Originally posted by: Stunt
Varying reports?...want to back that up?, first i have heard this information before
Originally posted by: Bonesdad
Originally posted by: M0NEYSH0T
Originally posted by: loki8481
I mostly agree with Moore's politics. but he's a crap film maker, they're misrepresented as documentries, and he "misrepresents" the truth way too often and way too far.
Like in his latest film. Where people are rebutting many of his statements he's saying are fact.
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5239322/
There's more like this, and more will come out once the movie hits mass distribution. I think this person is full of hatred. He also says that he didn't vote for, Clinton. I don't know. I think a film of this sort in an election year is disgraceful.
It's amazing the voice and power the left has...
Yah, disgraceful that he should bring up important issues and questions in an election year...what does he think this is...AMERICA???
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
It's pretty difficult to talk about crime rates and such since so many statistics disagree with each other. For example, I think the United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute consistently ranks the US behind Canada in crime. But then anyone else can pick anything else up because there is is so much disagreement about how statistics are reported, if people report crimes, etc.
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: Helenihi
Originally posted by: Bonesdad
Originally posted by: Hossenfeffer
I'd go along with his point, but I think he shoots himself in the foot a bit when he steps over the line. A prime example is the handling of the Heston interview. It -could- have been a great piece, and good on Heston for agreeing to it. Moore just went too much on the offensive for my taste and it made me cringe a bit to watch. That being said, I enjoyed the film and thought it was relatively fair (though I'll be the first to acknowledge the slant).
How did he go on the offensive??? Heston's comment about "USA is more ethnically diverse than other countries thus we have more murder". yah, that doesn't deserve to be challenged...
I had heard before I saw the film that Moore was hard on poor old moses with Alzheimer's. Heston appeared to think very clearly during and after the interview. It made me cringe to watch too...but because I had lost respect for Heston, whom I once (a long time ago) thought was pretty cool.
You need only look at the crime statistics of this country to realize that saying our nations murder rate may have something to do with it's ethnic make-up isn't an outrageous claim, and it certainly doesn't make one a racist.
If you'd have watched BFC, you'd know that the US isn't the sole Multiracial/Multiethnic counry, hell, it's likely not the most diverse. Yet it's Gun death rates are much higher. It's not a Racial, Ethnic, or diversity issue, something else is the cause.
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
It's pretty difficult to talk about crime rates and such since so many statistics disagree with each other. For example, I think the United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute consistently ranks the US behind Canada in crime. But then anyone else can pick anything else up because there is is so much disagreement about how statistics are reported, if people report crimes, etc.
No it's not. Murder is a Subset of Crime. So, Canada has high other than Murder crimes, quite likely Auto-theft and the like.
Originally posted by: Stunt
The question was how you would explain the higher murder rates...thx
Not what a crime is etc...etc. If you arent talking about murder, you aren't talking in reference to our discussion
Originally posted by: Stunt
"maybe it's because there are more urban areas and a higher population."
The US ranks 163rd in terms of population density. Pop Density
And because you have more urban centres doesnt mean anything. Toronto, London, Amsterdam, etc etc are all fairly large cities. I'm sure criminals are not commiting crimes in Chicago because Detroit exsits. Just as Toronto criminals are not going to murder less because there isn't more urban centres.
Toronto is 4.2 million and had a murder rate of 24 per million over 1997-2002.
Chicago is 2.9 million and had a murder rate of 229 per million over 1997-2002. [data]
"it's all the Canadians that come down to vent out their anger"
yeah...so all the americans convicted in your system were falsly accused and canadians should be charged.
yeah...that's logical. Despirate for reasons are we?
Originally posted by: Stunt
" The main question still remains: Why do US have higher rates of gun killings than rest of the western world?"
I assume the fear generated by the media. If you look at an american broadcast and a canadian broadcast, the american will be more thrilling if you will. Trying to make their story more attractive relative to the many other stations.
Here there are 3 networks who broadcast. Less competitive and relatively unbiased with their accounts of the crimes at hand.
This different style of media exposure, gets people scared of strangers and everyone you dont know could be out to kill you. I guess ppl are willing to act first before they get are the victims.
Also the US has the notion that handguns can be used as protection. Handguns here are rare. Heavy regulations, and you cant exactly carry a rifle around.
So i'd have to say fear, and handguns used as 'protection' and more readily available.
Funniest part of the whole thing is that Moore's movie is right, we don't lock our house, nobody i know does unless gone for extended periods. I also work at a machine shoip for my summer job and i mill handguns which get shipped to the US, without americans hunger for handguns, we'd have a lot less work.
Originally posted by: Stunt
Also the US has the notion that handguns can be used as protection.
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: Aelius
Originally posted by: sandorski
Moore wasn't trying to disgrace or embarrass Heston, he merely showed how when you ask the tough questions even those who should have an answer are dumbstruck, because they have never considered the issue in that way. It goes along with the whole point of the entire Movie, people have not really considered Why they own a gun or what a Gun is, they just own one because of some vague idea that they're Safer, even though the facts prove otherwise.
I agree that some people are in fact dumbstruck or are caught totally off guard when asked a simple question. Fact is it has happend to me professionaly but its very rare. Happens to everyone. Lets not single out someone who isn't exactly in his teens anymore.
As far as your second comment is concerned:
What facts?
What exactly are you talking about?
Your blanket statement is completely baseless, let alone wrong.
