saw 'Columbine' last night...

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Varying reports?...want to back that up?, first i have heard this information before
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: Stunt
Varying reports?...want to back that up?, first i have heard this information before

You must not read crime statistics threads (they're always debated in other forums, not talked about much here for some reason) :) People always cry about this report or that one, crime reporting methodology, methods that the FBI or other government agencies tally crime statistics, crime reported vs. case solved, whether people report crimes or not, etc. I mentioned one report that rates the US behind Canada in crime (that is the US has less crime than Canada), I'm sure I can find 5 more that say the opposite. For some reason it's a pretty sensitive subject.
 

M0NEYSH0T

Senior member
Jun 11, 2003
557
0
0
Originally posted by: Bonesdad
Originally posted by: M0NEYSH0T
Originally posted by: loki8481
I mostly agree with Moore's politics. but he's a crap film maker, they're misrepresented as documentries, and he "misrepresents" the truth way too often and way too far.

Like in his latest film. Where people are rebutting many of his statements he's saying are fact.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5239322/

There's more like this, and more will come out once the movie hits mass distribution. I think this person is full of hatred. He also says that he didn't vote for, Clinton. I don't know. I think a film of this sort in an election year is disgraceful.

It's amazing the voice and power the left has...



Yah, disgraceful that he should bring up important issues and questions in an election year...what does he think this is...AMERICA???


You are BLIND if you think that this is being American, and portraying important issues? ALL SPIN for the sole attempt at swaying an election. Would something like this be in mass distribution if it were about Kerry? Nope.

I hope to God Bush is elected and he tells the Justice department to carefully audit Moore and his Miramix partners. ::Dr. Evil'esq Grin, Laugh, Rubbing Hands together muh huh huh huh ::

Then again, I don't suppose that would be as corrupt as pardoning a person (Marc Rich) who has been evading more than $48 million in taxes... No, not at all...
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,783
6,341
126
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
It's pretty difficult to talk about crime rates and such since so many statistics disagree with each other. For example, I think the United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute consistently ranks the US behind Canada in crime. But then anyone else can pick anything else up because there is is so much disagreement about how statistics are reported, if people report crimes, etc.

No it's not. Murder is a Subset of Crime. So, Canada has high other than Murder crimes, quite likely Auto-theft and the like.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: Helenihi
Originally posted by: Bonesdad
Originally posted by: Hossenfeffer
I'd go along with his point, but I think he shoots himself in the foot a bit when he steps over the line. A prime example is the handling of the Heston interview. It -could- have been a great piece, and good on Heston for agreeing to it. Moore just went too much on the offensive for my taste and it made me cringe a bit to watch. That being said, I enjoyed the film and thought it was relatively fair (though I'll be the first to acknowledge the slant).

How did he go on the offensive??? Heston's comment about "USA is more ethnically diverse than other countries thus we have more murder". yah, that doesn't deserve to be challenged...

I had heard before I saw the film that Moore was hard on poor old moses with Alzheimer's. Heston appeared to think very clearly during and after the interview. It made me cringe to watch too...but because I had lost respect for Heston, whom I once (a long time ago) thought was pretty cool.

You need only look at the crime statistics of this country to realize that saying our nations murder rate may have something to do with it's ethnic make-up isn't an outrageous claim, and it certainly doesn't make one a racist.

If you'd have watched BFC, you'd know that the US isn't the sole Multiracial/Multiethnic counry, hell, it's likely not the most diverse. Yet it's Gun death rates are much higher. It's not a Racial, Ethnic, or diversity issue, something else is the cause.

I think every country in the world calls itself the most ethnically diverse country in the world. Some respected reports even put Uganda as the most ethnically diverse country in the world. Countries like Indonesia practice fine-grain ethnicity - I think they have over 300 different ethnicities.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
It's pretty difficult to talk about crime rates and such since so many statistics disagree with each other. For example, I think the United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute consistently ranks the US behind Canada in crime. But then anyone else can pick anything else up because there is is so much disagreement about how statistics are reported, if people report crimes, etc.

No it's not. Murder is a Subset of Crime. So, Canada has high other than Murder crimes, quite likely Auto-theft and the like.

Well I'm not talking about murder, but there's even debate about murder statistics. Even what a violent crime is - some people think rape is a violent crime but some reports won't consider it one.
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
The question was how you would explain the higher murder rates...thx

Not what a crime is etc...etc. If you arent talking about murder, you aren't talking in reference to our discussion
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: Stunt
The question was how you would explain the higher murder rates...thx

Not what a crime is etc...etc. If you arent talking about murder, you aren't talking in reference to our discussion

I wasn't really talking about your discussion, just making a generic comment about BFC and crime statistics.

Anyways, maybe it's because there are more urban areas and a higher population. People probably have less social help from the government, too. Or maybe it's all the Canadians that come down to vent out their anger :)
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
"maybe it's because there are more urban areas and a higher population."

The US ranks 163rd in terms of population density. Pop Density

And because you have more urban centres doesnt mean anything. Toronto, London, Amsterdam, etc etc are all fairly large cities. I'm sure criminals are not commiting crimes in Chicago because Detroit exsits. Just as Toronto criminals are not going to murder less because there isn't more urban centres.

Toronto is 4.2 million and had a murder rate of 24 per million over 1997-2002.
Chicago is 2.9 million and had a murder rate of 229 per million over 1997-2002. [data]

"it's all the Canadians that come down to vent out their anger"

yeah...so all the americans convicted in your system were falsly accused and canadians should be charged.
yeah...that's logical. Despirate for reasons are we?
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: Stunt
"maybe it's because there are more urban areas and a higher population."

The US ranks 163rd in terms of population density. Pop Density

I'm not talking about population density. Just more urban areas.

And because you have more urban centres doesnt mean anything. Toronto, London, Amsterdam, etc etc are all fairly large cities. I'm sure criminals are not commiting crimes in Chicago because Detroit exsits. Just as Toronto criminals are not going to murder less because there isn't more urban centres.

Toronto is 4.2 million and had a murder rate of 24 per million over 1997-2002.
Chicago is 2.9 million and had a murder rate of 229 per million over 1997-2002. [data]

"it's all the Canadians that come down to vent out their anger"

yeah...so all the americans convicted in your system were falsly accused and canadians should be charged.
yeah...that's logical. Despirate for reasons are we?

Jesus, that's just a joke. Lighten up, you take everything so seriously.

Anyways, you missed my 2 points.
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Again, i higly doubt that people commit more murders because there are more urban centres.
Look at a per city basis and there is a big difference in murder rates in other countries compared to the US.

still looking for a good reason for the increased murder rates.

Oh and the murders in Canada wer by americans...so we have no murders...hah...im funny...:p
 

imported_Aelius

Golden Member
Apr 25, 2004
1,988
0
0
Originally posted by: Stunt
" The main question still remains: Why do US have higher rates of gun killings than rest of the western world?"

I assume the fear generated by the media. If you look at an american broadcast and a canadian broadcast, the american will be more thrilling if you will. Trying to make their story more attractive relative to the many other stations.

Here there are 3 networks who broadcast. Less competitive and relatively unbiased with their accounts of the crimes at hand.

This different style of media exposure, gets people scared of strangers and everyone you dont know could be out to kill you. I guess ppl are willing to act first before they get are the victims.

Also the US has the notion that handguns can be used as protection. Handguns here are rare. Heavy regulations, and you cant exactly carry a rifle around.

So i'd have to say fear, and handguns used as 'protection' and more readily available.

Funniest part of the whole thing is that Moore's movie is right, we don't lock our house, nobody i know does unless gone for extended periods. I also work at a machine shoip for my summer job and i mill handguns which get shipped to the US, without americans hunger for handguns, we'd have a lot less work.

I have to agree that US news networks overblow everything that is bad and ignore the good. There is a saying; There is no news like bad news.

Originally posted by: Stunt
Also the US has the notion that handguns can be used as protection.

That's because it can and it does work.

Canada is different because most of our laws are based around protecting civil rights and having respect for a variety of backgrounds. That's what makes Canada special.

Countries like the US, UK, and Australia have a history of passing laws to prohibit civil rights and to protect a minority. In their case a minority is the political elite. They aren't a police state yet nor have they completely converted to a spiting image of Nazi Germany but they are nowhere near the shining beacon of Civil Rights and Liberties.

They aren't alone, as there are plenty of other nations whom are doing the same thing, just not at the same intensity.

Granted Canada also has its faults, as do any nation with a political system, where things that are normally behind closed doors are revealed to the public.

Canada isn't crystal clean, but at least I can see the dirt, unlike the US, UK, and others whom are dirty enough that it would take dozens of generations to overcome it.

Here are the ones I can come up with from the top of my head that are all criminal where no real justice has or ever will be done;

Japanese internment 1942

(fuzzy on Canadian civil rights violation between 1942 and 1994, anyone is welcome to add anything)

RCMP and Canadian Forces at Oka 1994

OPP at Ipperwash 1995

RCMP at Gustafsen Lake, fully supported by NDP Attorney General of BC 1995

Walkerton E Coli. Tragedy, thanks to Conservative cuts and outsourcing of public safety system 2000

Security of Information Act
Passing bill-C36, bill-C35 every politician guilty of not reading it or understanding the implications and then supporting it, Nov 2001

Maher Arar deported by US then tortured by Syria (asked specific questions regarding his involvment with a known terrorist in Canada that only the RCMP and CSIS knew), at request of and or approval of CSIS and RCMP whom also provided evidence (fact or fiction) to support the deportation Sep 2002

RCMP search the home and office (thx to bill-C36) of Juliet O'Neill an Ottawa Citizen reporter who reported on evidence re Maher Arar deportation/torture Jan 2004

Muayyed Nureddin arrested while crossing into Syria and subsequently tortured (again specific information used against him) he is seeking to be added to the Arar Inquiery 2004

Liberal Sponsorship Scandle 2004

No end in sight.

I'm sure there are lots more but quite frankly I can pretty much name most of them. Can't say the same for other nations.
 

imported_Aelius

Golden Member
Apr 25, 2004
1,988
0
0
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: Aelius
Originally posted by: sandorski
Moore wasn't trying to disgrace or embarrass Heston, he merely showed how when you ask the tough questions even those who should have an answer are dumbstruck, because they have never considered the issue in that way. It goes along with the whole point of the entire Movie, people have not really considered Why they own a gun or what a Gun is, they just own one because of some vague idea that they're Safer, even though the facts prove otherwise.

I agree that some people are in fact dumbstruck or are caught totally off guard when asked a simple question. Fact is it has happend to me professionaly but its very rare. Happens to everyone. Lets not single out someone who isn't exactly in his teens anymore.

As far as your second comment is concerned:

What facts?

What exactly are you talking about?

Your blanket statement is completely baseless, let alone wrong.

If you know something that everyone else, whom is educated on the subject, does not then please by all means share it. Otherwise do not make blanket statements because facts don't point in your direction.

Fact is states that have repealed "Coneal and Carry" laws have seen violent crime drop significantly, while those that keep these laws have seen their violent crime increase significantly.

Florida is a prime example since they repealed that law in 1987, but you can look at just about any state and see what repealing these laws does.

People need to learn the difference between facts and myth. They are not the same.

You cannot just look at a simple # either.

If you are looking at gun deaths/injury/crime nation wide you must question all statistics to see what it is they include. Some will include all actions that involved a gun, including self defense, which makes the statistic useless.

The US has the highest Murder rates in the Industrialized world.

The US is one of the largest consumers of drugs in the world, if not the largest.

Want to cut crime dramatically including Murder rate?

End the War on Drugs and instead treat it as a medical problem since thats what it is.

Edit: Do you realize what prohibition did to the US when you guys banned alcohol? Do you know what happend when it was lifted? The US still hasn't fully recovered from that and there are plenty of rich people walking around whos family got rich off prohibition and all those dead Americans. I'm not just talking about the Mob but also those who illegally sold alcohol to the Mob like the Canadian Bronfmans who ended up owning major US firms like Universal Pictures, and virtually every single brand name alcohol sold in North America and elsewhere. They impact the US even today.
 

Bonesdad

Platinum Member
Nov 18, 2002
2,213
0
76
Originally posted by: M0NEYSH0T
Originally posted by: Bonesdad
Originally posted by: M0NEYSH0T
Originally posted by: loki8481
I mostly agree with Moore's politics. but he's a crap film maker, they're misrepresented as documentries, and he "misrepresents" the truth way too often and way too far.

Like in his latest film. Where people are rebutting many of his statements he's saying are fact.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5239322/

There's more like this, and more will come out once the movie hits mass distribution. I think this person is full of hatred. He also says that he didn't vote for, Clinton. I don't know. I think a film of this sort in an election year is disgraceful.

It's amazing the voice and power the left has...



