I know it was faster.... but there should be NO reason to run the FSB at a slower speed than what you can run the ram at. NONE.Originally posted by: Jeff7181
Originally posted by: Whitedog
I can see running the RAM @ 166 and the FSB @ 200 ('cause your RAM may not be fast enough to run @ 200), but I certainly don't see the point in running the FSB @ 166 with the RAM @ 200? I don't know why he even suggested doing that?There's no point to that.
As you can see, 3DMark score went down, but FPS increased by 1-2. So maybe it's not so bad afterall. I think it would make more of a difference if Athlon XP's were as bandwidth hungry as P4's, but they're not, so latency is more of an issue than maximum bandwidth.
Originally posted by: Whitedog
Jeff, I've a question. If I plopped a Barton 2500+ in my A7N8X board... I'd be limited to 12.5x multX?
Originally posted by: pspada
Very interesting. I'm going to get an 8RDA+ in the next day or so, and I'll try anologous tests, and let you know what happens. I'm also intending to run my Barton at the highest clockspeed I can at a 200fsb.
Meanwhile, I suspect you'd have gotten more than just a point or two additional FPS in your SOF saved game if you'd set the RAM back to the highest stable 5-2-2-2, instead of trying it still set to 7-3-3-2.5
Originally posted by: Whitedog
Jeff, I've a question. If I plopped a Barton 2500+ in my A7N8X board... I'd be limited to 12.5x multX?
Originally posted by: selfbuilt
Originally posted by: Whitedog
Jeff, I've a question. If I plopped a Barton 2500+ in my A7N8X board... I'd be limited to 12.5x multX?
My Barton 2500+ tops out at 12.5 (max available) on my A7N8X board.
Running at lowly 2.08GHz ;-) ... I haven't tried increasing the external freq yet, but I've heard you can comfortably go to at least 185Mhz or so with the 2500+ .... maybe 200 if you are lucky.
Originally posted by: pspada
I'd considered the Asus mobo, but the reason I want a 8DRA+ is that it should have multipliers above 12.5 available off the shelf, right?
I new feel much better having blown the extra bucks to go to PC3200 directly from PC2100, without stopping at PC2700 on the way.
Now, tho, I think I want one of these, which claims native support for the 400Mhz Barton:
FIC KT-748
Originally posted by: Whitedog
My Rev 1.06 does the same thing... XP3200+ @ 200x11, but I have to set my memory at such rediculously slow timings to get it to boot at 200MHz, it's not even funny. :disgust:
I'm sticking with 180x13![]()
Originally posted by: Jeff7181
More like at least 200, maybe 220 if you're lucky. The deciding factor is your RAM. If you're using PC2700 RAM, set your FSB at 221, set the ram at 75% and set your multiplier at 10. That's how I ran mine for a long time until I got PC3200 RAM.
Originally posted by: selfbuilt
Originally posted by: Jeff7181
More like at least 200, maybe 220 if you're lucky. The deciding factor is your RAM. If you're using PC2700 RAM, set your FSB at 221, set the ram at 75% and set your multiplier at 10. That's how I ran mine for a long time until I got PC3200 RAM.
Actually, I was thinking of the HardOCP article on the Barton 2500+. Not all of their test subjects were able to make it to 200FSB, even with board and memory permitting, but all could do 185 stably. But of course, like you say, if your Barton can make it to 220, then simply run your PC2700 memory at 75% async to the CPU and you'll still be within mem specs.
I[m running in sync now... just not at 200. I got my SLK-900U in yesterday and got it installed (Nice cooler, it lowered my temp by 10c!). My previous cooler was an all copper Kanie Hedgehog.Originally posted by: Jeff7181
Originally posted by: Whitedog
My Rev 1.06 does the same thing... XP3200+ @ 200x11, but I have to set my memory at such rediculously slow timings to get it to boot at 200MHz, it's not even funny. :disgust:
I'm sticking with 180x13![]()
If you don't have PC3200 RAM it will be hard to run it in sync...