If you know something that everyone else, whom is educated on the subject, does not then please by all means share it. Otherwise do not make blanket statements because facts don't point in your direction.
Fact is states that have repealed "Coneal and Carry" laws have seen violent crime drop significantly, while those that keep these laws have seen their violent crime increase significantly.
Florida is a prime example since they repealed that law in 1987, but you can look at just about any state and see what repealing these laws does.
People need to learn the difference between facts and myth. They are not the same.
You cannot just look at a simple # either.
If you are looking at gun deaths/injury/crime nation wide you must question all statistics to see what it is they include. Some will include all actions that involved a gun, including self defense, which makes the statistic useless.
The US has the highest Murder rates in the Industrialized world.
Originally posted by: M0NEYSH0T
Originally posted by: Bonesdad
Originally posted by: M0NEYSH0T
Originally posted by: loki8481
I mostly agree with Moore's politics. but he's a crap film maker, they're misrepresented as documentries, and he "misrepresents" the truth way too often and way too far.
Like in his latest film. Where people are rebutting many of his statements he's saying are fact.
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5239322/
There's more like this, and more will come out once the movie hits mass distribution. I think this person is full of hatred. He also says that he didn't vote for, Clinton. I don't know. I think a film of this sort in an election year is disgraceful.
It's amazing the voice and power the left has...
Yah, disgraceful that he should bring up important issues and questions in an election year...what does he think this is...AMERICA???
You are BLIND if you think that this is being American, and portraying important issues? ALL SPIN for the sole attempt at swaying an election. Would something like this be in mass distribution if it were about Kerry? Nope.
I hope to God Bush is elected and he tells the Justice department to carefully audit Moore and his Miramix partners. :r. Evil'esq Grin, Laugh, Rubbing Hands together muh huh huh huh ::
Then again, I don't suppose that would be as corrupt as pardoning a person (Marc Rich) who has been evading more than $48 million in taxes... No, not at all...
Originally posted by: Bonesdad
Originally posted by: M0NEYSH0T
Originally posted by: Bonesdad
Originally posted by: M0NEYSH0T
Originally posted by: loki8481
I mostly agree with Moore's politics. but he's a crap film maker, they're misrepresented as documentries, and he "misrepresents" the truth way too often and way too far.
Like in his latest film. Where people are rebutting many of his statements he's saying are fact.
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5239322/
There's more like this, and more will come out once the movie hits mass distribution. I think this person is full of hatred. He also says that he didn't vote for, Clinton. I don't know. I think a film of this sort in an election year is disgraceful.
It's amazing the voice and power the left has...
Yah, disgraceful that he should bring up important issues and questions in an election year...what does he think this is...AMERICA???
You are BLIND if you think that this is being American, and portraying important issues? ALL SPIN for the sole attempt at swaying an election. Would something like this be in mass distribution if it were about Kerry? Nope.
I hope to God Bush is elected and he tells the Justice department to carefully audit Moore and his Miramix partners. :r. Evil'esq Grin, Laugh, Rubbing Hands together muh huh huh huh ::
Then again, I don't suppose that would be as corrupt as pardoning a person (Marc Rich) who has been evading more than $48 million in taxes... No, not at all...
I hope to God Bush is elected and he tells the Justice department to carefully audit Moore and his Miramix partners. :r. Evil'esq Grin, Laugh, Rubbing Hands together muh huh huh huh ::
THAT's the America we are becoming...
all Moore does in this movie is ask questions...he has no answers...except to say that we have a problem, and it appears the MEDIA is fueling our fear (you conservatives love to hate the MEDIA right? well, there ya go, you were right after all...)
and MURDER of children is not an important issue in your world?
And I seem to remember several month/years of continual "hunting of the president" when Mr Clinton was in office...now all of a sudden it's a crime to question our president and his policies...
WAKE UP...this is what America is about...if you don't like something, challenge it and CHANGE it. I can only pray that the non-voters out there will get out and VOTE this year...then we will see which man is our President. Bush is the most dangerous president this country has seen since Nixon. But wait, Nixon was republican...he couldn't have done anything wrong...
Originally posted by: Stunt
Again, i higly doubt that people commit more murders because there are more urban centres.
Look at a per city basis and there is a big difference in murder rates in other countries compared to the US.
still looking for a good reason for the increased murder rates.
Oh and the murders in Canada wer by americans...so we have no murders...hah...im funny...![]()
I really do think that urban centers create more violence - it's debated a lot. Why are you just dismissing the lack of social help from the government, too? If you highly doubt that it is a factor, chances are it is given your reputation
Originally posted by: M0NEYSH0T
Originally posted by: Stunt
So go make a documentary praising bush and bashing kerry, it is a free country, go nuts.
You admittedly said that the pubic has the wrong impression of the facts...even with the huge liberal media as you say. So what is wrong with informing them with some facts that could help them see more clearly. I mean if they take moore as fact, that'd be foolish, but even more foolish is to believe the info out of the bush admin. There needs to be some sort of a counter to this. Moore has done a good job at this as the media has failed.
Yeah, the liberal owners of Hollywood would push that. Are you not seeing my point? Remove the blinders from your eyes.
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
... and (*maybe* this one might trample individual freedoms) the ability of police to quickly identify that a residence they are called to, or that has been burgled, may have firearms present. (I would like the police to know quickly that the suspects in a house robbery may have aquired a gun in the process, though as I said, an evaluation of privacy concerns might trump this particular benefit of gun control, I'm not sure)....