- Apr 30, 2012
- 1,112
- 174
- 106
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/samsung-amd-qualcomm-apple-finfet,27808.html
Samsung, Qualcomm and apple! Oh and AMD too apparently.
Samsung, Qualcomm and apple! Oh and AMD too apparently.
Huh, so AMD are going with GloFo and Samsung, not TSMC.
Don't see why they would. TSMC is going to lose out on 16/14nm. They were simply beat to the punch. They're behind in density, and behind on their introduction date. They'll do fine though, even with being behind, and they'll probably have something real nice at "10nm."Huh, so AMD are going with GloFo and Samsung, not TSMC.
You mean like Intel's 22 nm was fake due to not improving density enough compared to 32 nm?This is already known, but it's fake 14 nm though. It's not any better than TSMC's 16FF, which is really 20 nm with finfets.
You mean like Intel's 22 nm was fake due to not improving density enough compared to 32 nm?
It's not any better than TSMC's 16FF, which is really 20 nm with finfets.
Yeah, Samsung/GloFo actually has the better FinFET process. 16FF+ is TSMC's attempt to reconcile that.It's is better than TSMC's 16FF. Probably comparable to 16FF+ (or rather vice versa).
Yeah, Samsung/GloFo actually has the better FinFET process. 16FF+ is TSMC's attempt to reconcile that.
Isn't this already known? Except for AMD, that is?
Lisa Su said:"This unprecedented collaboration will result in a global capacity footprint for 14nm FinFET technology that provides AMD with enhanced capabilities to bring our innovative IP into silicon on leading-edge technologies," said Lisa Su, senior vice president and general manager of Global Business Units at AMD. "The work that GLOBALFOUNDRIES and Samsung are doing together will help AMD deliver our next generation of groundbreaking products with new levels of processing and graphics capabilities to devices ranging from low-power mobile devices, to next-generation dense servers to high-performance embedded solutions."
You mean like Intel's 22 nm was fake due to not improving density enough compared to 32 nm?
Didn't take long to turn this into an Intel bashing thread by the ADL.
Whoops, looks like I missed that announcement. Thanks.AMD was the very first publicly mentioned customer for Samsung's (Globalfoundries) 14nm FinFet process:
http://www.samsung.com/global/business/semiconductor/news-events/press-releases/detail?newsId=13364
http://globalfoundries.com/newsroom...ering-of-14nm-finfet-semiconductor-technology
How can they say they will have 14nm when they dont even have 20nm.
The main critical upgrade that the new chips revolve around is the manufacturing process, as Samsung delivers its first 20nm SoC product and is also at the same time the first manufacturer to do so.
Is that device actually shipping?
Is that device actually shipping?
"In a session here, Samsung and GlobalFoundries reiterated their ongoing partnership, announced in April, on the 14nm process. Both companies aim to have products ramping into volume production next year. They will follow-up with a version of the process, now being qualified, that will be optimized for high performance." -(link)
So Samsung now has products on the market at a later node than Intel (20 vs 22 nm). It won't last for long since Intel soon will be releasing 14 nm products, but still...