Yah, disgraceful that he should bring up important issues and questions in an election year...what does he think this is...AMERICA???


You are BLIND if you think that this is being American, and portraying important issues? ALL SPIN for the sole attempt at swaying an election. Would something like this be in mass distribution if it were about Kerry? Nope.

I hope to God Bush is elected and he tells the Justice department to carefully audit Moore and his Miramix partners. ::Dr. Evil'esq Grin, Laugh, Rubbing Hands together muh huh huh huh ::

Then again, I don't suppose that would be as corrupt as pardoning a person (Marc Rich) who has been evading more than $48 million in taxes... No, not at all...




I hope to God Bush is elected and he tells the Justice department to carefully audit Moore and his Miramix partners. ::Dr. Evil'esq Grin, Laugh, Rubbing Hands together muh huh huh huh ::

THAT's the America we are becoming...

all Moore does in this movie is ask questions...he has no answers...except to say that we have a problem, and it appears the MEDIA is fueling our fear (you conservatives love to hate the MEDIA right? well, there ya go, you were right after all...)

and MURDER of children is not an important issue in your world?

And I seem to remember several month/years of continual "hunting of the president" when Mr Clinton was in office...now all of a sudden it's a crime to question our president and his policies...

WAKE UP...this is what America is about...if you don't like something, challenge it and CHANGE it. I can only pray that the non-voters out there will get out and VOTE this year...then we will see which man is our President. Bush is the most dangerous president this country has seen since Nixon. But wait, Nixon was republican...he couldn't have done anything wrong...
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,783
6,341
126
Originally posted by: Bonesdad
Originally posted by: M0NEYSH0T
Originally posted by: Bonesdad
Originally posted by: M0NEYSH0T
Originally posted by: loki8481
I mostly agree with Moore's politics. but he's a crap film maker, they're misrepresented as documentries, and he "misrepresents" the truth way too often and way too far.

Like in his latest film. Where people are rebutting many of his statements he's saying are fact.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5239322/

There's more like this, and more will come out once the movie hits mass distribution. I think this person is full of hatred. He also says that he didn't vote for, Clinton. I don't know. I think a film of this sort in an election year is disgraceful.

It's amazing the voice and power the left has...



Yah, disgraceful that he should bring up important issues and questions in an election year...what does he think this is...AMERICA???


You are BLIND if you think that this is being American, and portraying important issues? ALL SPIN for the sole attempt at swaying an election. Would something like this be in mass distribution if it were about Kerry? Nope.

I hope to God Bush is elected and he tells the Justice department to carefully audit Moore and his Miramix partners. ::Dr. Evil'esq Grin, Laugh, Rubbing Hands together muh huh huh huh ::

Then again, I don't suppose that would be as corrupt as pardoning a person (Marc Rich) who has been evading more than $48 million in taxes... No, not at all...




I hope to God Bush is elected and he tells the Justice department to carefully audit Moore and his Miramix partners. ::Dr. Evil'esq Grin, Laugh, Rubbing Hands together muh huh huh huh ::

THAT's the America we are becoming...

all Moore does in this movie is ask questions...he has no answers...except to say that we have a problem, and it appears the MEDIA is fueling our fear (you conservatives love to hate the MEDIA right? well, there ya go, you were right after all...)

and MURDER of children is not an important issue in your world?

And I seem to remember several month/years of continual "hunting of the president" when Mr Clinton was in office...now all of a sudden it's a crime to question our president and his policies...

WAKE UP...this is what America is about...if you don't like something, challenge it and CHANGE it. I can only pray that the non-voters out there will get out and VOTE this year...then we will see which man is our President. Bush is the most dangerous president this country has seen since Nixon. But wait, Nixon was republican...he couldn't have done anything wrong...

..but you(US) are at War. You must support the President in a time of War!

Of course that "War" is so ill-defined that you can practically ignore those who attacked the US and use the "War" to attack others based on shady reasoning. ;)
 

Helenihi

Senior member
Dec 25, 2001
379
0
0
The US is much more diverse than most of Europe. The UK is something like 97% white, the US won't even have an ethnic majority in a few more decades. In some areas (So. CAlifornia), there already isn't one.


Second, what causes are crime rates is a complex question and one that can't even be touched on in a shallow 2 hour film. There is an entire science (criminology) devoted to studying crime. People spend their lives pouring over statistics and talking with people and communities to understand and prevent murder and crime. None of them seriously believe it's the fault of the Media. There are plenty of theories floating around with some decent evidence to back them up, it's most likely some sort of combination.

