[Rumor (Various)] AMD R7/9 3xx / Fiji / Fury

[.vodka]

That R9 Nano.

Wat.

Fiji is able to go by with such a small air cooler? 2x perf/watt now? I need to see reviews of this.

 

[IEC]

4 cards with Fiji
R9 Nano (6 inch long, single fan cooled, 2x perf/watt vs 290X)
Fury
Fury X
Fury X2

 

[parvadomus]

The nano is 2X perf/watt over 290X and not even using WC. WTF?

 

[monstercameron]

4 fiji cards

watercooled
nano
dual
what else?

 

[psolord]

r9 fury nano is cute! 😛

I think Lisa said 2X perf per watt over the 290X for the nano.

 

[biostud]

So nano might by Fury pro?

 

[Azix]

r9 fury nano is cute! 😛

I think Lisa said 2X perf per watt over the 290X for the nano.

it'll likely be underclocked more than pro, but still worth.

 

[cbrunny]

I think this might be when people start eating hats and shoes.

 

[Glo.]

Lisa said, the Nano has significantly more performance than R9 290X with half the power needed.

HOLY COW.

 

[biostud]

4 fiji cards

watercooled
nano
dual
what else?

Fury Air cooled.

 

[B-Riz]

8.9 billion transistors!

 

[sandorski]

Can't wait for reviews. 980ti sounds like it's toast.

 

[IEC]

R9 Fury X (1.5x Perf/W)
R9 Nano (2x Perf/Watt)

vs 290X

 

[blastingcap]

290x vs Fiji

2816 SPs -> 4096 (doesn't say anything about clocks)
5.6 -> 8.6 Tflops
6.3B transistors -> 8.9B

As previously mentioned by Lisa, Nano at 2x perf/watt vs 290X; 1.5x perf/watt for Fury X vs 290X

 

[zagitta]

 

[monstercameron]

raja jsut claimed 2x perf/Watt wth is going on?

 

[cbrunny]

cross your fingers that we'll see nda lift today at some point... it'd be nice for reviews to come out immediately.

 

[LTC8K6]

Per watt improvement is fine, but what is the actual performance?

 

[.vodka]

I'm in shock how AMD was able to avoid stuff like this getting leaked.

Reviews on the fury family should be amazing.

--------------

HBM everywhere in the future generations. Nice!

 

[monstercameron]

who the hell cares about rebrands now?

 

[DownTheSky]

Holy shit this is nothing like those slides!

R9 390 to troll us

Fiji to amaze us.


Good job AMD! 😀 (not sarcasm)

 

[Eymar]

who the hell cares about rebrands now?

What rebrands? 🙂

 

[MrTeal]

Well, if FuryX uses even the same power as the 290X (and 2x8pin would indicate that it might), 1.5X performance would give around TX performance. Hopefully we'll see some real benches today, but I'm not holding my breath.

 

[Glo.]

AMD Radeon Graphics ‏@AMDRadeon
AMD Radeon R9 Nano brings more performance than a Radeon R9 290X, and at 50% the size and 50% the power, it’s 2X as efficient.

Here is confirmation.

 

[Azix]

Just need to know nano price. 390x is $100 over 390. Not optimistic