Screw the UN

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
ElFenix

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,407
8,595
126
a year? they should try a month.

or next week. hows tuesday? what a crock.
 
B

BigJelly

Golden Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,717
0
0
What do you mean the UN is making steps to be irrelevent...
they already are!!!

This isn't a joke, it's actually quite sad.

The US is the only thing that has any moral and justice in the world, the UN is just become to Anti-American and useless. I almost wish England, Germany, Canada, Italy, Russia,... would get attacked. Maybe that way the greedy self centered nations actually do something.

The way i figure it the US should drop out of the UN (realize the UN stopped us from getting rid of sadam the first time), all we do is give and all the UN does is take. Moreover, next time there is a natural disaster in the world, I say the US shouldn't help them, I say F-them because the rest of the world says F-us.
 
ElFenix

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,407
8,595
126
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: ElFenix
a year? they should try a month.

or next week. hows tuesday? what a crock.
Click to expand...

Tommorow would be better.
Click to expand...

couldn't assemble and transport a competent team by then.

but if iraq doesn't have everything hidden extremely well in a year they're stupid.
 
T

ToBeMe

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2000
5,711
0
0
This is gonna' go over like a lead balloon........................
rolleye.gif
 
J

JellyBaby

Diamond Member
Apr 21, 2000
9,159
1
81
Look on the bright side: this might allow our War Mongering administration to lower its blood pressure to its peacetime normal of 225/90. And get back to hunting al queda...remember, the bastards who hit us?

Seems overly lengthy and I wouldn't believe it would take that long to get started. After all, they've been over this sand dune before.
 
C

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: JellyBaby
Look on the bright side: this might allow our War Mongering administration to lower its blood pressure to its peacetime normal of 225/90. And get back to hunting al queda...remember, the bastards who hit us?

Seems overly lengthy and I wouldn't believe it would take that long to get started. After all, they've been over this sand dune before.
Click to expand...

We continue to hunt down Al queda in afganistan and pakistan. Special ops are heading out to Yeman. Oh and iraq is sheltering Al queda members. Next.
 
S

StattlichPassat

Banned
Jan 9, 2002
5,232
0
0
"Let's get one thing straight from the outset: The U.N. sucks. And before you start talking about the starving babies it saves and the thorns it pulls from cuddly creatures' paws, please remember that all sorts of awful institutions do good things. Hamas funds hospitals, Hitler built highways, Stalin improved literacy, Baywatch helped people with tired blood by providing uplifting, and uplifted, torsos to look at. One can be in favor of many of the things the U.N. does without being in favor of the U.N., just as being in favor of regular garbage collection doesn't mean I have to be in favor of the government collecting garbage. If the government stopped picking up my trash, that wouldn't mean my home would be swallowed up in bags of filth. And, if the U.N. stopped feeding starving people that would hardly mean starving people would never be fed."

Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online- "The U.N. sucks."
 
B

BigJelly

Golden Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,717
0
0
Originally posted by: jjsole
So whats the rush? He didn't fly a plane into the world trade center.
Click to expand...

No sadam is violating the treaty HE signed!
That treaty cost 299 American lives. So by not enforcing the treaty, you are saying those 299 brave men died for nothing.
Moreover, he killed over 1 million of his own people. And don't tell me the sanctions did, because the sanctions do not include food. He killed them by poison gas-to you retards that's a weapon of mass destruction. Something he should be shot and killed for--violating a treaty and mass murder. So don't give me this "what dod he do" BS. The real question is what didn't he do.
 
A

Aceshigh

Platinum Member
Aug 22, 2002
2,529
1
0
Originally posted by: jjsole
So whats the rush? He didn't fly a plane into the world trade center.
Click to expand...


No, but in less than a year he could have the capability to do much more than that with a nuclear weapon.
 
J

JellyBaby

Diamond Member
Apr 21, 2000
9,159
1
81
Oh and iraq is sheltering Al queda members.
Click to expand...
All I've seen is allegations people associated with al qaeda may be, or have traveled through, the country. You would engage in a costly war with Iraq based on that imperfect knowledge? So eager to widen the conflict are we?

