• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Sad story

KLin

Lifer
Text


He was interviewed by ksee24 a day after his wife was murdered. He told them that his life was over and he wanted to die. 🙁
 
Originally posted by: HamburgerBoy
The murdering bastards should be executed.

I agree. No room for second chances. I was watching some special on the national geographic channel on the MS gang...some scarey stuff.
 
Yeah...I don't care if they shoot themselves....but when they shoot innocent people and children and stuff...that's all kinds of wrong
 
Originally posted by: IGBT
..gangs are urban terrorists. When will we wake up to that fact??

Interesting statement, although I don't completely agree. Gangs usually don't have a greater objective, like the downfall of a government or the release of political prisoners. In that sense, gangs are a step below terrorists because their violence is often meaningless
 
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Originally posted by: IGBT
..gangs are urban terrorists. When will we wake up to that fact??

Interesting statement, although I don't completely agree. Gangs usually don't have a greater objective, like the downfall of a government or the release of political prisoners. In that sense, gangs are a step below terrorists because their violence is often meaningless

All the more reason to rid our towns of them.
 
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Originally posted by: IGBT
..gangs are urban terrorists. When will we wake up to that fact??

Interesting statement, although I don't completely agree. Gangs usually don't have a greater objective, like the downfall of a government or the release of political prisoners. In that sense, gangs are a step below terrorists because their violence is often meaningless

..they attempt to controll territory and traffic drugs. And in some cases the revenues from drug sales fund larger terrorist activity. Or fund encroachment/takeover of rival gang territory. Dealing with gangs as a "law enforcement" problem has largely failed. They're not afraid of jail or prison and it's not seen as a deterent. Talk to anybody in law enforcement "gang task force". The problem has grown and is generational and taking on a "para-military" character. They are terrorists.

 
Originally posted by: IGBT
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Originally posted by: IGBT
..gangs are urban terrorists. When will we wake up to that fact??

Interesting statement, although I don't completely agree. Gangs usually don't have a greater objective, like the downfall of a government or the release of political prisoners. In that sense, gangs are a step below terrorists because their violence is often meaningless

..they attempt to controll territory and traffic drugs. And in some cases the revenues from drug sales fund larger terrorist activity. Or fund encroachment/takeover of rival gang territory. Dealing with gangs as a "law enforcement" problem has largely failed. They're not afraid of jail or prison and it's not seen as a deterent. Talk to anybody in law enforcement "gang task force". The problem has grown and is generational and taking on a "para-military" character. They are terrorists.

If they "control territory", then they do not accept the authority of the US government while still operating within US borders. It may be a bit hazy, but I would still consider them to be terrorists after a fashion.

If prison is not a deterrent, what would be?
 
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: IGBT
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Originally posted by: IGBT
..gangs are urban terrorists. When will we wake up to that fact??

Interesting statement, although I don't completely agree. Gangs usually don't have a greater objective, like the downfall of a government or the release of political prisoners. In that sense, gangs are a step below terrorists because their violence is often meaningless

..they attempt to controll territory and traffic drugs. And in some cases the revenues from drug sales fund larger terrorist activity. Or fund encroachment/takeover of rival gang territory. Dealing with gangs as a "law enforcement" problem has largely failed. They're not afraid of jail or prison and it's not seen as a deterent. Talk to anybody in law enforcement "gang task force". The problem has grown and is generational and taking on a "para-military" character. They are terrorists.

If they "control territory", then they do not accept the authority of the US government while still operating within US borders. It may be a bit hazy, but I would still consider them to be terrorists after a fashion.

If prison is not a deterrent, what would be?

being forced to wear opposing gang's colors?
being raped by large angry men?
just shooting them in the ****** head?

dunno
 
I always believe in second chances.

But people that commit crimes that are so gross such as murdering a preagnant woman should only get their second chance in the next life.

Kill those ******.
 
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: IGBT
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Originally posted by: IGBT
..gangs are urban terrorists. When will we wake up to that fact??

Interesting statement, although I don't completely agree. Gangs usually don't have a greater objective, like the downfall of a government or the release of political prisoners. In that sense, gangs are a step below terrorists because their violence is often meaningless

..they attempt to controll territory and traffic drugs. And in some cases the revenues from drug sales fund larger terrorist activity. Or fund encroachment/takeover of rival gang territory. Dealing with gangs as a "law enforcement" problem has largely failed. They're not afraid of jail or prison and it's not seen as a deterent. Talk to anybody in law enforcement "gang task force". The problem has grown and is generational and taking on a "para-military" character. They are terrorists.

If they "control territory", then they do not accept the authority of the US government while still operating within US borders. It may be a bit hazy, but I would still consider them to be terrorists after a fashion.

If prison is not a deterrent, what would be?

Killing them likely would be.
 
Well I am going to look at it this way, all three of them are together once again in a better place.
The gangsters who shot and killed this poor woman and her child will get there justice on their deathbeds.(burn in hell for eternity)
 
Back
Top