Senate Armed Services Committee Reports Bush Admin Responsible For Torture Abuses.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Here is the wall that you will never be able to climb, Harvey

The Military Commissions Act defines certain prohibitions of Common Article 3 for United States law, and it reaffirms and reinforces the authority of the President to interpret the meaning and application of the Geneva Conventions.
------------------------------------------------------------------

We are a nation of Laws and rules. Pretty much guarantees that anyone with the power to make a law or rule can do what they feel they are compelled to do.

You can express outrage, but that is all you can do, unless you are willing to live outside the confines of these Laws and rules we have.

That's an executive order CLAIMING that the executive has the power to do what you just said. We are indeed a nation of laws and rules, and a major rule is something President Bush and his supporters seem to be unfamiliar with...it's called "separation of powers", and it basically says that the President can't define his own authority outside the scope allowed by the constitution and the other two branches of government (to whom this rule obviously also applies).

Of COURSE the President is going to issue an executive order saying he has the power to do whatever the hell he wants, that doesn't mean it's legal.
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,059
73
91
Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: Harvey

tragic black stain on our once proud, once honorable nation. :(

As opposed to the white stain Clinton left in the Oval Office. :p

How many illegal wars did Clinton start?

How many American troops died in those wars he didn't start?

How many illegal searches of American citizens' telephone an Internet activity did Clinton start?

I could rehash all of my "macros," but lame right wing tin foil losers like you already know them.

The old "Clinton did it" dodge does NOT apply. There is NO equivalency between anything and everything wrong or illegal that happened under Clinton and the crimes of your Traitor In Chief and his criminal cabal.
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: Harvey

tragic black stain on our once proud, once honorable nation. :(

As opposed to the white stain Clinton left in the Oval Office. :p

How many illegal wars did Clinton start?

How many American troops died in those wars he didn't start?

How many illegal searches of American citizens' telephone an Internet activity did Clinton start?

I could rehash all of my "macros," but lame right wing tin foil losers like you already know them.

The old "Clinton did it" dodge does NOT apply. There is NO equivalency between anything and everything wrong or illegal that happened under Clinton and the crimes of your Traitor In Chief and his criminal cabal.

Kennedy and Johnson did it.

Oh, and the numbers are 1, 58000, and unknown, respectively, although we do know Martin Luther King was included in the wiretaps.
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,059
73
91
Originally posted by: loozar111

Kennedy and Johnson did it.

Great. I agree that the war in Vietnam was an illegal war of lies. I opposed that war, too. You're welcome to go back in time, and convict them for whatever crimes you want to prove. If you figure out how, I'll help.

That still doesn't excuse your Traitor In Chief and his criminal cabal of traitors, murderers, torturers, war criminals, war profiteers and Wall Street robber barons for any of their crimes. The most important difference is, they're still here where we can AND SHOULD try, convict and imprison them.
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: loozar111

Kennedy and Johnson did it.

Great. I agree that the war in Vietnam was an illegal war of lies. I opposed that war, too. You're welcome to go back in time, and convict them for whatever crimes you want to prove. If you figure out how, I'll help.

That still doesn't excuse your Traitor In Chief and his criminal cabal of traitors, murderers, torturers, war criminals, war profiteers and Wall Street robber barons for any of their crimes. The most important difference is, they're still here where we can AND SHOULD try, convict and imprison them.

Actually, they're gone in a month too. Can you shut up then?
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,059
73
91
Originally posted by: loozar111

That still doesn't excuse your Traitor In Chief and his criminal cabal of traitors, murderers, torturers, war criminals, war profiteers and Wall Street robber barons for any of their crimes. The most important difference is, they're still here where we can AND SHOULD try, convict and imprison them.

Actually, they're gone in a month too.[/quote]

Actually, they'll still be alive in a month so they'll be ripe for trial, conviction and imprisonment.

Can you shut up then?

No, as a matter of fact, I can't, and I won't. But you can :lips: my (_!_), then.
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Originally posted by: Harvey

Actually, they'll still be alive in a month so they'll be ripe for trial, conviction and imprisonment.

Can you shut up then?

No, as a matter of fact, I can't, and I won't. But you can :lips: my (_!_), then.

Hmm, Bob Mcnamara's still alive too, and Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd were Senators when the Gulf of Tonkin was passed. Are you going to go after them too?

In any case, seems like your black stain occured 40 years ago.
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,059
73
91
Originally posted by: loozar111

Hmm, Bob Mcnamara's still alive too, and Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd were Senators when the Gulf of Tonkin was passed. Are you going to go after them too?

As a matter of fact, Robert McNamara is probably one of those who should be called to account for his part in Vietnam. Even more so for the secret bombing of Cambodia.

Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd were not in the executive branch and didn't have the same ability as the sitting Presidents, then, to pursue that illegal war or your Traitor In Chief and his criminal gang, to start their illegal war in Iraq, commit treason, torture, war crimes, war profiteering and fiscal corruption, now.

How about this? You can advocate bringing those you name from the past to justice, I'll stick with pursuing your Traitor In Chief and his thugs, and we can both support trying, convicting and imprisoning any of that entire group who are proven guilty.

That's fair all the way around. Deal? :cool:
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: winnar111

Hmm, Bob Mcnamara's still alive too, and Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd were Senators when the Gulf of Tonkin was passed. Are you going to go after them too?

As a matter of fact, Robert McNamara is probably one of those who should be called to account for his part in Vietnam. Even more so for the secret bombing of Cambodia.

Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd were not in the executive branch and didn't have the same ability as the sitting Presidents, then, to pursue that illegal war or your Traitor In Chief and his criminal gang, to start their illegal war in Iraq, commit treason, torture, war crimes, war profiteering and fiscal corruption, now.

How about this? You can advocate bringing those you name from the past to justice, I'll stick with pursuing your Traitor In Chief and his thugs, and we can both support trying, convicting and imprisoning any of that entire group who are proven guilty.

That's fair all the way around. Deal? :cool:

Sure, as long as Bush's 'trial' occurs 40 years after the fact.
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,059
73
91
Originally posted by: loozar111
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: loozar111

Hmm, Bob Mcnamara's still alive too, and Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd were Senators when the Gulf of Tonkin was passed. Are you going to go after them too?

As a matter of fact, Robert McNamara is probably one of those who should be called to account for his part in Vietnam. Even more so for the secret bombing of Cambodia.

Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd were not in the executive branch and didn't have the same ability as the sitting Presidents, then, to pursue that illegal war or your Traitor In Chief and his criminal gang, to start their illegal war in Iraq, commit treason, torture, war crimes, war profiteering and fiscal corruption, now.

How about this? You can advocate bringing those you name from the past to justice, I'll stick with pursuing your Traitor In Chief and his thugs, and we can both support trying, convicting and imprisoning any of that entire group who are proven guilty.

That's fair all the way around. Deal? :cool:

Sure, as long as Bush's 'trial' occurs 40 years after the fact.

HELL NO! I won't wait. Justice delayed is justice denied. As of 12/10/08, 4,209 American troops have died, and tens of thousands more American troops are wounded, scarred and disabled for life in your Traitor In Chief's war of LIES.
rose.gif
:(

Waiting would dishonor their service, their memory and everything they fought to defend. Would you do that to them? :shocked:
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: loozar111
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: loozar111

Hmm, Bob Mcnamara's still alive too, and Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd were Senators when the Gulf of Tonkin was passed. Are you going to go after them too?

As a matter of fact, Robert McNamara is probably one of those who should be called to account for his part in Vietnam. Even more so for the secret bombing of Cambodia.

Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd were not in the executive branch and didn't have the same ability as the sitting Presidents, then, to pursue that illegal war or your Traitor In Chief and his criminal gang, to start their illegal war in Iraq, commit treason, torture, war crimes, war profiteering and fiscal corruption, now.

How about this? You can advocate bringing those you name from the past to justice, I'll stick with pursuing your Traitor In Chief and his thugs, and we can both support trying, convicting and imprisoning any of that entire group who are proven guilty.

That's fair all the way around. Deal? :cool:

Sure, as long as Bush's 'trial' occurs 40 years after the fact.

HELL NO! I won't wait. Justice delayed is justice denied. As of 12/10/08, 4,209 American troops have died, and tens of thousands more American troops are wounded, scarred and disabled for life in your Traitor In Chief's war of LIES.
rose.gif
:(

Waiting would dishonor their service, their memory and everything they fought to defend. Would you do that to them? :shocked:

Ah, while we're charging people left and right, can we charge Clinton with killing all those Somalian civilians?

Also, why are Kennedy and Johnson referred to as 'Presidents' while Bush is a 'Traitor in Chief'?
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: fallout man
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Harvey
I hope they push this to prosecute everyone involved in this sad, tragic black stain on our once proud, once honorable nation.

Hopefully the Hague comes a calling

Oh please. They wouldn't be able to prosecute a stale cheese vendor without US help these days.

I hope that Obama has the HUGE BIG BALLS his supporters (including myself) were hoping for, and will facilitate accountability for the past eight years of pure cluster-fuck.

I don't expect a GW Bush criminal case. I don't think it will make me feel any better about the last eight years of the rape upon what the United States stands for and represents.

What I would like to see is the persecution, prosecution, and conviction of every single little two-bit motherfucker involved in the Bush team who broke laws. It will be sweeter to watch Ol' Walker see his croneys heading off to the slammer and not being able to do anything about it. It will be a delicious hell for someone who disregarded the public's interest (and countless lives) to satisfy the interest of his closest circles.

It's so unlikely that this parasite of a human being is held truly accountable, that I'm personally willing to concede the living punishment of his brief "success" of making friends successful come un-done by virtue of his buddies coming under indictment.

As far as the man himself, he will have to answer to someone who made his own laws, a very long time ago. I'd love to be a fly on the wall at the Pearly Gates when GW spawns at the entrance.
Personally, yep, I would feel better to see Bush prosecuted. No, it won't reverse the ills he's waged on the world, but it would be better than nothing.

 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: fallout man
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Harvey
I hope they push this to prosecute everyone involved in this sad, tragic black stain on our once proud, once honorable nation.

Hopefully the Hague comes a calling

Oh please. They wouldn't be able to prosecute a stale cheese vendor without US help these days.

I hope that Obama has the HUGE BIG BALLS his supporters (including myself) were hoping for, and will facilitate accountability for the past eight years of pure cluster-fuck.

I don't expect a GW Bush criminal case. I don't think it will make me feel any better about the last eight years of the rape upon what the United States stands for and represents.

What I would like to see is the persecution, prosecution, and conviction of every single little two-bit motherfucker involved in the Bush team who broke laws. It will be sweeter to watch Ol' Walker see his croneys heading off to the slammer and not being able to do anything about it. It will be a delicious hell for someone who disregarded the public's interest (and countless lives) to satisfy the interest of his closest circles.

It's so unlikely that this parasite of a human being is held truly accountable, that I'm personally willing to concede the living punishment of his brief "success" of making friends successful come un-done by virtue of his buddies coming under indictment.

As far as the man himself, he will have to answer to someone who made his own laws, a very long time ago. I'd love to be a fly on the wall at the Pearly Gates when GW spawns at the entrance.
Personally, yep, I would feel better to see Bush prosecuted. No, it won't reverse the ills he's waged on the world, but it would be better than nothing.

Don't worry, Obama is going to bring Chicago Political integrity back to the white house.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: fallout man
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Harvey
I hope they push this to prosecute everyone involved in this sad, tragic black stain on our once proud, once honorable nation.

Hopefully the Hague comes a calling

Oh please. They wouldn't be able to prosecute a stale cheese vendor without US help these days.

I hope that Obama has the HUGE BIG BALLS his supporters (including myself) were hoping for, and will facilitate accountability for the past eight years of pure cluster-fuck.

I don't expect a GW Bush criminal case. I don't think it will make me feel any better about the last eight years of the rape upon what the United States stands for and represents.

What I would like to see is the persecution, prosecution, and conviction of every single little two-bit motherfucker involved in the Bush team who broke laws. It will be sweeter to watch Ol' Walker see his croneys heading off to the slammer and not being able to do anything about it. It will be a delicious hell for someone who disregarded the public's interest (and countless lives) to satisfy the interest of his closest circles.

It's so unlikely that this parasite of a human being is held truly accountable, that I'm personally willing to concede the living punishment of his brief "success" of making friends successful come un-done by virtue of his buddies coming under indictment.

As far as the man himself, he will have to answer to someone who made his own laws, a very long time ago. I'd love to be a fly on the wall at the Pearly Gates when GW spawns at the entrance.
Personally, yep, I would feel better to see Bush prosecuted. No, it won't reverse the ills he's waged on the world, but it would be better than nothing.

Don't worry, Obama is going to bring Chicago Political integrity back to the white house.

Even if he was, I personally think that would be an improvement. I'd rather have a really good politician, which Obama has shown every sign of being, but if I had to choose, I'd take dishonest politicians over people who think it's perfectly OK to shred the Constitution whenever it's convenient.
 

fallout man

Golden Member
Nov 20, 2007
1,787
1
0
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: fallout man
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Harvey
I hope they push this to prosecute everyone involved in this sad, tragic black stain on our once proud, once honorable nation.

