• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Salma Hayek is off the market

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: mundane
Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: mundane
Originally posted by: JS80
1) Unibrow
2) Short
3) Big head
4) 40 years old

5) Not that good looking

Bullsh!t

Complete bullsh!t

I know the image quality of that pic wasn't great, but I thought my intent was clear. I was unable to find a better shot from that movie quickly. For her age (even regardless of her age), she still is one of the best looking women.

Your pic isn't from Desperado. It's from the second, horrible one with Johnny Depp. She looked far better in Desperado because she wasn't trying to look tough or butch.
 
Originally posted by: purbeast0
LMAO ... only on ATOT will you hear people say Salma Hayek is not that good looking, but the little boy looking Natalie Portman is hot.

Thank you, Jesus!
 
Originally posted by: purbeast0
LMAO ... only on ATOT will you hear people say Salma Hayek is not that good looking, but the little boy looking Natalie Portman is hot.

Oh no you didn't.
 
ehh.. I've seen hotter.. Personally, if I EVER had the POSSIBILITY to ever choose between Salma... and lets say.... most of the girls on this years SI swimsuit issue... i would definitely pick the swimsuit girls... NOW some of those girls are HAWT!!! 🙂
 
Originally posted by: jjsole
I'm betting that when her child is born, it will be taller than her.

well, no crap. that's obvious... her husband's taller than her, the child is more than likely going to be taller.

in fact, there's a formula for estimating the height of the child you produce...

boy height = [(mom's height in cm + dad's height in cm)/2] + 6.5cm
girl height = [(mom's height in cm + dad's height in cm)/2] - 6.5cm
 
Originally posted by: DannyLove
wow. 40 and first child. that's awesome.

No it's not. Increased risk of birth defects for the baby and an increased chance of miscarriage.

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: mundane
Originally posted by: JS80
1) Unibrow
2) Short
3) Big head
4) 40 years old

5) Not that good looking

Bullsh!t

Complete bullsh!t

She has a smoking body, but her face just doesn't do it for me. She's far from ugly...but I wouldn't say she's amazingly hot.
 
Back
Top