SETI - All Groups 14 Day Average

[Smoke]

The 14 Day Average Output of the Top Teams in the All Group Category has some interesting numbers.

Check it out.



Top Teams in All Groups Category Ranked by 14 Day Average

 

[Assimilator1]

Dang! DSLR beat us! .......oh but we did do well

 

[TuffGuy]

you should also calculated the average per member. notice how many more memebers they have than us.

 

[ShotgunSteven]

Well, I guess Team MacAddict is still cranking out some WU's after all. Guess they just do not feel like posting on the subject of SETI much.

 

[Assimilator1]

SB
I am unable to send you a PM atm ,I had reached the max limit but I've deleted them now & it still bars me from sending you (& just you!) a PM.

Anyway my answer is

I can't imagine heh

 

[Smoke]

OK, TuffGuy...Check it out now.

This brings up a topic that we (the TeAm) need to discuss.

The following is a list of Team AnandTech Members that have never done 1 WU and have been members for quite a while. All are older than 1 month. This does not include any of the members we have gotten to join us in the last month even though some of them have also not produced 1 WU.

I propose we drop the following members from our team roster.

1 Name: [NiB]BlacKnight 0
2 Name: acexg1 0
3 Name: Annie Lloyd 0
4 Name: anton 0
5 Name: bclapp 0
6 Name: chmtommy 0
7 Name: Chum 0
8 Name: Cooljoe327 0
9 Name: cyclone 0
10 Name: DHunter 0
11 Name: edog45 0
12 Name: err 0
13 Name: Fraga 0
14 Name: grieser 0
15 Name: Grimmwold 0
16 Name: HansMoleman 0
17 Name: hemkerbr 0
18 Name: Hooya 0
19 Name: huggi98 0
20 Name: ibanez2000 0
21 Name: Indmanz 0
22 Name: Jal 0
23 Name: jayBee 0
24 Name: John P. Kooistra 0
25 Name: Justin 0
26 Name: kaiotes 0
27 Name: Kevin Africa 0
28 Name: KnightCJD 0
29 Name: ku 0
30 Name: lantard 0
31 Name: ledgend 0
32 Name: legsh0t 0
33 Name: markjrubin 0
34 Name: MikroMak 0
35 Name: Mitaya 0
36 Name: Mong0 0
37 Name: netspyder 0
38 Name: Nikita 0
39 Name: NOendINsight (#2) 0
40 Name: NOZ 0
41 Name: Osiris-P4 0
42 Name: Oystram 0
43 Name: Petro 0
44 Name: PlasMaBall 0
45 Name: RazorJak 0
46 Name: Rebellion 0
47 Name: rectifyer 0
48 Name: ripper7 0
49 Name: RPM 0
50 Name: RSI 0
51 Name: simple 0
52 Name: Someguy 0
53 Name: spicydragon 0
54 Name: sta783 0
55 Name: Stian Sjøstrøm 0
56 Name: superles 0
57 Name: Three 0
58 Name: Tsunami 0
59 Name: TubaGod 0
60 Name: underdog 0
61 Name: Undertaker 0
62 Name: VampiR 0
63 Name: vman 0
64 Name: zarei 0
65 Name: zeb 0


What do you all think?

 

[soni]

I dont think we should drop any member off our roster!
What kind of message would that send, make something or get dumped :disgust:

We just have to accept that some members dont make any units, and perhaps try to get them to produce some, maybe by making a teamletter!

 

[Smoke]

I like the team letter idea.

Soni, you have a very good history of the team. Look at the members on the list I have created above and tell us (if you can) how long they have been members. I think these people may have thought about doing SETI and Joining the TeAm but for whatever reason have never followed through.

BTW, they would still be members of Team AnandTech. Only they can UNJOIN/QUIT a team. I'm talking about just removing their name from the current roster. I wouldn't want to do that until we have at least tried the letter. I'll compose up something and see what you all think.

 

[ShotgunSteven]

Well, I would hate for someone to decide to start crunching WU's, only to find out their team has booted them for being unproductive for an extended period of time. That being said, SETI@Home is the kind of thing that people start out doing, and some discover there is no instant gratification, so drop it. I would say if they have been inactive for a couple of months, drop them. If they want to do SETI at a later date, they can always rejoin.

SETI@Home=FUN!

