- Nov 30, 2012
- 22,757
- 617
- 121
Granted, I'm not a news junkie nor am I making an astute observation of the story, but I'm not the only one who misread the title of that newspaper, right?
![]()
The article makes a valiant effort to make this seem remarkable, but isn't stuff like this rather routine?
as old as the F15 is , it can still target multiple targets simultaneously and fire .
No you did not. It is a guy thing, to see bacon wherever possible.Granted, I'm not a news junkie nor am I making an astute observation of the story, but I'm not the only one who misread the title of that newspaper, right?
![]()
Granted, I'm not a news junkie nor am I making an astute observation of the story, but I'm not the only one who misread the title of that newspaper, right?
![]()
Why shouldn't the Russians be worried about a forward nuclear ops base that is being reinforced with long range bombers?
This is merely a response, saying "well, if you increase your East-Asia capability, remember that this is -our- region of interest".
Guam is four times closer to Russia, than to mainland US.
Relocating the Okinawa base there is one thing, but stationing B2s another.
Also, lol at the article claiming nuclear weapons in the first paragraph, and later adding "possibly nuclear or conventional weapons".
This.
Just love Bolton adding in his usual chicken hawk bullshit.
Every day brings new evidence that Obamas ideological obsession with dismantling our nuclear deterrent is dangerous, Bolton said. Our national security is in danger of slipping off the national agenda even as the threats grow.
Cold war is over; get over it man.
I too was disappointed there was no bacon.![]()