No, good point. I will reformat as FAT32 and retest.
Keep it the way it is if you use it in the cell as fat 32 will be slower once changed over in the gs4
No, good point. I will reformat as FAT32 and retest.
You should try exFAT if the phone supports this particular file system.No, good point. I will reformat as FAT32 and retest.
You should try exFAT if the phone supports this particular file system.
Keep it the way it is if you use it in the cell as fat 32 will be slower once changed over in the gs4
Then you may want to look at other options(storage cards) because FAT32 isn't going to give you much of a benefit, if any that is.It is formatted exFAT by default. Those are exFAT numbers.
Then you may want to look at other options(storage cards) because FAT32 isn't going to give you much of a benefit, if any that is.
Which SanDisk did you buy?OK this Sandisk card officially sucks. My write speeds across the board are half as slow as my class 6 32GB Samsung card. The 4k writes don't go above a 2:
I guess I will return it and pay the premium for the Samsung 64GB Micro card.
SDSDQUI-064G-A11 is what it says. That seems to be the same model Amazon sells.
Here is what my 32GB Class 6 Samsung (MB-MSBGB) does:
SDSD=sd card
Q =class 4 (black) available in 2,4,8,16,32GB
QY =class 6 "Ultra" (red & grey) available in 4GB (8,16,32gb discontinued but still on sale)
QUA=class 10 "Ultra" 8,16,32=SDHC 64=SDXC* (UHS-I = UHS class 1 = 10mb/s #)
QUI=class 10 "Ultra" apparently "designed for cameras" and NOT the same card (black packaging)
-032G=32GB
-U46=EU packaging@
-A11=US packaging@
-FFP=Amazon frustration free packaging@
A=picture of android on package
It looks like Samsung has addressed some of the concerns in the OP. Admirable considering how bad their bloated launcher is. The response time is also excellent. Good job, Samsung. Now fix your OLED screens to make them as good as AUO's...
http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/06/galaxy-s-4-software-update/
Dari just for shits and giggles can you post one review that has a screen made from auo that beats the latest from Samsung in oled
Who cares what someone thinks when I can judge by myself. Also, in the 4-4.3 smartphone thread, many people here like the HTC One S and Droid Razr, both 2012 midrange phones with AUO's OLED screens. I myself have both of those phones and I love the screens.
Really? I had the Droid Razr and the screen sucked ass.
It looks like Samsung has addressed some of the concerns in the OP. Admirable considering how bad their bloated launcher is. The response time is also excellent. Good job, Samsung. Now fix your OLED screens to make them as good as AUO's...
http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/06/galaxy-s-4-software-update/
Really? I had the Droid Razr and the screen sucked ass.
It looks like Samsung has addressed some of the concerns in the OP. Admirable considering how bad their bloated launcher is. The response time is also excellent. Good job, Samsung. Now fix your OLED screens to make them as good as AUO's...
http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/06/galaxy-s-4-software-update/
I really feel like people are stretching this a bit.
So the people possibly affected are 'gamers' who need to install dozens of games, most of which are <100mb, but there are a couple games I saw in the top 20 paid games that are 1 GB. So we go with the premise that there is this niche of users who buy and download dozens of the largest games available in the Play Store.
Whether 9.6GB or 12GB (say without the bloat) are available in internal storage on a 16GB S4, either number sounds too constrained for this niche of gamers. These people should get the 32GB or even 64GB S4, which is on the way.
So they buy a 32GB or 64GB phone and still have the option of slapping in another 64GB mSD for the rest of their media for under $40.
But i am quite sure Samsung instead would be more than happy to sell a lcd screen in a high price phone for everyone. Especially Dari