 

[ShotgunSteven]

Perhaps a special team newsletter to inactive members, requesting their status? Could be some just got frustrated with it like I first did when trying to get the CLI version set up on that LAN, and threw up their hands in disgust. Ask them to confirm if they still have any interest in participating? I would love to see more active people doing SETI and posting here.

 

[TuffGuy]

<< OK, TuffGuy...Check it out now. >>


thanks. looks much better now.

 

[serialb]

To the inactive members, I suggest sending them a Team Letter to their SETI registered account. If any of those e-mail get bounced back, we should safely remove those accounts.

serialb

 

[ShotgunSteven]

<< To the inactive members, I suggest sending them a Team Letter to their SETI registered account. If any of those e-mail get bounced back, we should safely remove those accounts.

serialb >>



Good plan. Who is in charge of stuff like this? Maybe it should be done with one of those anonymous SETI e-mail accounts that were set up?

Edit: Actually, that would probably turn them off, as opposed to the "personal touch." Scratch that idea.

 

[BadThad]

Thanks SB, interesting.

IMO all members with ZERO wu's and no activity for 1 year should be removed from the team. If there is a bizzare chance they want to come back, which I seriously doubt, they can always rejoin...no big deal.

 

[Assimilator1]

Smokeball
Some of this sounds familar,here we go again
Maybe now is the time to start Phase 2 ? (ie personal E mails to bigger inactive members to try to get them crunchin again?)

Serialb
Good idea but wouldn't that be considered spam?

Btw Soni & Smokeball
Do either of you guys remember what the thread was called adressing this issue soem months ago?.I couldn't find it

 

[serialb]

Assim1,

Ouch... Wouldn't the word "spam" a little harsh in this case?? I call it a "friendly update" Plus, when they join Team AnandTech, they should realize that their SETI registered e-mail can be accessed by the Team founder.

Just an idea throwing around though.

serialb

 

[Assimilator1]

they should realize that their SETI registered e-mail can be accessed by the Team founder
Very true ,but I believe there are rules governing what the Email adds can be used for ,though I've never actually seen them myself.

Btw ,didn't mean to be harsh ,sorry

Maybe MGALLIK or HELLBURNER could answer this question?

 

[Smoke]

Btw Soni & Smokeball
Do either of you guys remember what the thread was called adressing this issue soem months ago?.I couldn't find it

I think it is in the Dead Letter File now.

 

[Assimilator1]

a?

 

[soni]

This is the list
Name, date joined Team Anandtech - 24.10.2000 is the day I started tracking the dates, so some can be/are older than that
All these have 0 WU, so they havent made one WU EVER..

I havent taken any members newer than 30 days (there are 63)

Annie Lloyd - 24.10.2000
anton - 24.10.2000
Fraga - 24.10.2000
Grimmwold - 24.10.2000
hemkerbr - 24.10.2000
Indmanz - 24.10.2000
John P. Kooistra - 24.10.2000
Justin - 24.10.2000
markjrubin - 24.10.2000
Nikita - 24.10.2000
PlasMaBall - 24.10.2000
Rebellion - 24.10.2000
RSI - 24.10.2000
TubaGod - 24.10.2000
Undertaker - 24.10.2000
vman - 24.10.2000
zeb - 24.10.2000
chmtommy - 14.12.2000
grieser - 14.12.2000
MikroMak - 14.12.2000
Stian Sj&oslash;str&oslash;m - 14.12.2000
zarei - 14.12.2000
Three - 15.12.2000
huggi98 - 16.12.2000
[NiB]BlacKnight - 18.12.2000
err - 18.12.2000
jayBee - 20.12.2000
underdog - 22.12.2000
Osiris-P4 - 01.01.2001
ibanez2000 - 02.01.2001
legsh0t - 04.01.2001
rectifyer - 08.01.2001
simple - 21.01.2001
sta783 - 22.01.2001
Kevin Africa - 01.02.2001
RPM - 02.02.2001
KnightCJD - 06.02.2001
ripper7 - 15.02.2001
bclapp - 16.02.2001
DHunter - 18.02.2001
Someguy - 06.03.2001
Petro - 11.03.2001
cyclone - 23.03.2001
RazorJak - 01.04.2001
ku - 02.04.2001
Oystram - 05.04.2001
VampiR - 06.04.2001
NOZ - 07.04.2001
netspyder - 18.04.2001
acexg1 - 23.04.2001
superles - 03.05.2001
lantard - 12.05.2001
ledgend - 18.05.2001
Mitaya - 21.05.2001
kaiotes - 23.05.2001
spicydragon - 24.05.2001
Jal - 27.05.2001
Tsunami - 14.06.2001
HansMoleman - 28.06.2001
Cooljoe327 - 27.07.2001
Hooya - 31.07.2001
Mong0 - 05.08.2001
Chum - 16.08.2001