What we do know about our high murder rate, is that it's causes by certain segments of our population, and is not a problem experienced everywhere here. The vast majority of the US is just as safe as anywhere else. Most communities in the US have murder rates in line or lower than Canada or Europe.

However, the ghettos and similar areas of this country completely throw off those statistics. Murder rates are several orders of magnitude larger than in most of the country. Half of all murders in LA take place in South Central. If you want to find out why LA has so many murders, you should be in South Central. Of course if you really want to find out why and not just make a quick buck and shock some retards in the theater, you'd have to spend a few months out there talking with families, police, community leaders, gang members, store owners, the people who live out our high murder rate every day. You have to be looking at statistics to see when murders go up and when they go down, and try and figure out what made them change.

And that crap about Canada and locking doors is BS. On another forum (somethingawful), we had an informal survey and there was no difference between Canadians and Americans. Plenty of Canadians lock their doors, and plenty of Americans don't. Going to a couple houses and cherry picking your statistics means NOTHING.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: Stunt
Again, i higly doubt that people commit more murders because there are more urban centres.
Look at a per city basis and there is a big difference in murder rates in other countries compared to the US.

still looking for a good reason for the increased murder rates.

Oh and the murders in Canada wer by americans...so we have no murders...hah...im funny...:p

I really do think that urban centers create more violence - it's debated a lot. Why are you just dismissing the lack of social help from the government, too? If you highly doubt that it is a factor, chances are it is given your reputation :D

Plus, I think Toronto should have a low crime rate. Isn't it dominated by Indian and Chinese immigrants and their descendants? I would think those ethnic groups commit less crime since they're usually higher income ethnicities (at least in the US Indians and Chinese). I think some call it the most multicultural or ethnically diverse city in the world - more proof that multiculturalism and diversity works for the non-believers that have already stated that it is a failure.
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
I really do think that urban centers create more violence - it's debated a lot. Why are you just dismissing the lack of social help from the government, too? If you highly doubt that it is a factor, chances are it is given your reputation

I agree urban centres have increased crime. Look at the average small town and the numbers would be less. But 10 times more murders in a US city than a canadian...sounds pretty rough to me...There has got to be a reason for the large discrepancy in figures.

Toronto is not dominated by indian and chinese immigrants. Some here are saying that the US is more culturally diverse. So you should have less with that reasoning.

43% are visible minorities in Toronto. Link

26% of whom are south asian, 22% Chinese, 19% Black.

42% of people in Chicago are white. 42% black

so make of it what you will...base it on race if you will...you could argue some races are more prone to murders...i wouldnt say that but form your own judgements...
 

judasmachine

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2002
8,515
3
81
Originally posted by: M0NEYSH0T
Originally posted by: Stunt
So go make a documentary praising bush and bashing kerry, it is a free country, go nuts.

You admittedly said that the pubic has the wrong impression of the facts...even with the huge liberal media as you say. So what is wrong with informing them with some facts that could help them see more clearly. I mean if they take moore as fact, that'd be foolish, but even more foolish is to believe the info out of the bush admin. There needs to be some sort of a counter to this. Moore has done a good job at this as the media has failed.

Yeah, the liberal owners of Hollywood would push that. Are you not seeing my point? Remove the blinders from your eyes.


The consevatives at Disney almost didn't let F911 get released. The filmakers may be liberal but they are still subject to their billionaire sugardaddies the right leaning corporate execs.
 

DeeKnow

Platinum Member
Jan 28, 2002
2,470
0
71
it's just too easy to lump people into liberals/conservatives/neocons/homosexuals/whatever and avoid facing up to real questions... I'm not even sure what the hell is a liberal or a conservative anymore... anyone care to define these terms that are lobbed around with such abandon here (and in the hallowed mass media, by the way)?
 

Bling

Member
May 11, 2004
53
0
0
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
... and (*maybe* this one might trample individual freedoms) the ability of police to quickly identify that a residence they are called to, or that has been burgled, may have firearms present. (I would like the police to know quickly that the suspects in a house robbery may have aquired a gun in the process, though as I said, an evaluation of privacy concerns might trump this particular benefit of gun control, I'm not sure)....

Law enforcers should assume that this type of subject has a gun.