michigan, which held its primary Jan. 15, has been stripped by the DNC of its 156 delegates and its hotel rooms for the Aug. 25-28 Democratic National Convention in Denver.

But Michigan Democratic Chairman Mark Brewer has said all along that he expects the party's eventual nominee to ask that the delegates be seated.

Although there's no guarantee that Clinton will be the nominee or that other states' delegates will honor her request, he called her support for seating the delegates "very welcome news."

"We did expect in the end we would be seated, based on historical precedents of these types of sanctions being lifted in the past," he said Friday. "No candidate is going to commit political suicide by not seating Michigan."

A request for comment on Clinton's statement was left Friday afternoon with the John Edwards campaign.

Clinton was the only major candidate on the Democratic ballot in Michigan's primary. She ended up winning 55 percent of the vote, while 40 percent went to Uncommitted.

Most of the voters who chose uncommitted backed Obama or Edwards, who pulled their names from the ballot to avoid angering Iowa and New Hampshire, which didn't like other states crowding to the front of the election calendar.

The Michigan Democratic Party had planned to fill its 128 pledged delegate spots even after they'd been stripped by the Rules Committee. Brewer said he'll figure out how they'll be apportioned as soon as the election results are official. The party also has 28 superdelegates, most of them not pledged to a specific candidate.

Michigan Republicans have been stripped of half of their 60 national convention delegates for holding their primary Jan. 15. But the party still allocated all 57 of its 60 delegates based on the primary results, with 45 going to Mitt Romney, 10 to John McCain and two to Mike Huckabee. The GOP also has three unpledged delegates.
*****************************************************

I assume she wouldn't have done this if she hadn't won MI and had such a big lead in the FL polls, but that's like saying you shouldn't decline a roughing the passer penalty if you scored a TD on the play. Ok, that's not a great analogy, but I do wonder what Obama/Edwards would have said had they been in her position in such a tight race.

In related opinion, I don't like the way the primaries are set up with IA/NH getting all the love and I think it needs a shakeup. FL/MI are trying to do that and got smacked down for it. Maybe next time around the DNC will look at alternative primary methods instead of punishing those states trying to CHANGE, which everyone says they want.
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,195
126
It's ridiculous that DNC would disenfranchise them. There is nothing sacred about the order of the primaries. Since the state are the ones paying for them, the states can decide when to hold them. He who pays the piper calls the tune.
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,195
126
Hillary stood up to the DNC machine and let the voters of Florida and MI have a vote. Obama folded like a cheap suit.
So much for the "change" candidate.
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
Originally posted by: loki8481
no one made Edwards and Obama take their names off the ballot.

/shrug

They're all on it in FL. Polls indicate a sizeable double digit lead for Clinton. No doubt why she isn't waiting until after the vote to make the call for seating the delegates. Might win her a few extra votes. heh
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,195
126
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: loki8481
no one made Edwards and Obama take their names off the ballot.

/shrug

They're all on it in FL. Polls indicate a sizeable double digit lead for Clinton. No doubt why she isn't waiting until after the vote to make the call for seating the delegates. Might win her a few extra votes. heh

Democrats would be fools not to seat Florida at the convention. Talk about alienating voters in a state they need to win in November.
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
jeebus, that b*tch is more predictable than the sunrise... as are you senseamp. I wonder how you'd feel if the polls were in Obama's favor.. oh wait, I know exactly how you (and billary) would feel!

opportunistic shady hypocritical fvckwads - the whole lot of you! (anyone who supports this filthy sh*t from the Clinton campaign)
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
It's ridiculous that DNC would disenfranchise them. There is nothing sacred about the order of the primaries. Since the state are the ones paying for them, the states can decide when to hold them. He who pays the piper calls the tune.
The only thing ridiculous about this story is that Hillary wants to change the process now that she has a concern of not having enough delegates to claim the nomination.

Florida and Michigan moved up their primaries, and now face the penalty for doing so.

Obama and Edwards chose not to campaign there because those states were not in play...now suddenly Hillary wants them to come into play.

You want to talk about manipulating the political process...look no further than the Clinton campaign.

Democrats would be fools not to seat Florida at the convention. Talk about alienating voters in a state they need to win in November.
Something the Democrats need to figure out quickly...everything was in place under the assumption that Hillary would be the clear front runner...now everything is going to hell in a hand basket, and this fighting and maneuvering within the Democratic Party could cost them the General Election.

The Republicans have taken note...the candidates are playing nice...let the media scrutinize the Democrats, and in turn weaken their candidates.

no one made Edwards and Obama take their names off the ballot.
They did so in compliance with the DNC, and the Clinton campaign pulled a fast one.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
173
106
Originally posted by: senseamp
Hillary stood up to the DNC machine and let the voters of Florida and MI have a vote. Obama folded like a cheap suit.
So much for the "change" candidate.

ZOMG! LOL'ing :laugh:

You've taken Hillary fanboism to comic levels with this post.

Fern
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,816
83
91
Originally posted by: palehorse74
jeebus, that b*tch is more predictable than the sunrise... as are you senseamp. I wonder how you'd feel if the polls were in Obama's favor.. oh wait, I know exactly how you (and billary) would feel!

opportunistic shady hypocritical fvckwads - the whole lot of you! (anyone who supports this filthy sh*t from the Clinton campaign)

welcome to *gasp* politics.

you think any other candidate would do it differently?
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,195
126
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
It's ridiculous that DNC would disenfranchise them. There is nothing sacred about the order of the primaries. Since the state are the ones paying for them, the states can decide when to hold them. He who pays the piper calls the tune.
The only thing ridiculous about this story is that Hillary wants to change the process now that she has a concern of not having enough delegates to claim the nomination.

Florida and Michigan moved up their primaries, and now face the penalty for doing so.
But why should they face a penalty for voting when they chose? There is nothing sacred about the "process" that the DNC set up. Certainly disenfranchising voters is a lot more offensive than moving the primary date
Obama and Edwards chose not to campaign there because those states were not in play...now suddenly Hillary wants them to come into play.
They were not in play for them, but they were for Hillary. They made their decisions, she made hers. They have to live with those decisions.
You want to talk about manipulating the political process...look no further than the Clinton campaign.
If her fighting to have Florida and Michigan's votes counted is manipulating the political process, then so be it
Democrats would be fools not to seat Florida at the convention. Talk about alienating voters in a state they need to win in November.
Something the Democrats need to figure out quickly...everything was in place under the assumption that Hillary would be the clear front runner...now everything is going to hell in a hand basket, and this fighting and maneuvering within the Democratic Party could cost them the General Election.

The Republicans have taken note...the candidates are playing nice...let the media scrutinize the Democrats, and in turn weaken their candidates.

no one made Edwards and Obama take their names off the ballot.
They did so in compliance with the DNC, and the Clinton campaign pulled a fast one.

Absolutely right, Hillary is the only one who stood up to the DNC on this. The so called "independent" Obama threw Michigan voters under the bus to please the Democrat party establishment.
He needs to make a decision, does he want Florida votes counted or not? If he is for disenfranchising Florida to fit his political goals, then that's his position, but it won't be helpful when asking for their votes in November.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
173
106
Originally posted by: senseamp
Absolutely right, Hillary is the only one who stood up to the DNC on this.

I thought the "Clinton machine" controlled the DNC?

What'd she do, stand up to herself?

Fern
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,195
126
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: senseamp
Absolutely right, Hillary is the only one who stood up to the DNC on this.

I thought the "Clinton machine" controlled the DNC?

What'd she do, stand up to herself?

Fern

You thought wrong. Maybe try something other than thinking that you are good at? If Clinton machine controls the DNC as you claim, then why does she have to fight the DNC to count MI and FL votes?
 

chowderhead

Platinum Member
Dec 7, 1999
2,633
263
126
the Democratic nominee will decide whether to seat these delegates

"The reality is if you want to know if Florida is going to be seated, ask the Democratic nominee as soon as one emerges," Pelosi said.

Dean agreed.

"At the end of the day, the nominee will make a decision, essentially about who gets seated," Dean agreed.

Since Florida and Michigan are battleground states, there is no chance the delegates won't be seated.

The Clinton camp is in a win-win situation here. They are leading in Florida by 20%. No one can campaign there so that lead is relatively safe. They ask the other campaigns (Obama) to join them in asking to seat the delegates. If Obama agrees, it ups the stakes for Florida where Clinton is leading. If Obama refuses, he pisses off Floridan voters/activists.


 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,062
1
0
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: loki8481
no one made Edwards and Obama take their names off the ballot.

/shrug

They're all on it in FL. Polls indicate a sizeable double digit lead for Clinton. No doubt why she isn't waiting until after the vote to make the call for seating the delegates. Might win her a few extra votes. heh

Democrats would be fools not to seat Florida at the convention. Talk about alienating voters in a state they need to win in November.

yes because people are going to notice or care. (they aren't)

Everyone agreed to not participate in michigan and florida. How is any surprised to see hillary going back on her word and her fanboys getting right in line.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,816
83
91
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: loki8481
no one made Edwards and Obama take their names off the ballot.

/shrug

They're all on it in FL. Polls indicate a sizeable double digit lead for Clinton. No doubt why she isn't waiting until after the vote to make the call for seating the delegates. Might win her a few extra votes. heh

Democrats would be fools not to seat Florida at the convention. Talk about alienating voters in a state they need to win in November.

yes because people are going to notice or care. (they aren't)

Everyone agreed to not participate in michigan and florida. How is any surprised to see hillary going back on her word and her fanboys getting right in line.

they didn't agree not to participate, they agreed not to campaign there.
 
Jun 27, 2005
19,251
1
61
Wow... Do you mean to tell me that Hillary is trying to change the rules in the middle of the game? Say it ain't so... :shocked:

Really... where was her concern back before people started voting? NOW she wants to change the rules? Now, when the race becomes much tighter than she anticipated? What a shocker.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Nice trick by the Clinton campaign- campaigning for Florida instead of in Florida. I'm sure the other candidates would have done the same, if they'd thought of it first... Kinda loses its impact when you're just doing a "Me too!".

It's as Dean has said, that the nominee will likely allow both delegations to be seated...

And I think it's wrong to put this off on the DNC- their rules were in place long before the (repub) legislature in Florida used the situation to create discord among dems... Or to blame Hillary for using the repubs' guns against her primary opponents...

It actually shows a lot of savvy, and finesse, both desirable traits in a chief executive...
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
173
106
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: senseamp
Absolutely right, Hillary is the only one who stood up to the DNC on this.

I thought the "Clinton machine" controlled the DNC?

What'd she do, stand up to herself?

Fern

You thought wrong. Maybe try something other than thinking that you are good at? If Clinton machine controls the DNC as you claim, then why does she have to fight the DNC to count MI and FL votes?

You're the only one saying "fight" the DNC.

Look at the other posts here. The DNC basically said if she asks for them she gets them. Yeah, "tough fight".

Fern
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,816
83
91
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: senseamp
Absolutely right, Hillary is the only one who stood up to the DNC on this.

I thought the "Clinton machine" controlled the DNC?

What'd she do, stand up to herself?

Fern

You thought wrong. Maybe try something other than thinking that you are good at? If Clinton machine controls the DNC as you claim, then why does she have to fight the DNC to count MI and FL votes?

You're the only one saying "fight" the DNC.

Look at the other posts here. The DNC basically said if she asks for them she gets them. Yeah, "tough fight".

Fern

it's going to come down to a fight if it's still contested after super tuesday.
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,647
5,220
136
I can only imagine they would only be seated uncontested if there was a clear nominee. If its a brokered convention then, no way, but HillBillary is so desperate I don't put anything past her.

Clinton motto:

Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win! Cheat to win!