Why make another enemy and expand the battle to a dubious front, when we have plenty already and still haven't cleaned up in Afghanistan and the others?
 
B

BigJelly

Golden Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,717
0
0
How to solve the UN problem...

It's very simple, all Bush has to do is say fine i'll agree to the UN horsesh!t on one condition. The condition is if the US is attacked by the weapons of mass destruction, we will do 10 fold on every UN member.

I'm not joking, the problem with the UN is that it's other members won't be attacked just the US. But if they were attacked they'd attack without hesitation; thus, they are now in danger--not by the US but by terrorism.

They love to be nice and buracratic when their @ss isn't on the line but when ours is they couldn't give a sh!t. So i say F the League of Nations, I mean UN.
 
R

rufruf44

Platinum Member
May 8, 2001
2,002
0
0
Does anyone here realize that the UN is not supposed to be a tool for the US? It stands for the United Nation for crying out loud. US hold a very strong position as a permanent member of the security council but we still can get outvoted easily in it too. If most of the member doesn't want US to attack Iraq, then UN should abide to the majority. Now whether US will comply or not to the UN resolution is not anyone bussiness but the US, as well as all the consequences associated with such act.
Personally, I think Saddam should just be silenced quietly by a special ops group. Much cleaner, cheaper and eliminate any political bartering back and forth.
 
C

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: JellyBaby
Oh and iraq is sheltering Al queda members.
Click to expand...
All I've seen is allegations people associated with al qaeda may be, or have traveled through, the country. You would engage in a costly war with Iraq based on that imperfect knowledge? So eager to widen the conflict are we?

Why make another enemy and expand the battle to a dubious front, when we have plenty already and still haven't cleaned up in Afghanistan and the others?
Click to expand...


Is it a huge stretch to think that Iraq is sheltering Al queda members? Do you think we do not have agents in iraq right now? Do you think this is all just a whim of the president?
 
C

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: rufruf44
Does anyone here realize that the UN is not supposed to be a tool for the US? It stands for the United Nation for crying out loud. US hold a very strong position as a permanent member of the security council but we still can get outvoted easily in it too. If most of the member doesn't want US to attack Iraq, then UN should abide to the majority. Now whether US will comply or not to the UN resolution is not anyone bussiness but the US, as well as all the consequences associated with such act.
Personally, I think Saddam should just be silenced quietly by a special ops group. Much cleaner, cheaper and eliminate any political bartering back and forth.
Click to expand...

He has survived many assination attempts over the past 11 years. If Hussein thinks you are the slight bit disloyal, you are dead.
 
B

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
Is it a huge stretch to think that Iraq is sheltering Al queda members? Do you think we do not have agents in iraq right now? Do you think this is all just a whim of the president?
Click to expand...
Sure but we KNOW there were Al Qaeda members in northern Iraq. We could have snatched them and been justified. Clearly another agenda is at hand. I don't think this is a whim of the president but it does not engender my confidence when international cooperation with reigning in an international offender is called a hinderance.
 
C

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Is it a huge stretch to think that Iraq is sheltering Al queda members? Do you think we do not have agents in iraq right now? Do you think this is all just a whim of the president?
Click to expand...
Sure but we KNOW there were Al Qaeda members in northern Iraq. We could have snatched them and been justified. Clearly another agenda is at hand. I don't think this is a whim of the president but it does not engender my confidence when international cooperation with reigning in an international offender is called a hinderance.
Click to expand...


We could do that, but if they are going to have safe harbor there, ther real problem needs to be taken care off.
And what happens when Hussein passes a nuke to those Al queda in iraq? Outlook not good.

 
M

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,926
6,793
126
I don't care how many people have to die, I must feel safe. I can't live with the thought that a nuke may go off in my city. Please please make the fear stop. Kill everybody. Kill them now.
 
UDT89

UDT89

Diamond Member
Jul 31, 2001
4,529
0
76
UN+NECESSARY= Unnecessary.



Where did this new found love for Iraq come from in the world?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom