IronWing
No Lifer
- Jul 20, 2001
- 72,878
- 33,954
- 136
Guys, look at the pic in the OP. The dude is wearing a tie and has Republican hair: he's innocent. Quit picking on Kyle.
Guys, look at the pic in the OP. The dude is wearing a tie and has Republican hair: he's innocent. Quit picking on Kyle.
That's about as fair and balanced as I expected to see here.Non-political? Ok.
Inbred illegally aquires an AR-15, goes to a peace rally in another state, kills 2, cripples one. Heads across the state line like he was in an old western. Gets busted, sent back, and set free by the Klan and Neo-nazis.
I knew the MyPillow guy was Trump's bitch, but I was a little shocked that Ricky Schroder was involved.
He didn't seem the type.
Then obviously the DA and the judge fucked up.It's pretty obvious the bail was set high enough to make sure he WOULDN'T make bail.
1. He is a flight risk. He had to be extradited.
2. Giving someone that murders on video bail, would be like giving OJ bail after the Bronco slow speed chase.. (OJ DIDN'T get bail.
3. It's a perversion of the system to allow Klansmen to post the bail for someone that's not even related to them.
Would you be cool with cartels posting bail for drug dealers?
Be interesting to see how
I'd be down with that as long as the trial was held within two weeks. The idea that the state can simply hold you in perpetuity while they dick around is punishment without conviction.
The turdblossom is doing *endorsements* now. Very cool. Very normal.
Clearly it's a problem, but how can we justify keeping someone jailed for months or even years as the trial drags on?
That's about as fair and balanced as I expected to see here.
I'll be very interested to see how this one plays out. It looks to me like stupid met a couple of stupid's and only one stupid walked away. Such a sad waste of life.
Yup. The weapon was illegally aquired.Even though it was the Reader's Digest condensed version, it was completely accurate.
Rittenhouse DID illegally acquire the rifle.
He was at a rally in a state that he did not reside in.
He DID head back across the state line in order to escape culpability. (The only time I've seen that work, was an old cowboy movies.)
They did go back and return him to face his crimes.
Had it not been for the racists and neo-Nazi groups to raise the money, (by the way, that was $2 million CASH bail. No bail bondsman needed.) His little ass would still be getting pounded in jail.
Yup. The weapon was illegally aquired.
That he didn't reside in the state where the rioting occurred is irrelevant.
The wiki article states that he spoke to police after the shooting.
Yes, he did return to his home across the state line.
I don't care who posted his bail, it's irrelevant.
What's relevant are the events leading up to the shooting, and why the fellow was there with a rifle. The event as described in the wiki article isn't cut and dried.
Your version of the event is hate based, it's empty posturing designed to produce an emotional conviction. I'll wait and see what they jury has to say.
Yup. The weapon was illegally aquired.
That he didn't reside in the state where the rioting occurred is irrelevant.
The wiki article states that he spoke to police after the shooting.
Yes, he did return to his home across the state line.
I don't care who posted his bail, it's irrelevant.
What's relevant are the events leading up to the shooting, and why the fellow was there with a rifle. The event as described in the wiki article isn't cut and dried.
Your version of the event is hate based, it's empty posturing designed to produce an emotional conviction. I'll wait and see what they jury has to say.
agreed. And that's pretty much what happens with a lot of black youth in this country.
![]()
Before the Law
Kalief Browder was accused of taking a backpack. The courts took the next three years of his life.www.newyorker.com
^probably the most famous of such egregious examples.
held in Rikers for 3 years, allegedly stealing a backpack, never saw a trial.
but really it's their fault for not having bootstraps, though.
agreed. And that's pretty much what happens with a lot of black youth in this country.
![]()
Before the Law
Kalief Browder was accused of taking a backpack. The courts took the next three years of his life.www.newyorker.com
^probably the most famous of such egregious examples.
held in Rikers for 3 years, allegedly stealing a backpack, never saw a trial.
but really it's their fault for not having bootstraps, though.
Isn't this the kid who was punched and or hit with a skateboard before opening fire?
If so... I'm actually surprised with how many people seem to forget that. Politics must make you forget facts. He will walk and rightfully so.... Unless the jury is like some of you anandtechers.
Yet it's ok when antifa goes across state lines and hits people with skateboards that's ok of course. At least be consistent with your gobbygook.
The mob trying to kill him aren't victims.Too bad his victims won't get a jury.
Even though it was the Reader's Digest condensed version, it was completely accurate.
Rittenhouse DID illegally acquire the rifle.
He was at a rally in a state that he did not reside in.
He DID head back across the state line in order to escape culpability. (The only time I've seen that work, was an old cowboy movies.)
They did go back and return him to face his crimes.
Had it not been for the racists and neo-Nazi groups to raise the money, (by the way, that was $2 million CASH bail. No bail bondsman needed.) His little ass would still be getting pounded in jail.
I never goto a protest without an ar-15
He was there to kill people and he did. There was no other reason for him to go there.That's a new one. Are you claiming he was protesting?
Got any evidence for that?
The info I have suggests he was there as a "medic" and or "security". Don't know why he wasn't with a group for protection - but he clearly didn't know how violent and blood thirsty the actual "protestors" were on the streets.
I never goto a protest without an ar-15