• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

School Board Says Church Can't Visit Students On School Grounds

conjur

No Lifer
http://www.wave3.com/Global/story.asp?S=1650714&nav=0RZEKu8h

(SHEPHERDSVILLE, Ky., February 18th, 2004, 11 a.m.) -- A debate over the separation of church and state had hundreds of people packed into the Bullitt Central High School auditorium Tuesday night to address the school board. So many showed up that more than 400 had to be turned away. Parents and church members wanted to know why ministers are no longer allowed to visit with students on their lunch break. WAVE Investigator Connie Leonard reports.

"Whether we have youth ministers or not, we want to make sure that our youth ministers are allowed to come and speak with the students," said Carol McCullough, a member of the Little Flock Ministry. That was the message at a school board meeting that looked more like a packed Sunday service.

"After 17 years of partnership, we were told it's over," said the Reverend Ronald Shaver of the Little Flock Ministry. He pointed out that youth ministers from his church have been visiting the school during lunch for years to talk, counsel or just listen to students.

"If you're genuinely interested in increasing scores, we want to be a partner, don't close us out," Shaver said.

Church attorneys told the board there is no service or group prayers talking about Jesus, arguing the youth ministers are mentors who just happen to be Christians. One attorney called it "religious discrimination," while another argued that the Constitution and case law clearly indicate "you may not exclude a minister, a rabbi, or anyone else solely because of their religious status."

But, armed with a videotape, the board attorney told the group that a sermon Rev. Shaver recently delivered showed that the visits were all bringing church to school. On the tape, Rev. Shaver says: "There's no reason why I shouldn't be able to go down there, sit down and have lunch with our kids. And if I want to talk about Jesus, there's nothing wrong with it."

School officials say getting federal funds binds schools to abide by federal law, and like it or not, there are no exceptions.

School board officials said they had no intention of changing their minds -- and the crowd made it clear it didn't like that answer.

The school system argues that all groups are excluded during school hours, not just youth ministers. They say if ministers were allowed in, they would be bound to allow any and all other groups the same opportunity. In the meantime, church officials and their attorneys believe their case is equally strong.

 
good for the school, had a mormon church next to my highschool, annoying as f-ck with the visits. Thank god I'm not even in the same county anymore.
 
So let me get this straight, the lawyer says they're not there to preach, but Rev. Shaver says he can if he wants.

This gets right to the heart of why a lot of people don't want church groups involved in public institutions. If you could trust them when they say they're not there to evangelize (which as far as I know you can most of the time), that would be fine, but there's always the fear of something like this.

 
Either the parents can move their kids to another school, or chip in to make up for what will be gone without federal funding. Other than that, the families and church denizens need to stfu.

I'd like to hear what some of the kids had to say, I'm sure more than a few were annoyed at having to listen to a sermon whilst trying to eat lunch, I know I would have been.
 
Even if all of the kids were for it, the guy still should not be preaching in public schools. I'm not sure if he actually has or if he was just quoted as saying it would be okay if he wanted to.

Originally posted by: kage69
Either the parents can move their kids to another school, or chip in to make up for what will be gone without federal funding. Other than that, the families and church denizens need to stfu.

I'd like to hear what some of the kids had to say, I'm sure more than a few were annoyed at having to listen to a sermon whilst trying to eat lunch, I know I would have been.

 
WTF are they even allowed to be able to come in and bug the kids during school hours?? Preaching in school? What if an Iman wanted to come in and preach? Would they be okay with that?
 
Bullitt Central High School
One of my cousin's daughters goes there. She graduates this year. Her sister graduated from BC last year and now attends *coughcough* UofL. I tried, but couldn't dissuade her from making such a horrible decision concerning her collegiate education.

😛
 
Originally posted by: burnedout
Bullitt Central High School
One of my cousin's daughters goes there. She graduates this year. Her sister graduated from BC last year and now attends *coughcough* UofL. I tried, but couldn't dissuade her from making such a horrible decision concerning her collegiate education.

😛

<--- UofL Speed Scientific School alum.


That's it, Mr.     Dueling keyboards at 20 paces!
 