Hopefully the Hague comes a calling

Oh please. They wouldn't be able to prosecute a stale cheese vendor without US help these days.

I hope that Obama has the HUGE BIG BALLS his supporters (including myself) were hoping for, and will facilitate accountability for the past eight years of pure cluster-fuck.

I don't expect a GW Bush criminal case. I don't think it will make me feel any better about the last eight years of the rape upon what the United States stands for and represents.

What I would like to see is the persecution, prosecution, and conviction of every single little two-bit motherfucker involved in the Bush team who broke laws. It will be sweeter to watch Ol' Walker see his croneys heading off to the slammer and not being able to do anything about it. It will be a delicious hell for someone who disregarded the public's interest (and countless lives) to satisfy the interest of his closest circles.

It's so unlikely that this parasite of a human being is held truly accountable, that I'm personally willing to concede the living punishment of his brief "success" of making friends successful come un-done by virtue of his buddies coming under indictment.

As far as the man himself, he will have to answer to someone who made his own laws, a very long time ago. I'd love to be a fly on the wall at the Pearly Gates when GW spawns at the entrance.
Personally, yep, I would feel better to see Bush prosecuted. No, it won't reverse the ills he's waged on the world, but it would be better than nothing.

Don't worry, Obama is going to bring Chicago Political integrity back to the white house.

What's Chicago politics, precious?
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: fallout man
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: fallout man
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Harvey
I hope they push this to prosecute everyone involved in this sad, tragic black stain on our once proud, once honorable nation.

Hopefully the Hague comes a calling

Oh please. They wouldn't be able to prosecute a stale cheese vendor without US help these days.

I hope that Obama has the HUGE BIG BALLS his supporters (including myself) were hoping for, and will facilitate accountability for the past eight years of pure cluster-fuck.

I don't expect a GW Bush criminal case. I don't think it will make me feel any better about the last eight years of the rape upon what the United States stands for and represents.

What I would like to see is the persecution, prosecution, and conviction of every single little two-bit motherfucker involved in the Bush team who broke laws. It will be sweeter to watch Ol' Walker see his croneys heading off to the slammer and not being able to do anything about it. It will be a delicious hell for someone who disregarded the public's interest (and countless lives) to satisfy the interest of his closest circles.

It's so unlikely that this parasite of a human being is held truly accountable, that I'm personally willing to concede the living punishment of his brief "success" of making friends successful come un-done by virtue of his buddies coming under indictment.

As far as the man himself, he will have to answer to someone who made his own laws, a very long time ago. I'd love to be a fly on the wall at the Pearly Gates when GW spawns at the entrance.
Personally, yep, I would feel better to see Bush prosecuted. No, it won't reverse the ills he's waged on the world, but it would be better than nothing.

Don't worry, Obama is going to bring Chicago Political integrity back to the white house.

What's Chicago politics, precious?

The latest right-wing meme...which they all just happened to independently think up at exactly the same time.
 

fallout man

Golden Member
Nov 20, 2007
1,787
1
0
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: fallout man

What's Chicago politics, precious?

The latest right-wing meme...which they all just happened to independently think up at exactly the same time.

Stop giving away the answers!!! This is a timed test, and serious business. I want this toolshed to explain himself without your cliff-notes. ;)

Baby just wants a definition of "Chicago politics," summarized in one or two sentences.
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,059
73
91
Originally posted by: loozar111

Ah, while we're charging people left and right, can we charge Clinton with killing all those Somalian civilians?

Also, why are Kennedy and Johnson referred to as 'Presidents' while Bush is a 'Traitor in Chief'?

Do it if you can make it stick, jackass. That's still not an excuse from charging your Traitor In Chief and his criminal gang of traitors, murderers, war criminals and war profiteers for their crimes.

Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Don't worry, Obama is going to bring Chicago Political integrity back to the white house.

You pissy, whining neocon losers keep telling us how corrupt Obama's administration is going to be, but you have YET to present one (count them on one finger) piece of evidence to support your bullshit. Yet, you still keep ducking the issues of the crimes committed by the Bushwhackos, as DOCUMENTED by the Senate Armed Services Committee's report.

As I said to loozar111, prove your accusations against Obama if you can, but UNTIL you can provide such evidence, just slink off into your slime pit, and sit on your thumb and twirl.

