Sen. Sinema chased into and videoed in bathroom by leftists

[imported_tajmahal]

How much do you think the 1% would pay to keep Democrats from helping the average citizen. What if people had proof that socialist policies are good for most of humanity? No matter the cost, that must never happen. And there are always those hollow inside who will sell their souls for 30 pieces of silver.

Most of the 1% ARE Democrats Moonie.

 

[MrSquished]

Yes, the rich and wealthy people in the class she teaches at...... ASU? She campaigned as a moderate and it's where she is right now.

You are just incapable of posting anything with an honest take on a situation. You are a sad, but disgusting, creature.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

Liz Cheney says hi.

Liz Cheney is surrounded by a security detail after death threats over her Trump criticism: NYT

GOP Rep. Liz Cheney's events in Wyoming have not been widely publicized in advance for security reasons, The New York Times reported.

www.businessinsider.com

Behavior like this is deplorable and should be universally condemned. But unfortunately, dishonest people with political axes to grind will try to insist that it only happens on one side.

It should be condemned from both sides and Sen. Sinema SHOULD have had security and hopefully SS will be assigned to her and Senator Manchin.

 

[MrSquished]

Most of the 1% ARE Democrats Moonie.

Incorrect.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

You are just incapable of posting anything with an honest take on a situation. You are a sad, but disgusting, creature.

You said something stupid " pals around with her business community donors , queen" and i was happy to point out your hyperbole. You are welcome.

 

[VW MAN]

Most of the 1% ARE Democrats Moonie.

Source or shut the fuck up liar!

 

[MrSquished]

You said something stupid " pals around with her business community donors , queen" and i was happy to point out your hyperbole. You are welcome.

I know the state of politics there. I won't waste my time linking articles and snipping appropriate quotes from them to prove my point to you. It's a waste of time though, to a dishonest reactionary shite like you. You dismiss reality to live in your own fucked up world, just like the majority of the regressive GQP these days.

 

[MrSquished]

Source or shut the fuck up liar!

I posted an article about this myth recently. It won't have any effect on pathologically lying shite GQP'ers though.

 

[Vic]

It should be condemned from both sides and Sen. Sinema SHOULD have had security and hopefully SS will be assigned to her and Senator Manchin.

Except that you always ignore, apologize for, or just flat out lie about it, whenever right-wing extremists do something that deserves condemnation. Like how you just ignored that Cheney required security due to death threats from right-wingers. My guess is that you genuinely believe you do no wrong.

 

[Vic]

Most of the 1% ARE Democrats Moonie.

Don't do drugs, kids.

 

[cytg111]

Where she probably called security to remove the criminals from the building.

If you ever were in doubt about Sinema, watching Taj defend her should remove all doubt.

 

[Vic]

If you ever were in doubt about Sinema, watching Taj defend her should remove all doubt.

Dude... unless you actually want AZ to flip back red, don't fall for the trolling. Seriously.

Dems are the big tent coalition party. GOP is the no-RINOs/MAGAs-only party.

 

[emperus]

Not necessary and over aggressive. But the more I hear bout Sinema, the more I dislike her. How does she have time to be teaching or taking a paid internship gig in a winery. She is 1 of a group of the 100 most important people in the world. I would assume her day job would/should consume most/all of her time.

 

[emperus]

Dude... unless you actually want AZ to flip back red, don't fall for the trolling. Seriously.

Dems are the big tent coalition party. GOP is the no-RINOs/MAGAs-only party.

Nah, she needs to be primaried. Don't know much about Arizona, but if her former self could win Arizona, I don't see why another Liberal couldn't.

She wants to be a maverick like McCain, but it only worked for McCain, because the rest of his party was crazy, so him mavericky side was just being normal. Like his vote against the health care bill. He got too much credit for not being a crazy Republican. It's like saying Pence deserves credit for not throwing the election to Trump. He deserves credit for not doing the absolutely crazy thing he had no power to do and stealing the election? Right.

 

[pmv]

Don't they realise it's illegal to video tape a cinema?

https://www.cinemauk.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/fact-anti-camcording-best-practice-guide-2014.pdf

 

[MrSquished]

Nah, she needs to be primaried. Don't know much about Arizona, but if her former self could win Arizona, I don't see why another Liberal couldn't.

She wants to be a maverick like McCain, but it only worked for McCain, because the rest of his party was crazy, so him mavericky side was just being normal. Like his vote against the health care bill. He got too much credit for not being a crazy Republican. It's like saying Pence deserves credit for not throwing the election to Trump. He deserves credit for not doing the absolutely crazy thing? Right.

I read an analysis on comparing her to McCain, and it broke down the numbers - he voted with his party more than Sinema to hers.

 

[blackangst1]

Source or shut the fuck up liar!

Depends on how you define it.

Which Party Is the Party of the 1 Percent? - Capital Research Center

• Top 300 zip codes nationwide (representing the top 1.4 percent of socio-economic status):

Democrats $71 million
Republicans $47 million
(60 percent Democratic)

• Big Four metropolitan areas’ zip codes in top 5 percent by socio-economic status:

Democrats $77 million
Republicans $42 million
(65 percent Democratic)

• Big Four central-city zip codes in top 5 percent of socio-economic status:

Democrats $48 million
Republicans $21 million
(70 percent Democratic)


Overall? Theyre about even.

edit: second source: PolitiFact | How many billionaires support the Democratic vs. Republican parties?

 

[Vic]

Depends on how you define it.

