• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Russian bombers resume Cold War sorties

The US does it all the time, I just do not understand why it won't let others do it.
 
It's understandable to both do it, and for other countries to go meet them. It sounds like there was no harm or even risk of harm.
 
Originally posted by: dug777


I assume they were 'Bears'? They're funky planes, apparently about the noisiest things in the sky 😉


Yeah, there's no chance of those monsters sneaking up on anyone...🙂
 
Originally posted by: 3cho
The US does it all the time, I just do not understand why it won't let others do it.

We do let others do it. Russians are allowed to fly their bombers anywhere in international airspace, and we are allowed to fly our fighters next to their bombers in international airspace too. And vice versa.
 
I guess next thing will be the "fishing trawlers" tagging along behind our carriers again. I remember when I did a Med cruise on the Independence in 1977 we were met by one of those planes when we were about 1 day out from Rota, Spain. It was all very routine, we launched the ready fighters to go up and meet it and continued on as normal.
 
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Keeping up foreign relations. You know, giving him the bird

You're everyone's problem! That's because every time you go up in the air, you're unsafe. I don't like you because you're dangerous. :|

BTW, the Blue Angels are here in Portland this weekend. Sweet! 😀
 
On Wednesday a Russian bomber flew over a US military base on the Pacific island of Guam and "exchanged smiles" with US pilots scrambled to track it, said Major-General Pavel Androsov, head of long-range aviation in the Russian air force.

we shoulda shot it down. totally justified.
 
Originally posted by: maddogchen
On Wednesday a Russian bomber flew over a US military base on the Pacific island of Guam and "exchanged smiles" with US pilots scrambled to track it, said Major-General Pavel Androsov, head of long-range aviation in the Russian air force.

we shoulda shot it down. totally stupid over reaction.

Fixed it for you.
 
Originally posted by: maddogchen
On Wednesday a Russian bomber flew over a US military base on the Pacific island of Guam and "exchanged smiles" with US pilots scrambled to track it, said Major-General Pavel Androsov, head of long-range aviation in the Russian air force.

we shoulda shot it down. totally justified.

:roll:
 
Originally posted by: Linflas
I guess next thing will be the "fishing trawlers" tagging along behind our carriers again. I remember when I did a Med cruise on the Independence in 1977 we were met by one of those planes when we were about 1 day out from Rota, Spain. It was all very routine, we launched the ready fighters to go up and meet it and continued on as normal.

I was born that year. 😱
 
Originally posted by: maddogchen
On Wednesday a Russian bomber flew over a US military base on the Pacific island of Guam and "exchanged smiles" with US pilots scrambled to track it, said Major-General Pavel Androsov, head of long-range aviation in the Russian air force.

we shoulda shot it down. totally justified.

I like the way this man doesn't think.
 
Originally posted by: 3cho
The US does it all the time, I just do not understand why it won't let others do it.

the US does not fly nuclear loaded bombers on old cold war missions anymore. nor do we have bombers sitting on the tarmac loaded with nukes.
 
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: 3cho
The US does it all the time, I just do not understand why it won't let others do it.

the US does not fly nuclear loaded bombers on old cold war missions anymore. nor do we have bombers sitting on the tarmac loaded with nukes.

Maybe you are right? But that may be because for the US, nukes on plans are no longer considered as first strike weapons. I guess I should have phrased my OP more carefully.
 
Originally posted by: 3cho
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: 3cho
The US does it all the time, I just do not understand why it won't let others do it.

the US does not fly nuclear loaded bombers on old cold war missions anymore. nor do we have bombers sitting on the tarmac loaded with nukes.

Maybe you are right? But that may be because for the US, nukes on plans are no longer considered as first strike weapons. I guess I should have phrased my OP more carefully.

He's right, no B52s on alert anymore.

Though our Minuteman III and Trident submarine arsenal can deliver a tad more than a stern letter PDQ.
 
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: 3cho
The US does it all the time, I just do not understand why it won't let others do it.

the US does not fly nuclear loaded bombers on old cold war missions anymore. nor do we have bombers sitting on the tarmac loaded with nukes.
That's because we have ICBM's loaded with MIRV's sitting in deep-ass silos that can reach their targets far quicker than any bomber could.
 
Originally posted by: 3cho
The US does it all the time, I just do not understand why it won't let others do it.

What do you mean we don't let others do it? Did we shoot them down?
 
Back
Top