• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Sea Shepards ram Japanese whaling ship

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Perk, I suppose Sumguy is trolling too?

BTW he got the quote before you went and added your 'humorous riff on language' to the post.

And you proved my point about the MOD call out.

The second i reference your position as a MOD it is a call out and I must cut it out or something bad will happen.

But you can throw around your title all you want, as you did with the "forum quality manager" and nothing comes of it.

And BTW no one even brought up your status as a MOD until you injected it into the debate.If you don't want people to "troll me as a mod" then perhaps you should leave your title out of it and behave like everyone else in this thread does.
 
What the Japanese are doing is immoral.

What the Shepard people are doing is illegal.

That is all you need to know.
 
Originally posted by: Perknose
Dude. You "harvest" wheat. You hunt and then kill whales. Your use of weasel words says volumes.
Ehh...harvest is a standard term used in agro/fishery/wildlife sciences, whether animals or plants. e.g.

http://www.azgfd.gov/w_c/elk_harvest.shtml

http://www.rockymountainnews.c...ers-down-dow-believes/

http://www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/land/wildlife/HUNT/deer/

http://www.wvu.edu/~agexten/wildlife/deer.pdf

http://mdc.mo.gov/hunt/harvest/index.php?animal=deer

http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Salmon-Harvest-Hatcheries/

http://www.habitat.adfg.state..../projsumm/adfgclam.htm


The only people who would object to the eminently neutral if not scientific term are those with a touchy-feely emotional attachment to the animal and want to hump them. I'm sure somewhere there are people who want to have an intimate personal relationship with corn on the cob, too.

And you still haven't posted one single link to support your assertions, even though I asked. Why?
Because it might involve articles that show photos of whales or something. I wouldn't want you to break down and cry, being that you're so non-emotional about this and all.


Originally posted by: ProfJohn
What the Japanese are doing is immoral.

What the Shepard people are doing is illegal.

That is all you need to know.
The Japanese are immoral for preferring ocean cows rather than those that live on land? So...you're vegan, eh?
 
Originally posted by: tcsenter
Originally posted by: Perknose
Dude. You "harvest" wheat. You hunt and then kill whales. Your use of weasel words says volumes.
Ehh...harvest is a standard term used in agro/fishery/wildlife sciences, whether animals or plants. e.g.

http://www.azgfd.gov/w_c/elk_harvest.shtml

http://www.rockymountainnews.c...ers-down-dow-believes/

http://www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/land/wildlife/HUNT/deer/

http://www.wvu.edu/~agexten/wildlife/deer.pdf

http://mdc.mo.gov/hunt/harvest/index.php?animal=deer

http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Salmon...on-Fishery-Management/

http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Salmon-Harvest-Hatcheries/


The only people who would object to the eminently neutral if not scientific term are those with a touchy-feely emotional attachment to the animal and want to hump them. I'm sure somewhere there are people who want to have an intimate personal relationship with corn on the cob, too.

And you still haven't posted one single link to support your assertions, even though I asked. Why?
Because it might involve articles that show photos of whales or something. I wouldn't want you to break down and cry, being that you're so non-emotional about this and all.

Nice try. I happen to agree with the folks who see holes in the both sides' game.

Arrrrrgggggghhhhhhh, matey, your rhetoric smells like stale whale.

Edit: And, yeah, "harvest" is a convenient and oft-used euphemism. Our modern world is awash with convenient euphemisms -- "collateral damage" . . . or "medical loses", the term insurance companies use when they actually have to pay one of their client's bills.

"Harvest" is still a weasel word for hunting and killing whales. Try not to get too emotional about that all too obvious fact.
 
For the record:
Fin whales, like the only in the video, are considered endangered.

Ummm.... wait... I think the whale in that video is a Minke Whale which is not endangered at all.

There are between 300,000 and 600,000 Minke whales in Southern Hemisphere alone and another 100,000 in the northern.
 
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
For the record:
Fin whales, like the only in the video, are considered endangered.

Ummm.... wait... I think the whale in that video is a Minke Whale which is not endangered at all.

There are between 300,000 and 600,000 Minke whales in Southern Hemisphere alone and another 100,000 in the northern.

Lol, well played, sir! :laugh:
 
meh.
If they're not hunting endangered species of whales, then the japanese have every right to continue harvesting whale meat for food as long as we slaughter cattle for beef.
 
If they want to use the meat for food, that's one thing but from what I understand, whale meat isn't very popular at all. Seems more of a keeping the tradition alive thing.
 
To me this title is about as interesting as "Brad dumps Angelina."

OMGWTFBBQ, eco extremists don't like whalers?!?! Whodathunkit?

Stop giving free publicity to that stupid show.
 
Originally posted by: marincounty
I'm impressed by these freaks willing to put their own lives on the line for what they believe in. They are volunteers, the japanese whalers are just doing a job for money.

You can call them hippies, but they have more balls than most of the keyboard commandos posting here, myself included.

And defending nature against assholes is a fine undertaking, imho.

:thumbsup:

 
Originally posted by: ADDAvenger
To me this title is about as interesting as "Brad dumps Angelina."

OMGWTFBBQ, eco extremists don't like whalers?!?! Whodathunkit?

Stop giving free publicity to that stupid show.

😕 Yet you read and responded to the thread.
 
Originally posted by: manowar821
Whalers need to DIAF. I don't understand why you mouth-breathers defend them or act offended. Fucking morons.

I'm sure the average whaler isn't concerned with anything beyond making a living, and will continue to do it as long as it is legal.
 
Originally posted by: ADDAvenger
To me this title is about as interesting as "Brad dumps Angelina."

OMGWTFBBQ, eco extremists don't like whalers?!?! Whodathunkit?

Stop giving free publicity to that stupid show.

It is a nearly unwatchable show for Captain Captain and his unmerry band of earnest shipboard dweebs.

Still, you kinda' have to give it to them that they're standing up and taking action for something they believe in, righting the wrong of a rogue nation blatantly using a cynical loophole to circumvent a treaty it signed in supposedly good faith.

Isn't that exactly the argument oft made here for the Second Amendment, to preserve the tools for citizens to bring even their own government to heel if it acts either immorally or illegally?

Just sayin'. ;shrug:
 
Originally posted by: RedSquirrel
Ha nice! Now if they can just do the exact same thing to those seal hunters that slaughter millions of baby seals every year in a blood bath operation.

Personally I would of took it from a different angle though, that angle was not really an effective hit. Perpendicular, closer to the front, probably would have done a better job.

i would have guessed they were trying to nail the prop.

and a perpendicular hit is hard as hell to make on the ocean. it's far eaiser to do it like this, and potentially capsize their boat, rather than perpendicular to crush their hull.
 
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: ADDAvenger
To me this title is about as interesting as "Brad dumps Angelina."

OMGWTFBBQ, eco extremists don't like whalers?!?! Whodathunkit?

Stop giving free publicity to that stupid show.

It is a nearly unwatchable show for Captain Captain and his unmerry band of earnest shipboard dweebs.

Still, you kinda' have to give it to them that they're standing up and taking action for something they believe in, righting the wrong of a rogue nation blatantly using a cynical loophole to circumvent a treaty it signed in supposedly good faith.

Isn't that exactly the argument oft made here for the Second Amendment, to preserve the tools for citizens to bring even their own government to heel if it acts either immorally or illegally?

Just sayin'. ;shrug:

Meh, I watch it for its humorous aspects (of which there are many).

Like how they spent an episode or two shitting themselves over the LRAD, and how much they dramatized it. "OH NO! Loud noises!" Turns out it was just an annoyance. I especially liked how they had to resort to flinging the bottles of the rancid smelling oil from, basically, a dinghy due to some new laws. Knowing how tall the ships probably are, thats a fail.
 
Originally posted by: Fayd
Originally posted by: RedSquirrel
Ha nice! Now if they can just do the exact same thing to those seal hunters that slaughter millions of baby seals every year in a blood bath operation.

Personally I would of took it from a different angle though, that angle was not really an effective hit. Perpendicular, closer to the front, probably would have done a better job.

i would have guessed they were trying to nail the prop.

and a perpendicular hit is hard as hell to make on the ocean. it's far eaiser to do it like this, and potentially capsize their boat, rather than perpendicular to crush their hull.
I doubt the goal was to damage the ship as much as it was to knock the whale they were bringing on board loose.
 
Originally posted by: Perknose
Still, you kinda' have to give it to them that they're standing up and taking action for something they believe in, righting the wrong of a rogue nation blatantly using a cynical loophole to circumvent a treaty it signed in supposedly good faith.
Japan initially filed formal reservations to the ICW moratorium, which as a matter of international law, would have excluded it from the moratorium just as Norway is. Japan withdrew its reservation only under fierce political pressure and threats by the United States and other countries to deny Japan access to important fishing territories.

I will note that the stated purpose of the ICW was to "provide for the proper conservation of whale stocks and thus make possible the orderly development of the whaling industry". IOW, its an industry organization whose purpose was to study and regulate the commercial harvesting of whales with the ultimate goal being sustainability, not out-right bans. However, it is indisputable that anti-whaling countries whose populations did not prefer whale products came to dominate control of the ICW and turned it into an anti-whaling advocacy group.

It would be like creating a commission to regulate the salmon industry for sustainability then stacking it with PETA nutwhacks and vegans.

"Oh, salmon are just so beautiful and majestic! God I want to hump one!" :roll:
 
I'm not saying anything for or against the whalers or the eco extremists (in fact I intentionally used the meanest label I could think of for both of them 😛); what I'm saying is that this is over-dramatized and is not worthy of all the attention and hernias. Not only that, this whole drama is old news to everyone and it seems pointless to go over it all again.

I mean jeeze people, is this what P&N is like?
 
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Don't we have an international mariners court to solve problems like this?

Perhaps we should treat the people piloting the Sea Shepard as pirates and arrest them and throw them in jail.

BTW the Japanese shouldn't be whaling, but that does not excuse the behavior of this dutch ship.

sort of like the UN...a paper tiger...rofl
 
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: edro
I have never understood why ships cannot carry weapons.

I semi-auto rifle would have prevented that easily enough.

The Japanese ships do carry guns. After they harpoon the whale, they bring the whale up to the bow of the ship and they proceed to shoot into the whale's head until it eventually dies. Sometimes it takes dozens of shots.

Nice and humane way to carry out research. Too bad the Steve Irwin wasn't able to sink the Japanese harpoon ship.

I bet you have a link to back up your assertion????
Plus......the fuckin whale has been harpooned....most likely lethal in its own right....
 
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: edro
I have never understood why ships cannot carry weapons.

I semi-auto rifle would have prevented that easily enough.

The Japanese ships do carry guns. After they harpoon the whale, they bring the whale up to the bow of the ship and they proceed to shoot into the whale's head until it eventually dies. Sometimes it takes dozens of shots.

Nice and humane way to carry out research. Too bad the Steve Irwin wasn't able to sink the Japanese harpoon ship.

I bet you have a link to back up your assertion????
Plus......the fuckin whale has been harpooned....most likely lethal in its own right....

Actually, the Capt and others have provided video which shows doing exactly that.
 
Originally posted by: ADDAvenger
I mean jeeze people, is this what P&N is like?

It's exactly what P&N is like . . . although P&N is even worse, if you can believe that.
 
Back
Top