Which Party Is the Party of the 1 Percent? - Capital Research Center

• Top 300 zip codes nationwide (representing the top 1.4 percent of socio-economic status):

Democrats $71 million
Republicans $47 million
(60 percent Democratic)

• Big Four metropolitan areas’ zip codes in top 5 percent by socio-economic status:

Democrats $77 million
Republicans $42 million
(65 percent Democratic)

• Big Four central-city zip codes in top 5 percent of socio-economic status:

Democrats $48 million
Republicans $21 million
(70 percent Democratic)


Overall? Theyre about even.

edit: second source: PolitiFact | How many billionaires support the Democratic vs. Republican parties?

I don't see the problem here. The real difference between Democrats and Republicans isn't economic, but whether or not one believes the proposition that all persons are created equal is the founding principle of our great nation, or "cultural marxism."
It's whether or not one believes immigration is part of the great melting pot, or the great replacement.
And as bigotry and exclusion are inherently bad for business, should it be any surprise if Republican billionaires are less successful than their Democratic counterparts?

Edit: also, you cherrypicked your statistics.. again.

 

[blackangst1]

I don't see the problem here. The real difference between Democrats and Republicans isn't economic, but whether or not one believes the proposition that all persons are created equal is the founding principle of our great nation, or "cultural marxism."
It's whether or not one believes immigration is part of the great melting pot, or the great replacement.
And as bigotry and exclusion are inherently bad for business, should it be any surprise if Republican billionaires are less successful than their Democratic counterparts?

Edit: also, you cherrypicked your statistics.. again.

I agree. And I cherrypicked nothing. Got a problem with the info? Squabble with the studies and reports listed as sources.

 

[Vic]

I agree. And I cherrypicked nothing. Got a problem with the info? Squabble with the studies and reports listed as sources.

Pulling data only from major metro areas is blatant cherrypicking.

 

[blackangst1]

Pulling data only from major metro areas is blatant cherrypicking.

mmmkay. If anything its slanted towards Democrats, since larger metropolitan areas are left leaning. Its also where where the wealthy live.

Maybe you can provide better sources?

edit: Also, to keep you on track, the subject I was replying to America's wealthy. The top 1%. Which both of the sources I provided reference.

 

[MrSquished]

Pulling data only from major metro areas is blatant cherrypicking.

I'll have to find the article I read but it said the split leans Republican by a bit. Not a ton, but it does. There are some high profile billionaires that lean D like Buffet and Soros, but they are outliers. Of the richest American families, they distinctly lean R. Also based on income levels, once you get to the really rich, they lean R.

 

[HomerJS]

FBI Allegedly Played ‘Larger Role’ In Whitmer Kidnapping Plot Than Previously Known, According To Report

The FBI apparently played a much

dailycaller.com

Here's one.

Men accused in plot to kidnap Michigan Gov. Whitmer claim FBI set them up

The men accused of plotting to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer last September claim they were set up by the FBI because of their conservative political views.

nypost.com

"There were at least 12 FBI informants involved in the investigation to thwart the alleged scheme by a militia group known as the “Wolverine Watchmen” — but the agents actually took an active part in it right from its inception, according to court filings, evidence and dozens of interviews reviewed by BuzzFeed News "


Now give me a link to "Besides you are fine with it if people of color are killed. "

or admit it's hyperbole and a lie.

As for the latter your post history betrays you.

As for the former I was referring to Jan 6. Now if you want to talk about Trumpers trying to kidnap Whitmer it's old news the FBI was embedded. One of them already told his story. Redneck Trumpers are trying to claim the FBI gave them the idea which is nonsense.

I guess the FBI gave them the idea to storm the capital, stop a constitutional process, try to kill and kidnap Democrats along with attacking police.

FBI did all of that? Deplorables are threatening the lives of school board members, too. I guess the FBI gave them that idea?

Really, Skippy? You are dumber then we think you are.

 

[MrSquished]

Here is an article on America's richest families - strongly lean R

Are America's Richest Families Republicans or Democrats?

Forbes took at look at the 50 richest clans on our new list of America’s Richest Families. There are a handful of politicians in the mix, and an overwhelming majority that support one political party far more than another.

www.forbes.com

An article on the wealthiest in general - they lean R

U.S. "1%" Is More Republican, but Not More Conservative

The wealthiest 1% of Americans -- those in households earning $500,000 or more annually -- lean more Republican than the rest of the public, 57% vs. 44%, but are mainstream in their basic ideology. The greatest difference between the wealthiest 1% and everyone else, however, is education.

news.gallup.com

Anyways, the point is, Taj saying the top 1% are mostly D, is full of shit, as is mostly everything he says. He is a standard GQP'er these days, spouting misinformation and nonsense. The enemy today is misinformation and misinformation is the foundation of today's so-called conservatism. Know the enemy.

 

[woolfe9998]

Here is an article on America's richest families - strongly lean R

Are America's Richest Families Republicans or Democrats?

Forbes took at look at the 50 richest clans on our new list of America’s Richest Families. There are a handful of politicians in the mix, and an overwhelming majority that support one political party far more than another.

www.forbes.com

An article on the wealthiest in general - they lean R

U.S. "1%" Is More Republican, but Not More Conservative

The wealthiest 1% of Americans -- those in households earning $500,000 or more annually -- lean more Republican than the rest of the public, 57% vs. 44%, but are mainstream in their basic ideology. The greatest difference between the wealthiest 1% and everyone else, however, is education.

news.gallup.com

Anyways, the point is, Taj saying the top 1% are mostly D, is full of shit, as is mostly everything he says. He is a standard GQP'er these days, spouting misinformation and nonsense. The enemy today is misinformation and misinformation is the foundation of today's so-called conservatism. Know the enemy.

That second headline is telling. Wealthiest 1% are more republican but not more conservative. Because regardless of their personal political views, they know which party is buttering their bread.