save a tree use a shirt sleeve

[slayer202]

You know full well you pwnted yourself. We are talking about tissue. A specific product. I've never seen tissue that wasn't milled in the USA.
You're arguing about something you only introduced for an argument.

no one is talking about tissues. shall I call your caretaker for you?

 

[Train]

I'm not going to go google for facts for what should be common sense. All I'm saying is your original post is stupid, because it's plain wrong.

quoted for hilarity.

 

[slayer202]

quoted for hilarity.

you still haven't answered if you seriously believe

All paper products in the USA are made from renewable forests.

The bold is mine. So either you admit your statement was wrong or we'll just agree that I think you are ignorant to reality. I know the correct answer, let's see about you

 

[Train]

you still haven't answered if you seriously believe

The bold is mine. So either you admit your statement was wrong or we'll just agree that I think you are ignorant to reality. I know the correct answer, let's see about you

The guy who refuses to post a single fact telling me I am ignorant of reality.

All paper products made in the usa ARE made from renewable forests, and no, you can't refute this with "should be common sense".

Post some facts or STFU.

 

[slayer202]

So now it's only MADE in the USA? I don't know US law but the link you posted does not confirm that. And what's the difference when we import 10-12% of paper, and who knows what percent of other paper products. I don't need facts to shoot down your idiotic statements that obviously aren't true. You haven't posted any relevant facts to your argument

 

[Train]

So now it's only MADE in the USA? I don't know US law but the link you posted does not confirm that. And what's the difference when we import 10-12% of paper, and who knows what percent of other paper products. I don't need facts to shoot down your idiotic statements that obviously aren't true. You haven't posted any relevant facts to your argument

My links may not confirm a few things, but your links confirm nothing.

"obviously aren't true" ? Then it should be VERY easy to post some facts disproving me. Until you do, S.T.F.U.

 

[slayer202]

All paper products in the USA are made from renewable forests.

Still haven't answered if you believe it.

1. Imported products - strike 1
2. Illegally produced domestic products - strike 2. Do anti-drug laws mean that no one in the USA does drugs?

We don't need 3 strikes, you're out. I don't need facts to state the obvious. You haven't made any true statements. You lose. Let's amend your statement:

NOT All paper products in the USA are made from renewable forests.

 

[Train]

Show me a single case of illegally produced domestic wood. That would be fucking hilarious.

You are really reaching for it now.

 

[Train]

I'll also let you in on some common sense... no one is going to illegaly import or try to grow a rosewood tree to make paper products.

 

[slayer202]

you're an idiot, sorry. simple as that. all I've been doing is arguing your completely false statement that "All paper products in the USA are made from renewable forests." You can't possibly believe this because it is insane. That's ALL I've been arguing, and clearly you don't actually believe it because you won't answer the question, so I guess you aren't THAT dumb.

Oh wait, let me look at that last post again, maybe you are that dumb. When did I mention produced wood? You don't think illegal logging takes place in the USA? Nowhere? EVER? please....

 

[Train]

Yes I believe it, because it is true. You can't refute it by sounding off like an idiot.

Post some facts, or continue to be wrong by default.

 

[slayer202]

http://www.voanews.com/english/news/usa/Resurrected-US-Law-Curbs-Illegal-Logging--95119434.html

http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/campaigns/forests/forests-worldwide/illegal-logging/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_logging

You are an idiot. Arguing with an idiot is useless, so I will stop now.

 

[Train]

bwuahahaha,

Let me quote the first one:

The US Congress amends century-old law to target illegally logged imports

keyword is bolded.

Your second link makes no mention of anything in the US, at all.

Your 3rd link is a wikipedia article that only has a few sentences about the US, and those only speak of updated laws, nothing else.