BonzaiDuck
Lifer
- Jun 30, 2004
- 16,845
- 2,162
- 126
The problem with the nutters who think tyranny is knocking at the door, is that they don't really see how things work. And don't lecture me about my age: I was 16 when they blew JFK away.
There are statistics which are small samples. They are indicative of things people have ignored for years, but some small samples cannot be "conclusive" because of the size or number of observations.
Eisenhower warned of the Military Industrial Complex in January, 1961. Let me guess why: He was born in Texas, raised in Kansas, West Point and the world in general, while his wife was a San Antonio girl. No doubt -- the movers and shakers in Big Defense/Aerospace and Big Oil were ringing her bell, and Ike saw the writing on the wall. Ike was the one who said defense spending should grow by a small, fixed percent of GNP, or we wouldn't be able to pay for roads, schools and other things. Ike was the last great Republican President.
So -- leave Ike out of the sample. Start at 1960. Count two things: the number of Presidential terms, and the total of term years -- according to where the political careers started.
Since 1960, we've had something like 55% and 60+% of terms and term years from political careers in two states. Those two states had 19% of the total population and (therefore) congressional districts in 1960, and they pretty much were 19% by middle of last decade.
That doesn't make sense, or otherwise -- all our talent comes from two states!! What do those states have in common? During that period and past the end of the Cold War, they had three things: Big Oil, Defense Aerospace, and the largest number of paved highway miles among a ranking of the other 50 states.
What about all our wars after Korea? There were rumors of oil and other mineral deposits in the South China Sea, and now Vietnam has its own oil assets. Cuba is expected to become filthy rich during the next century -- for the same reason. We overthrew the Mossadegh regime in Iran during the early 50's, because the Brits didn't want to pay royalties on the oil extraction, and so they spun the old socialist explanation. That's one reason they still hate us.
Then there was April Glespie, Ambassador to Iraq under Bush the Smarter: she misspoke, suggesting that Saddam might as well invade Kuwait because it had "traditionally been part of Iraq." [The smell of oil is getting stronger.] Then, there was the terrorist threat in Afghanistan (as well as the Trillion dollars in estimated mineral wealth there.) And then -- the third largest oil reserve in the world -- the spigot turned to a trickle because of sanctions against Saddam.
I used to know a GS-9 careerist at CIA, who told me about meetings with "oil people" who suggested she could have a six-digit salary if she switched jobs. So there's a revolving door. There is also the Center for International and Strategic Studies, The Council on National Policy, the American Petroleum Institute.
No -- it's not the "gov'mint" callin' the shots. It's the industries and their momentum that "run the gov'mint." That's the reason for the propaganda campaign against the President from Illinois. The 2-percenters made a gross Waterloo-class mistake, and they're worried the rest of us will see it.
The Cornpones -- they think it's all about Ruby Ridge, Waco-Wacko, and "our precious bodily fluids." Who's the ostrich with his head in the tar-sands? Who doesn't see how things have worked for far too long?
What . . a crock . . . of Shee . . . [].
There are statistics which are small samples. They are indicative of things people have ignored for years, but some small samples cannot be "conclusive" because of the size or number of observations.
Eisenhower warned of the Military Industrial Complex in January, 1961. Let me guess why: He was born in Texas, raised in Kansas, West Point and the world in general, while his wife was a San Antonio girl. No doubt -- the movers and shakers in Big Defense/Aerospace and Big Oil were ringing her bell, and Ike saw the writing on the wall. Ike was the one who said defense spending should grow by a small, fixed percent of GNP, or we wouldn't be able to pay for roads, schools and other things. Ike was the last great Republican President.
So -- leave Ike out of the sample. Start at 1960. Count two things: the number of Presidential terms, and the total of term years -- according to where the political careers started.
Since 1960, we've had something like 55% and 60+% of terms and term years from political careers in two states. Those two states had 19% of the total population and (therefore) congressional districts in 1960, and they pretty much were 19% by middle of last decade.
That doesn't make sense, or otherwise -- all our talent comes from two states!! What do those states have in common? During that period and past the end of the Cold War, they had three things: Big Oil, Defense Aerospace, and the largest number of paved highway miles among a ranking of the other 50 states.
What about all our wars after Korea? There were rumors of oil and other mineral deposits in the South China Sea, and now Vietnam has its own oil assets. Cuba is expected to become filthy rich during the next century -- for the same reason. We overthrew the Mossadegh regime in Iran during the early 50's, because the Brits didn't want to pay royalties on the oil extraction, and so they spun the old socialist explanation. That's one reason they still hate us.
Then there was April Glespie, Ambassador to Iraq under Bush the Smarter: she misspoke, suggesting that Saddam might as well invade Kuwait because it had "traditionally been part of Iraq." [The smell of oil is getting stronger.] Then, there was the terrorist threat in Afghanistan (as well as the Trillion dollars in estimated mineral wealth there.) And then -- the third largest oil reserve in the world -- the spigot turned to a trickle because of sanctions against Saddam.
I used to know a GS-9 careerist at CIA, who told me about meetings with "oil people" who suggested she could have a six-digit salary if she switched jobs. So there's a revolving door. There is also the Center for International and Strategic Studies, The Council on National Policy, the American Petroleum Institute.
No -- it's not the "gov'mint" callin' the shots. It's the industries and their momentum that "run the gov'mint." That's the reason for the propaganda campaign against the President from Illinois. The 2-percenters made a gross Waterloo-class mistake, and they're worried the rest of us will see it.
The Cornpones -- they think it's all about Ruby Ridge, Waco-Wacko, and "our precious bodily fluids." Who's the ostrich with his head in the tar-sands? Who doesn't see how things have worked for far too long?
What . . a crock . . . of Shee . . . [].