Meanwhile, George W. Bush and his gang MURDERED over 4,000 American troops in their war of LIES in Iraq and committed torture and other horrific war crimes and crimes against humanity. If YOU don't have the balls, let alone the brains to stand against and hold them accountable for their horrific crimes, YOU dishonor the service and the memory of our fallen troops and everything they fought for and died to defend.

YOU are truly pathetic! :thumbsdown: :|
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: fallout man
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Harvey
I hope they push this to prosecute everyone involved in this sad, tragic black stain on our once proud, once honorable nation.

Hopefully the Hague comes a calling

Oh please. They wouldn't be able to prosecute a stale cheese vendor without US help these days.

I hope that Obama has the HUGE BIG BALLS his supporters (including myself) were hoping for, and will facilitate accountability for the past eight years of pure cluster-fuck.

I don't expect a GW Bush criminal case. I don't think it will make me feel any better about the last eight years of the rape upon what the United States stands for and represents.

What I would like to see is the persecution, prosecution, and conviction of every single little two-bit motherfucker involved in the Bush team who broke laws. It will be sweeter to watch Ol' Walker see his croneys heading off to the slammer and not being able to do anything about it. It will be a delicious hell for someone who disregarded the public's interest (and countless lives) to satisfy the interest of his closest circles.

It's so unlikely that this parasite of a human being is held truly accountable, that I'm personally willing to concede the living punishment of his brief "success" of making friends successful come un-done by virtue of his buddies coming under indictment.

As far as the man himself, he will have to answer to someone who made his own laws, a very long time ago. I'd love to be a fly on the wall at the Pearly Gates when GW spawns at the entrance.
Personally, yep, I would feel better to see Bush prosecuted. No, it won't reverse the ills he's waged on the world, but it would be better than nothing.

Don't worry, Obama is going to bring Chicago Political integrity back to the white house.

Even if he was, I personally think that would be an improvement. I'd rather have a really good politician, which Obama has shown every sign of being, but if I had to choose, I'd take dishonest politicians over people who think it's perfectly OK to shred the Constitution whenever it's convenient.

Riight.. because pay for play doesn't shred the constitution?
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Originally posted by: fallout man
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: fallout man
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Harvey
I hope they push this to prosecute everyone involved in this sad, tragic black stain on our once proud, once honorable nation.

Hopefully the Hague comes a calling

Oh please. They wouldn't be able to prosecute a stale cheese vendor without US help these days.

I hope that Obama has the HUGE BIG BALLS his supporters (including myself) were hoping for, and will facilitate accountability for the past eight years of pure cluster-fuck.

I don't expect a GW Bush criminal case. I don't think it will make me feel any better about the last eight years of the rape upon what the United States stands for and represents.

What I would like to see is the persecution, prosecution, and conviction of every single little two-bit motherfucker involved in the Bush team who broke laws. It will be sweeter to watch Ol' Walker see his croneys heading off to the slammer and not being able to do anything about it. It will be a delicious hell for someone who disregarded the public's interest (and countless lives) to satisfy the interest of his closest circles.

It's so unlikely that this parasite of a human being is held truly accountable, that I'm personally willing to concede the living punishment of his brief "success" of making friends successful come un-done by virtue of his buddies coming under indictment.

As far as the man himself, he will have to answer to someone who made his own laws, a very long time ago. I'd love to be a fly on the wall at the Pearly Gates when GW spawns at the entrance.
Personally, yep, I would feel better to see Bush prosecuted. No, it won't reverse the ills he's waged on the world, but it would be better than nothing.

Don't worry, Obama is going to bring Chicago Political integrity back to the white house.

What's Chicago politics, precious?

I said 'Chicago Political Integrity'.. Still need a definition?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,265
55,850
136
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Riight.. because pay for play doesn't shred the constitution?

What section of it do you think it shreds? Sure it's bad in plenty of other ways, but it's not the unprecedented assault on the separation of powers and the bill of rights that Bush engaged in. Neither Rainsford or myself is stating that we want corruption in the executive (and there of course is zero evidence of any), but a merely corrupt executive is far preferable in my mind to one that is assaulting the founding document for our country.
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,059
73
91
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Riight.. because pay for play doesn't shred the constitution?

Hey... As long as you're not trying to tell us that some wrong you perceive justifies another, all you have to do is prove your claims, instead of spewing a bunch of smoke.

If you think Obama has violated your Constitutional rights, follow eskimospy's suggestion. Check out the Constitution, and come back to tell us which article or amendment you believe has been violated by whom.

Hell!! If can you make your point based on the facts, I'll stand with you against whoever's guilty. :)

You can search for my posts detailing names, dates, facts and statutes George W. Bush and his gang have violated. If it's important enough for you, I can bore the regulars with another posting of one or more of my "macros," stored text files formatted with links, fonts, etc.

Or you can take my word for it. :p
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: loozar111

Ah, while we're charging people left and right, can we charge Clinton with killing all those Somalian civilians?

Also, why are Kennedy and Johnson referred to as 'Presidents' while Bush is a 'Traitor in Chief'?

Do it if you can make it stick, jackass. That's still not an excuse from charging your Traitor In Chief and his criminal gang of traitors, murderers, war criminals and war profiteers for their crimes.

Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Don't worry, Obama is going to bring Chicago Political integrity back to the white house.

You pissy, whining neocon losers keep telling us how corrupt Obama's administration is going to be, but you have YET to present one (count them on one finger) piece of evidence to support your bullshit. Yet, you still keep ducking the issues of the crimes committed by the Bushwhackos, as DOCUMENTED by the Senate Armed Services Committee's report.

As I said to loozar111, prove your accusations against Obama if you can, but UNTIL you can provide such evidence, just slink off into your slime pit, and sit on your thumb and twirl.

Meanwhile, George W. Bush and his gang MURDERED over 4,000 American troops in their war of LIES in Iraq and committed torture and other horrific war crimes and crimes against humanity. If YOU don't have the balls, let alone the brains to stand against and hold them accountable for their horrific crimes, YOU dishonor the service and the memory of our fallen troops and everything they fought for and died to defend.

YOU are truly pathetic! :thumbsdown: :|

I said 'Obama is going to bring', which means the future.. which means I am predicting it.. which means it hasn't happened yet, which means I cannot provide any proof because it hasn't happened.. YET..

Just curious, if Obama doesn't immediately pull us out of Iraq is he responsible for deaths as well? Or are you just going to continue to blame Bush for everything?

Surely if you had all this proof of Bush you could get SOMEONE in government to listen to you? I want PROOF you have presented any of this evidence you have to someone in a position to do something about it. Anything other than PROOF means you are nothing but an internet LIAR sitting behind his keyboard MURDERING more troops by not putting an end to this Bush regime.

I love this game! Its fun! I gotta get more macros set up. It will add to my credibility if I just repeat the same stuff over and over!
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: loozar111

Ah, while we're charging people left and right, can we charge Clinton with killing all those Somalian civilians?

Also, why are Kennedy and Johnson referred to as 'Presidents' while Bush is a 'Traitor in Chief'?

Do it if you can make it stick, jackass. That's still not an excuse from charging your Traitor In Chief and his criminal gang of traitors, murderers, war criminals and war profiteers for their crimes.

Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Don't worry, Obama is going to bring Chicago Political integrity back to the white house.

You pissy, whining neocon losers keep telling us how corrupt Obama's administration is going to be, but you have YET to present one (count them on one finger) piece of evidence to support your bullshit. Yet, you still keep ducking the issues of the crimes committed by the Bushwhackos, as DOCUMENTED by the Senate Armed Services Committee's report.

As I said to loozar111, prove your accusations against Obama if you can, but UNTIL you can provide such evidence, just slink off into your slime pit, and sit on your thumb and twirl.

Meanwhile, George W. Bush and his gang MURDERED over 4,000 American troops in their war of LIES in Iraq and committed torture and other horrific war crimes and crimes against humanity. If YOU don't have the balls, let alone the brains to stand against and hold them accountable for their horrific crimes, YOU dishonor the service and the memory of our fallen troops and everything they fought for and died to defend.

YOU are truly pathetic! :thumbsdown: :|

I said 'Obama is going to bring', which means the future.. which means I am predicting it.. which means it hasn't happened yet, which means I cannot provide any proof because it hasn't happened.. YET..

Just curious, if Obama doesn't immediately pull us out of Iraq is he responsible for deaths as well? Or are you just going to continue to blame Bush for everything?

Surely if you had all this proof of Bush you could get SOMEONE in government to listen to you? I want PROOF you have presented any of this evidence you have to someone in a position to do something about it. Anything other than PROOF means you are nothing but an internet LIAR sitting behind his keyboard MURDERING more troops by not putting an end to this Bush regime.

I love this game! Its fun! I gotta get more macros set up. It will add to my credibility if I just repeat the same stuff over and over!

You are, literally, arguing with a Macro that is programmed in BDS...you realize this, right? It's your free time....just letting you know....

Chuck