Runways not needed for take off.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
OP you are such an asshole! :twisted:

Mythbusters have already proven a plane can take off from a treadmill. Whether it would be cost effective though I find doubtfull. Maybe for aircraft carriers.

no. Aircraft carriers already have a good system in place.
 

twinrider1

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2003
4,096
64
91
force.gif



---
EDIT: I thought windmill in op's graphic was a fan in front of the treadmill. Realize now it was just a distant power source.
---

Fan will generate lift.
Fan will not generate thrust.
Treadmill does nothing.

I suppose, if the fan were tall enough and powerful enough, and as mentioned, eliminate the vortex, and you could keep the plane level, you could power up and fly out of the airstream.
 
Last edited:

Vdubchaos

Lifer
Nov 11, 2009
10,408
10
0
OP seems to not know that it isn't the wheels that drive the plane forward on the ground but the engines. it would still moved forward even it the treadmill could go 200 mph.

besides didn't mythbusters already take care of this?

Mythbusters experiment was kind of weak and not sure it can be used as proof.

BUT I still think plane will take off.

The only thing i see as being as issue is the wheel bearing taking double/triple the speed/stress of a regular take off.
 

Number1

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
7,881
549
126
Mythbusters have already proven a plane can take off from a treadmill. Whether it would be cost effective though I find doubtfull. Maybe for aircraft carriers.

WOA, you have NO understanding of the issue. LOL

Cost effective?

The plane takes off because it moves forward. All the treadmill does is spin the wheels faster....
 

Number1

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
7,881
549
126
Or, if the plane had really good brakes and tires. Slam on the brakes = instant takeoff! :hmm:

According to the OP's diagram, if the plane applies the brakes hard, the plane is going to be catapulted BACKWARD. Can a plane take off backward?
 

who?

Platinum Member
Sep 1, 2012
2,327
42
91
The book about the Air America airline says that the stall speed of their Pilatus Porter airplanes was 35 mph. If they were on a mountain top and the wind went faster than that they could take off from the wind generated lift.
 
Feb 25, 2011
16,994
1,622
126
Mythbusters have already proven a plane can take off from a treadmill. Whether it would be cost effective though I find doubtfull. Maybe for aircraft carriers.

You know how I know you weren't really paying attention to that episode?

I was kinda hoping OP would be about EM catapults or giant slingshots or something. Troll Physics is so fucking 2010/11.
 

GrumpyMan

Diamond Member
May 14, 2001
5,780
266
136
Don't the wings have to have air rushing over them in order to generate lift from underneath the wings? I don't see how moving the wheels going 200 m/hr would generate the air movement over the wings to generate enough lift for the airplane to actually fly.
 

M0oG0oGaiPan

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2000
7,858
2
0
digitalgamedeals.com
dyel? you've never worked out at one of those crappy planet fitness gyms have you? they usually have a sea of treadmills and some how those things break down constantly. takes forever to get up and running again.
 

Thebobo

Lifer
Jun 19, 2006
18,574
7,672
136
Don't the wings have to have air rushing over them in order to generate lift from underneath the wings? I don't see how moving the wheels going 200 m/hr would generate the air movement over the wings to generate enough lift for the airplane to actually fly.


DING DING DING YOU WIN!

Well its actaully the low air presure on top of the wing the generates lift

wing.gif
 
Last edited: