• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Scott Peterson Trial Verdict Reached...He's Guilty of Murder 1!!!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
As much as I believe he did it, I don't think he should have been convicted. They had more real evidence in the OJ trial and OJ got off. I honestly don't think the state proved it's case beyond a reasonable doubt.

<---Criminal Justice degree.
 
Originally posted by: bunker
As much as I believe he did it, I don't think he should have been convicted. They had more real evidence in the OJ trial and OJ got off. I honestly don't think the state proved it's case beyond a reasonable doubt.

<---Criminal Justice degree.

I agree 100%.... here is a cut &amp; paste from the other thread:
I am kinda disappointed...

I mean... in my heart, I tihnk he did it... but legally....

There was no cause of death
There was no murder weapon
There was no phyiscal evidence tying Scott to the murder

And if that is not bad enough...

The judge allowed them to get in the boat and jump up and down ..during deliberation!!! That is not allowed and will DEFINATELY be a cause for appeal. And it seems to me... that every time they had a juror that did not tow the guilty line.... they replaced him.

I know I will probably be flamed for saying this... but if I were to follow the letter of the law, I do not think the State proved it's case beyone a reasonable doubt.

🙂



 
Back
Top