According to suspicious fox news claims, a transgender boy has been accused of entering a girl’s bathroom while wearing a skirt and raping a girl via anal and forced oral. The father of the girl told the police directly about the incident. A few weeks later at a school board meeting, the superintendent made a claim that the named boy does not even exist in the victim’s school and that the school never had, and never recorded such a rape incident. Some other parents who also attended the school board meeting also shared the opinion that the boy in question was innocent. It was at that moment the girl’s father got into an enraged fit and started throwing a tantrum that led to his arrest.
Between the time of this school board meeting and the next, the police made a public claim that there had been another rape in the county school system between a boy and a girl in a classroom. Apparently, the alleged victim in the second rape incident, when giving the name of the rapists to the authorities, gave a first and last name that was same to that of the accused in the first incident. The second rape occurred in a totally different school in the county.
The first incident school claimed that they had already transferred the accused boy to another school in the county, "for his own and others protection" after the incident the father of the alleged victim caused at the school board meeting. The school also claimed that they will not publicly disclose that name of the school the transgender boy was transferred to. The first victim’s father's lawyer however, without knowing which school the boy was transferred to, made the claim that it was and had to be the same boy. The police eventually arrested the boy after two months of investigation, after the alleged first incident (the same month of the second incident).
In the second school board meeting where a vote was to be held, whether to remove the superintendent from his duties, the first victim’s father received a letter in the mail that claimed he was not invited and prohibited from attending the event or voting in the vote. The vote eventually turned out to be against the superintendent at the meeting.
The county court system claims they will put the boy on trial for both cases on the same day, to make the process easy. The alleged first victim's father and lawyer claim they will try to prove the boy guilty. If found guilty, other than just the sentence the boy will have to face, the boy will also have to register to the state's sex offender list. The article makes the claim that the accused boy's parents did not want to comment or talk with Fox.
The article also makes a bold claim at multiple points in it, where it says the incidents occurred after the schools renovated their men’s and women’s bathroom to be trans friendly.
Other than what is the article, the comment section is not surprising, if one were to consider the type of audience Fox News caters to. There are five types of people in the comment section, the majority of which say the replacement was needed. Others say that they should get the name of the rapist, school board members, and ex-superintendent, and claim they will end up having a terrible accident. Another group states that if it were their girl, they claim that the rapist would not wakeup, even if it was a family member. Another group says to burn down the school board, school, and the house of the rapist. The last and the smallest group are Democrats trying to protect the truth.
My take on this story… this incident and timeline is all over the place. Not even sure who to believe, the father or the boy. How do events and timelines like this even occur? First off, the boy was transgender, not to say a transgender cannot be a rapist, but it is very unlikely that they committed rape. Furthermore, I do not even know what the court is going to work of from to find the boy guilty. How could the boy be arrested when a county school board superintendent makes a claim that there is no such person in the victim’s school. If there was, why would the superintendent lie? But the biggest thing of all that poses a question is, how does trans friendly bathroom renovations lead to rape, as Fox keeps claiming.
www.foxnews.com
Between the time of this school board meeting and the next, the police made a public claim that there had been another rape in the county school system between a boy and a girl in a classroom. Apparently, the alleged victim in the second rape incident, when giving the name of the rapists to the authorities, gave a first and last name that was same to that of the accused in the first incident. The second rape occurred in a totally different school in the county.
The first incident school claimed that they had already transferred the accused boy to another school in the county, "for his own and others protection" after the incident the father of the alleged victim caused at the school board meeting. The school also claimed that they will not publicly disclose that name of the school the transgender boy was transferred to. The first victim’s father's lawyer however, without knowing which school the boy was transferred to, made the claim that it was and had to be the same boy. The police eventually arrested the boy after two months of investigation, after the alleged first incident (the same month of the second incident).
In the second school board meeting where a vote was to be held, whether to remove the superintendent from his duties, the first victim’s father received a letter in the mail that claimed he was not invited and prohibited from attending the event or voting in the vote. The vote eventually turned out to be against the superintendent at the meeting.
The county court system claims they will put the boy on trial for both cases on the same day, to make the process easy. The alleged first victim's father and lawyer claim they will try to prove the boy guilty. If found guilty, other than just the sentence the boy will have to face, the boy will also have to register to the state's sex offender list. The article makes the claim that the accused boy's parents did not want to comment or talk with Fox.
The article also makes a bold claim at multiple points in it, where it says the incidents occurred after the schools renovated their men’s and women’s bathroom to be trans friendly.
Other than what is the article, the comment section is not surprising, if one were to consider the type of audience Fox News caters to. There are five types of people in the comment section, the majority of which say the replacement was needed. Others say that they should get the name of the rapist, school board members, and ex-superintendent, and claim they will end up having a terrible accident. Another group states that if it were their girl, they claim that the rapist would not wakeup, even if it was a family member. Another group says to burn down the school board, school, and the house of the rapist. The last and the smallest group are Democrats trying to protect the truth.
My take on this story… this incident and timeline is all over the place. Not even sure who to believe, the father or the boy. How do events and timelines like this even occur? First off, the boy was transgender, not to say a transgender cannot be a rapist, but it is very unlikely that they committed rape. Furthermore, I do not even know what the court is going to work of from to find the boy guilty. How could the boy be arrested when a county school board superintendent makes a claim that there is no such person in the victim’s school. If there was, why would the superintendent lie? But the biggest thing of all that poses a question is, how does trans friendly bathroom renovations lead to rape, as Fox keeps claiming.
Loudoun County father arrested at school board event says school tried to cover up daughter's bathroom assault
The father of a student who was assaulted by a gender-fluid individual was arrested in August during a school board meeting at a Virginia school.
Last edited:
Facebook
Twitter