Rev. Shaver says: "There's no reason why I shouldn't be able to go down there, sit down and have lunch with our kids.

Who is he talking about when he says "our kids"? All of the kids or only the kids who actively attend his church?

Does anyone think schools try harder to keep Christians away than they do with any other group?
 
<--- UofL Speed Scientific School alum.


That's it, Mr. Dueling keyboards at 20 paces!
Heh. 😀

You went to Speed? Good stuff! Yeah, jokes and UK/UL rivalry aside, UofL has some excellent programs there on Speed campus.
 
It's tough to tell what the guy's really up to here. It's like "give 'em an inch and they'll take a mile".

It's all well and good for them to come visit "their" kids, except that maybe the real idea is to get "their" kids to bring some of their "doomed to burn in the lake of fire for all eternity" friends along.

If I have to make an assumption one way or the other, it's that the good reverend is really there to evangelize to the unsaved. That may be wrong, but better safe than sorry.

There are way too many in the Christian family that just can't be trusted, and that's what make the heathen unclean like me uneasy.


Originally posted by: dahunan
Rev. Shaver says: "There's no reason why I shouldn't be able to go down there, sit down and have lunch with our kids.

Who is he talking about when he says "our kids"? All of the kids or only the kids who actively attend his church?

Does anyone think schools try harder to keep Christians away than they do with any other group?

 
Originally posted by: koryo
It's tough to tell what the guy's really up to here. It's like "give 'em an inch and they'll take a mile".

It's all well and good for them to come visit "their" kids, except that maybe the real idea is to get "their" kids to bring some of their "doomed to burn in the lake of fire for all eternity" friends along.

If I have to make an assumption one way or the other, it's that the good reverend is really there to evangelize to the unsaved. That may be wrong, but better safe than sorry.

There are way too many in the Christian family that just can't be trusted, and that's what make the heathen unclean like me uneasy.

You and your top-posting...stop it!! 😛


Another thing I just thought of...perhaps this particular church stands to make some monetary gain, too. By getting more people to attend church, they'll get more donations.
 
There are way too many in the Christian family that just can't be trusted, and that's what make the heathen unclean like me uneasy.

Take heart lad, it's actually your heathen-ness that makes you clean!
 
When I went to school, the church(s) were considered a part of the community. Participation by the leaders in school functions was normal.

I can not recall ever of any conversion/preaching ever being done.

The problem is that there are a few zealots on both sides of the fence that have ruined the situation for everyone.

Common sense used to keep the seperation of church and state within the community.
Then the holier than though group felt that they had the directive to convert anywhere and anyhow.
Now there is distrust for anything that smacks of preaching at the taxpayers expense and community policing can not be effective, the legal system is getting involved.
 
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
As the first amendment clearly says the government cannot establish a religion nor can it prohibit it.Nor the freedom of speech.
Clearly by not allowing religious talk in school is prohibiting religion and freedom of speech.The ban in unconstitutional. Period.
 
What if a Satanist cult moved next doors. Would they be allowed to come and talk to kids during their lunch break?
 
There isn't any such thing.But if the kids were members of whatever group and them and the parents supported it and wanted the group to come in and counsel them on their lunch break then that is their right.
We are not talking about the church coming in and accosting kids who want no part of it. They are talking to kids who want to talk.Harrassment is not a right. The parents of the kids want their kids to have some guidance in school and that is what they have been getting.
 
Originally posted by: BugsBunny1078
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
As the first amendment clearly says the government cannot establish a religion nor can it prohibit it.Nor the freedom of speech.
Clearly by not allowing religious talk in school is prohibiting religion and freedom of speech.The ban in unconstitutional. Period.

Well, see, that narrow mind of yours is once again distorting the facts.

By having a Christian preacher come into the school and actually have sermons is establishing a religion. It's telling the students of other religions (or no religion) that the school supports and promotes only Christianity.

It's either all or none.

Preaching belongs in a church...not a government entity...esp. a school!
 
They never had any sermons at that school. They were talking about talking to the kids, not sermonizing.And the school is not supporting any religion by just allowing people to talk about it. At most the school would be supporting the rights guaranteed in our constitution.It is completely ridiculous today that if you even say Jesus in school you will be in trouble.Kids are not even allowed to duiscuss religion among themselves, that is wrong .
Also, schools are a public building not a government building. Everyone has a right to the use of the school.Most of the schools I have seen and I have worked at several hundred of them, anyone can go in and even volunteer to help out. TO exclude people based on religion is unconstitutional.
 
Originally posted by: BugsBunny1078
They never had any sermons at that school. They were talking about talking to the kids, not sermonizing.And the school is not supporting any religion by just allowing people to talk about it. At most the school would be supporting the rights guaranteed in our constitution.It is completely ridiculous today that if you even say Jesus in school you will be in trouble.Kids are not even allowed to duiscuss religion among themselves, that is wrong .
Also, schools are a public building not a government building. Everyone has a right to the use of the school.Most of the schools I have seen and I have worked at several hundred of them, anyone can go in and even volunteer to help out. TO exclude people based on religion is unconstitutional.

Umm..I remember discussing religion a lot in public school. We even had a class in comparative religions, and assignments all through grade school and high school that related to various religions.
 
exactly justin things are completely out of whack today though. THe anti religion people are even trying to take the christmas out of christmas vacation.
 
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: BugsBunny1078
They never had any sermons at that school. They were talking about talking to the kids, not sermonizing.And the school is not supporting any religion by just allowing people to talk about it. At most the school would be supporting the rights guaranteed in our constitution.It is completely ridiculous today that if you even say Jesus in school you will be in trouble.Kids are not even allowed to duiscuss religion among themselves, that is wrong .
Also, schools are a public building not a government building. Everyone has a right to the use of the school.Most of the schools I have seen and I have worked at several hundred of them, anyone can go in and even volunteer to help out. TO exclude people based on religion is unconstitutional.

Umm..I remember discussing religion a lot in public school. We even had a class in comparative religions, and assignments all through grade school and high school that related to various religions.


How long ago was this?

Did your school also forbid the use of the Christmas or not allow students to give out Christmas Cards with the word Jesus on them?

 
Originally posted by: BugsBunny1078
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
As the first amendment clearly says the government cannot establish a religion nor can it prohibit it.Nor the freedom of speech.
Clearly by not allowing religious talk in school is prohibiting religion and freedom of speech.The ban in unconstitutional. Period.

The problem is that by allowing the potential for one religion to access the school, any such religion should have the same right. It boilds down to the impression of favoritism of one religion over another. That can then lean to the endorsement by the governemnt (local) of a religioin. It is best to nip the problem in the bud.
The freedom of religious choice is also to not have to listen (as a captive audience) to religion. When the bounds of school, a child may be forced to listen to some discussion.
A simple discussion may not harm, but the children are so weak minded that they may start thinking for themselves. therefore one must protect the child from themselves.

Also certain religious discussions could turn nasty and threaten the public.

 
They never had any sermons at that school. They were talking about talking to the kids, not sermonizing.And the school is not supporting any religion by just allowing people to talk about it. At most the school would be supporting the rights guaranteed in our constitution.It is completely ridiculous today that if you even say Jesus in school you will be in trouble.Kids are not even allowed to duiscuss religion among themselves, that is wrong .

That's funny, the article explicitly states the reverend had one of his sermons recorded on school grounds, yet you maintain otherwise. Care to share with the rest of us how you arrived at that?
It is completely ridiculous for you to say "even saying Jesus in school will get you in trouble." Feel free to post some proof of that. My HS had a student bible study that met after classes 3 times a week, does that sound like the anti-religion monster you're trying to portray the school system as? You are STILL missing the point of this all: kids are perfectly fine discussing religion amoung themselves, and frequently do, but this matter is about CHURCH MEMBERS entering school grounds during normal hours and evangelizing to the students. There is NOTHING unfair or wrong about wanting the church-goers to keep their activities in the appropriate establishment, and off of the governments paybook.

I hope you can pull your head out of the ground long enough to give us a logical and thoughout reply, instead of the constant martyr-efforts you and your kind seem to be stuck on.


What a HOOOOOT! A christian complaining about 'his' holiday being hijacked by others. Now THAT'S irony!
 
Back
Top