 

[soni]

Smokeball

Just to compare with your list
These are sorted alphabetic, like your list

[NiB]BlacKnight - 18.12.2000
acexg1 - 23.04.2001
Annie Lloyd - 24.10.2000
anton - 24.10.2000
bclapp - 16.02.2001
chmtommy - 14.12.2000
Chum - 16.08.2001
Cooljoe327 - 27.07.2001
cyclone - 23.03.2001
DHunter - 18.02.2001
err - 18.12.2000
Fraga - 24.10.2000
grieser - 14.12.2000
Grimmwold - 24.10.2000
HansMoleman - 28.06.2001
hemkerbr - 24.10.2000
Hooya - 31.07.2001
huggi98 - 16.12.2000
ibanez2000 - 02.01.2001
Indmanz - 24.10.2000
Jal - 27.05.2001
jayBee - 20.12.2000
John P. Kooistra - 24.10.2000
Justin - 24.10.2000
kaiotes - 23.05.2001
Kevin Africa - 01.02.2001
KnightCJD - 06.02.2001
ku - 02.04.2001
lantard - 12.05.2001
ledgend - 18.05.2001
legsh0t - 04.01.2001
markjrubin - 24.10.2000
MikroMak - 14.12.2000
Mitaya - 21.05.2001
Mong0 - 05.08.2001
netspyder - 18.04.2001
Nikita - 24.10.2000
NOZ - 07.04.2001
Osiris-P4 - 01.01.2001
Oystram - 05.04.2001
Petro - 11.03.2001
PlasMaBall - 24.10.2000
RazorJak - 01.04.2001
Rebellion - 24.10.2000
rectifyer - 08.01.2001
ripper7 - 15.02.2001
RPM - 02.02.2001
RSI - 24.10.2000
simple - 21.01.2001
Someguy - 06.03.2001
spicydragon - 24.05.2001
sta783 - 22.01.2001
Stian Sj&oslash;str&oslash;m - 14.12.2000
superles - 03.05.2001
Three - 15.12.2000
Tsunami - 14.06.2001
TubaGod - 24.10.2000
underdog - 22.12.2000
Undertaker - 24.10.2000
VampiR - 06.04.2001
vman - 24.10.2000
zarei - 14.12.2000
zeb - 24.10.2000

 

[Smoke]

Thanks Soni,

BadThad had a pretty good idea, IMHO, we could email those members who have never produced one WU and have been a member for over one year. If they don't respond or respond unfavorably, their name would be deleted from the active roster. Now before someone asks...the "active" roster is my terminology...as far as I know there is no "inactive" or "active" roster...only "the" roster.

That could be setup as a "team policy" and it would be an automatic thing that the team administrators would handle. I could provide "them" with regular updates as to which names should be removed.

I could start by using the history that Soni has provided and keep it chronologically. Perhaps, once a month the purge process could be done.

How say you active members of Team AnandTech?

 

[toft-dk]

I think that's a good idea Smokeball

BTW Good stats from us over this 14 day period

 

[Eponymous]

Going back to the orignal post for just a second (yeah I know)

If CobraIce made his own team and joined it, would he have made the Top TeAms list on production?

 

[Smoke]

CobraIce, aka I'm simply the best! , aka "The Q", has approximately 190,000 WUs which if he was his own team would make him the #106th Team in the All Groups Category.

Some other interesting things that would take place if CobraIce ever decided to join Team AnandTech (which is what I'm sure some of you might be wondering about) :

1. In not too many days from now, his # of WUs would instantly place Team AnandTech above IBM.

2. Adding his daily average to that of Team AnandTech would make Team AnandTech the #1 Team in the World in Daily Average Production.

3. And then what would follow...someday in the future, Team AnandTech would become #1 in the World!

4. And all the while, CobraIce could be continuing his quest to become the #1 Seti Producer in the World...which also some day in the future would happen!

Now, this is not a recruitment thread...it is just playing what if!